Comments on: Larry Flynt, John Bolton, and Forced Sex

By: Colonel Pash

Colonel Pash — Tue, 17 May 2005 03:13:04 +0000

Just when I was beginning to doubt that Bolton might not be a suitable amabassador to the world, this news comes along. Bolton is the perfect symbol for a ruling party that wants to fuck as many people at the same time as it can.

By: Slublog

Slublog — Mon, 16 May 2005 02:50:02 +0000

With Friends Like These...
Rightwingsparkle mentions a story that I hadn't heard - that porn magnate Larry Flynt is trying to dig up dirt on John Bolton, President Bush's nominee for Ambassador to the United Nations. Outside the Beltway has more on the story....

By: Olinthus Petre

Olinthus Petre — Mon, 16 May 2005 02:37:41 +0000

Even though Bolton's a big wanker, he doesn't deserve to have this nonsense slung against him. He's got a daughter, who presumably loves him, and a new wife who hasn't done a runner yet.

Lying to help turn the good old USA into the sort of country that invades, conquers, and occupies far away lands under false pretenses to steal oil should be enough reason to vote against him. That and tens of thousands of dead Iraqi civilians, 1,600 dead US military and all the half-men in the veterans hospitals.

By: sue

sue — Sat, 14 May 2005 05:48:27 +0000

All very interesting. Two problems though-the court documents don't say anything about forced group sex. In fact Bolton's ex-wife wasn't even at the divorce hearing. Secondly not a single named person has said that this happened. It's all crouched in terms of "sources confirmed...", "sources said..." I or anyone else can make up anything about anyone else..say even a democrat senator...and use this method to smear someone. Also it's probable that we'll see all kinds of allegations like this by the liberals. They not only want to smear anyone that President Bush has nominated or appointed, but then they can also say, "And they say they're the party of family values?" The third reason is that they think they can 'peel off' some of the conservative Christians voters, or as they say-the fundamentalist extremists. Their logic says that 'fundamentalist extremists' are dumb and are 'sheeple'; they will vote for who ever they are "told" to vote for. If republicans are accused of sexual scandals then Christian conservatives will be disgusted and will not vote. They evidently think we're too dumb to know what they are doing when they smear a conservative politician when there is no definitive proof.

By: Roach

Roach — Sat, 14 May 2005 05:14:13 +0000

I loathe all you disgusting, vile, perverted republicans.. Now I am going back to my good old lesbian porn you sickos! BTW before I go, who was Jeff Gannon having sex witgh in the white house?

By: Greg Hamilton

Greg Hamilton — Sat, 14 May 2005 05:02:36 +0000

IOKIYAR - it's ok if you're a republican.

Excesses of youth. That's hilarious.

Ask yourself how you would react if a Democratic nominee had forced his wife to go to sex clubs.

Hypocrites.

By: bithead

bithead — Fri, 13 May 2005 19:36:45 +0000

When hte Democrats start calling on Larry Frynt to give pronouncem,ent on the morality of ANYTHING, much less a Bolton appointment, you know they're run outta dog poop to toss.

By: lloydyboy

lloydyboy — Fri, 13 May 2005 02:28:36 +0000

Flynt has a good record at outing pervs -- Livingston, Hyde, et al. God bless Larry.

By: McGehee

McGehee — Thu, 12 May 2005 20:15:01 +0000

What court documents support, if anything, is that somebody claims he did something. Now, if the case were going anywhere I'm betting a refutation would have been offered.

But if the case got thrown out of court by a judge who was laughing so hard at the whole thing that he wet his robes, well...

By: Jack Tanner

Jack Tanner — Thu, 12 May 2005 20:02:15 +0000

BID -

I thought it was the lefties who wanted the gov't out of yourbedroom? Oh except when it can be used for political gain?

By: BURN IT DOWN

BURN IT DOWN — Thu, 12 May 2005 17:54:16 +0000

Keep in mind, COURT DOCUMENTS SUPPORT this, and he cannot deny the truth.

By: kappiy

kappiy — Thu, 12 May 2005 16:22:09 +0000

This explains his creepy mustache!

By: craig henry

craig henry — Thu, 12 May 2005 15:23:44 +0000

Not sure i agree with this: "No one wants to be on the same side as Flynt on an issue."

IIRC, the Clintonites happily made common cause with Flynt during the impeachment process. And Hollywood gave him big, slobbery kisses as a 1st Amendment stalwart.

By: James Durbin

James Durbin — Thu, 12 May 2005 15:02:53 +0000

Hey, it worked to boot out Jack Ryan.
There is no doubt in my mind that we are in for a long decade of sex stories about Republicans who run for office.
The purpose is to drive out anyone interesting or experienced who has turned away from the excesses of their youth to find a better path.

What's next? Pointing out that a candidate had sex before marriage and therefore is a hypocrite unable to serve? Bringing up ex-girlfriends who complain about a nasty break-up?

I thought none of this stuff mattered to the enlightened.

By: McGehee

McGehee — Thu, 12 May 2005 14:20:49 +0000

In other news, corroborated allegations that Mr. Flynt has forced innocent pigeons to engage in group sex, have not been refuted by the Hustler magazine publisher.