Renditions? Continuing.

Indefinite detention at the sole discretion of the Executive? Continuing.

Enhanced Interrogation Techniques? Continuing.

The only changes have been the letter behind the President's name, the treatment of the situation by the press, and the descriptors for these issues. The only notable commentators to maintain their integrity on this issue so far have been Greenwald and Maddow, of all people. It's actually humorous.

First I've heard of it. Consider it blogged.

Obama Administration Asserts Uighur Detainees Have No Right to Come to US

I remember those halcyon days when Alex was up in arms about the innocent Uighurs, so long ago. Last week or thereabouts.

When, I ask, will the "not a utilitarian or relativist" apply his high moral dudgeon to Obama? Answer: never, because while not a relativist, he's a complete partisan hack and hypocrite.

Tlaloc-did you see the new Star Trek movie? Your buddie spock plays a big role.

So.... Carl was briefed and Nancy was not, got it!

Levin is talking about after the fact briefings, not consultation prior to the acts.

I imagine he got crossed off of a few Bris invite lists for that one.

At that point, the question becomes "What is the larger immorality? The fact that we roughed up a terrorist, or that we ignored the opoprtunity to save innocent lives?"

Tlaloc answers this:

The question here is if a concrete illegal means is justified by a completely hypothetical end

(emphasis mine)

That's really the conundrum. We CAN'T know beforehand that such actions will get

1) useful information
2) information gathered is necessary to save lives
3) information gathered that is necessary to save lives will actually save lives

So, pursuit of these techniques is based on faith alone that the person in question has information that is crucial to the welfare of others.

That makes the balancing act a wee bit lopsided in my view.

But Alex is right, let's have all the information before we attempt to pass judgment on anyone.

So, that's the new metric? Quantification of lives saved? If you don't save enough folks, you can't go EIT?

Of course, all extraction of "valuable intelligence" at Gitmo was via "abusive techniques." Hell, weren't we told that we waterboarded KSM at least 100 times a day, every day? No time left for pleasantries; do the math.

Stop the Freak Show. Release the memos. Now.

Sometimes. For example killing assailants who is in the process of killing people would be justified. Is it awful to kill someone? Yes but the end goal of protecting others justify the act of killing someone.

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano, in a written statement, said the two documents Cheney requested are the subject of two pending lawsuits seeking the release of documents related to the interrogation program, and cannot be declassified.

If memory serves that is the result of a Bush era executive order. If that is the case Obama could simply reverse that order and make them available.

Do you think that ends justify means? That's the general utilitarian principle. I don't think that that's a valid moral doctrine.