<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libby Trial:  Subtle Distinctions in Guilt or Innocence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:21:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vnjagvet</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/comment-page-1/#comment-110785</link>
		<dc:creator>vnjagvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/#comment-110785</guid>
		<description>You got that right, Paul;&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got that right, Paul;&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul lukasiak</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/comment-page-1/#comment-110730</link>
		<dc:creator>paul lukasiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/#comment-110730</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I suspect, though, that his firm inclination to convict would have gotten him stricken somewhere along the line. &lt;/I&gt;

....about six seconds into voir dire, if that long :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I suspect, though, that his firm inclination to convict would have gotten him stricken somewhere along the line. </i></p>
<p>....about six seconds into voir dire, if that long :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vnjagvet</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/comment-page-1/#comment-110723</link>
		<dc:creator>vnjagvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/#comment-110723</guid>
		<description>It is indeed fortunate for Libby that Paul Lukasiak did not make it onto the jury pool.

I suspect, though, that his firm inclination to convict would have gotten him stricken somewhere along the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed fortunate for Libby that Paul Lukasiak did not make it onto the jury pool.</p>
<p>I suspect, though, that his firm inclination to convict would have gotten him stricken somewhere along the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bain</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/comment-page-1/#comment-110720</link>
		<dc:creator>bain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/#comment-110720</guid>
		<description>I disagree. You seem to think Libby is charges with having a bad memory. He is not. He is charged with making up a story and telling that story to the FBI and the Grand Jury. When his story was shown to be false ... then he trotted out the &#039;I forgot&#039; defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. You seem to think Libby is charges with having a bad memory. He is not. He is charged with making up a story and telling that story to the FBI and the Grand Jury. When his story was shown to be false ... then he trotted out the 'I forgot' defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul lukasiak</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/comment-page-1/#comment-110719</link>
		<dc:creator>paul lukasiak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/#comment-110719</guid>
		<description>nice try, joyner, but you seem to be missing the point here.

1) Fitz is not that concerned with whether or not Grossman and Grenier mentioned &quot;the wife&quot;.  What he is doing is establishing that the Wilson trip was an &lt;strong&gt;extremely important &lt;/strong&gt;matter to Libby.  

2) Schmall testimony establishes a number of things---despite the expected defense efforts to portray Libby as so completely focussed on critical National Security issues, on a day when a whole pile of supposedly critical national security isses, on June 14 Libby was most concerned about his meeting with Tom Cruise, a press report that said that CIA personnel were feeling pressured by administration officials, and (most critically) Joe and Valerie Wilson &lt;b&gt;mentioned by name&lt;/b&gt; 

Cline&#039;s cross-examination that included the laundry list of topics also discussed that day -- intended (apparently) to demonstrate how people can forget really important stuff -- backfired on Libby, because Schmall was NOT &quot;tasked&quot; to find out more about any of those crucial issues.  Instead, Schmall&#039;s notes make it clear that Libby was concerned with &quot;trivial&quot; matters, and matters concerning the &lt;i&gt;public perception&lt;/i&gt; of the administration and its case for war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice try, joyner, but you seem to be missing the point here.</p>
<p>1) Fitz is not that concerned with whether or not Grossman and Grenier mentioned "the wife".  What he is doing is establishing that the Wilson trip was an <strong>extremely important </strong>matter to Libby.  </p>
<p>2) Schmall testimony establishes a number of things---despite the expected defense efforts to portray Libby as so completely focussed on critical National Security issues, on a day when a whole pile of supposedly critical national security isses, on June 14 Libby was most concerned about his meeting with Tom Cruise, a press report that said that CIA personnel were feeling pressured by administration officials, and (most critically) Joe and Valerie Wilson <b>mentioned by name</b> </p>
<p>Cline's cross-examination that included the laundry list of topics also discussed that day -- intended (apparently) to demonstrate how people can forget really important stuff -- backfired on Libby, because Schmall was NOT "tasked" to find out more about any of those crucial issues.  Instead, Schmall's notes make it clear that Libby was concerned with "trivial" matters, and matters concerning the <i>public perception</i> of the administration and its case for war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hindsight Factor &#124; We Hold These Truths to be Self-Evident</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/comment-page-1/#comment-132898</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hindsight Factor &#124; We Hold These Truths to be Self-Evident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/01/libby_trial_subtle_distinctions_difference_between_guilt_and_innocence/#comment-132898</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Libby trial: McClellan Talks Libby Leak on The Daily Show OTB-Libby Trial: Libby Trial: Cathie Martin’s Testimony Damaging OTB-Libby Trial: Libby Prosecution: Cathie Martin Testimony OTB-Libby Trial: Libby Prosecution: Craig Schmall Testimony (Pt. 2) OTB-Libby Trial: Libby Trial: Subtle Distinctions in Guilt or Innocence Dodgeblogium- Libby trial: Doughty Street with a bit of Scooter Crooks and Liars: Crooks and Liars- Libby trial: Libby is dreamy over Scientology BTC News- Libby Trial: Libby v Rove? Don’t get carried away&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Libby trial: McClellan Talks Libby Leak on The Daily Show OTB-Libby Trial: Libby Trial: Cathie Martin&rsquo;s Testimony Damaging OTB-Libby Trial: Libby Prosecution: Cathie Martin Testimony OTB-Libby Trial: Libby Prosecution: Craig Schmall Testimony (Pt. 2) OTB-Libby Trial: Libby Trial: Subtle Distinctions in Guilt or Innocence Dodgeblogium- Libby trial: Doughty Street with a bit of Scooter Crooks and Liars: Crooks and Liars- Libby trial: Libby is dreamy over Scientology BTC News- Libby Trial: Libby v Rove? Don&rsquo;t get carried away<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
