<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libby Prosecution:  Marc Grossman&#8217;s Testimony (Pt. 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_prosecution_marc_grossmans_testimony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_prosecution_marc_grossmans_testimony/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:23:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: World and Global Politics Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Libby Defense Team Losing Hearts and Minds?</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_prosecution_marc_grossmans_testimony/comment-page-1/#comment-111005</link>
		<dc:creator>World and Global Politics Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Libby Defense Team Losing Hearts and Minds?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/libby_prosecution_marc_grossmans_testimony/#comment-111005</guid>
		<description>[...] The Libby team, though, is being far too heavy-handed in my estimation. When cross-examining Marc Grossman (see here and here), for example, it seemed to me that he had, quite amiably, given them exactly the answers they wanted in the first five minutes. They continued to belabor the point for another two hours, spread over two days, and challenged his integrity. Ultimately, they scored a few points but they may have done so at the cost of alienating the jury. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Libby team, though, is being far too heavy-handed in my estimation. When cross-examining Marc Grossman (see here and here), for example, it seemed to me that he had, quite amiably, given them exactly the answers they wanted in the first five minutes. They continued to belabor the point for another two hours, spread over two days, and challenged his integrity. Ultimately, they scored a few points but they may have done so at the cost of alienating the jury. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_prosecution_marc_grossmans_testimony/comment-page-1/#comment-110540</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/libby_prosecution_marc_grossmans_testimony/#comment-110540</guid>
		<description>God, I am not sure which is more exciting--the Libby trial or  the Australian Open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I am not sure which is more exciting--the Libby trial or  the Australian Open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
