<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberaltarian Fissures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/liberaltarian_fissures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/liberaltarian_fissures/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:13:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/liberaltarian_fissures/comment-page-1/#comment-107351</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/12/tnr_to_libertarians_drop_dead/#comment-107351</guid>
		<description>Man it would be a lot easier to respond to Chait&#039;s argument if it weren&#039;t hidden behind a subscribers-only firewall.

That said, as a libertarian (small-l only), I can honestly say that I see no real prospect of any real alliance with modern liberals who reject pretty much everything we believe in. 

I don&#039;t like the direction the GOP has taken in the last 6 years or so (and I don&#039;t think I&#039;m alone in that opinion), but at least I know that I have a common philosophical grounding with Republicans. How a libertarian can forge an alliance with someone who rejects most of what (she believes in escapes me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man it would be a lot easier to respond to Chait's argument if it weren't hidden behind a subscribers-only firewall.</p>
<p>That said, as a libertarian (small-l only), I can honestly say that I see no real prospect of any real alliance with modern liberals who reject pretty much everything we believe in. </p>
<p>I don't like the direction the GOP has taken in the last 6 years or so (and I don't think I'm alone in that opinion), but at least I know that I have a common philosophical grounding with Republicans. How a libertarian can forge an alliance with someone who rejects most of what (she believes in escapes me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from the Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/liberaltarian_fissures/comment-page-1/#comment-124221</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from the Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/12/tnr_to_libertarians_drop_dead/#comment-124221</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;The Corner there are reactions from Jonah Goldberg (who also has a longer column on the topic), John Hood, and Ramesh Ponnuru. Jonathan Adler comments at Volokh Conspiracy. James Joyner&#039;s contribution is at Outside the Beltway. And Ezra Klein gets in a few more shots from his sniper&#039;s perch at TAPped.    There&#039;s so much consensus, maybe they should form a liberal-conservative alliance founded on mutual disdain for libertarians. The short version: Libertarians are are too&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->The Corner there are reactions from Jonah Goldberg (who also has a longer column on the topic), John Hood, and Ramesh Ponnuru. Jonathan Adler comments at Volokh Conspiracy. James Joyner's contribution is at Outside the Beltway. And Ezra Klein gets in a few more shots from his sniper's perch at TAPped.    There's so much consensus, maybe they should form a liberal-conservative alliance founded on mutual disdain for libertarians. The short version: Libertarians are are too<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
