<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman vs. Lamont: Liveblogging The Debate (Video Added)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:06:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Global Geopolitics News &#187; Balkan News - Newest firefighters bring experience</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-89201</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Geopolitics News &#187; Balkan News - Newest firefighters bring experience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 18:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-89201</guid>
		<description>[...] Lieberman vs. Lamont: Liveblogging The Debate (Video Added)Outside Beltway - I had this same position when Bill Clinton was in Bosnia. You can not set a deadline and must wait until the job is done. 7:11 : Lamont : Lieberman keeps saying we re going to turn the corner. Well, that corner is a square. 7:12 : Lieberman [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lieberman vs. Lamont: Liveblogging The Debate (Video Added)Outside Beltway - I had this same position when Bill Clinton was in Bosnia. You can not set a deadline and must wait until the job is done. 7:11 : Lamont : Lieberman keeps saying we re going to turn the corner. Well, that corner is a square. 7:12 : Lieberman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-89055</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-89055</guid>
		<description>Slim, really no need to be such an ass.  Maybe it just comes natural, though.

If Joe wants to be a regular with Sean Hannity and have guys like you like him, that&#039;s fine.  Seems to have gotten him in a little trouble with the voters, though, doesn&#039;t it?

I still think he&#039;ll win the primary, but narrowly.  He should get the message that it&#039;s fine to take a &quot;principled stand&quot;, but don&#039;t trash the guys on your own side.  Joe Lieberman has done a lot of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slim, really no need to be such an ass.  Maybe it just comes natural, though.</p>
<p>If Joe wants to be a regular with Sean Hannity and have guys like you like him, that's fine.  Seems to have gotten him in a little trouble with the voters, though, doesn't it?</p>
<p>I still think he'll win the primary, but narrowly.  He should get the message that it's fine to take a "principled stand", but don't trash the guys on your own side.  Joe Lieberman has done a lot of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-89041</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-89041</guid>
		<description>I watched from Virginia (inside the Beltway):  Thought Lieberman came off as competent, but catty and rude . . . Lamont, as light-weight, but earnest and &quot;nice.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched from Virginia (inside the Beltway):  Thought Lieberman came off as competent, but catty and rude . . . Lamont, as light-weight, but earnest and "nice."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slim</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-89040</link>
		<dc:creator>Slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-89040</guid>
		<description>Pug is a classic example of libmoron disease. Moron boy, he was YOUR candidate in 2000, not the republicans&#039;. 

&quot;Heâ??s real nice to Republicans, though. Thatâ??s why they love him so much.&quot; Right clueless, that&#039;s why he was the DNC&#039;s pick to run AGAINST the republicans. 

Can&#039;t wait until they blame Joe for stealing the primary. Never look inside, always blame external sources when the results don&#039;t = unscientific polls and lib fantasy. Can&#039;t wait for reality to slap the clueless among us in the face, AGAIN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pug is a classic example of libmoron disease. Moron boy, he was YOUR candidate in 2000, not the republicans'. </p>
<p>"Heâ??s real nice to Republicans, though. Thatâ??s why they love him so much." Right clueless, that's why he was the DNC's pick to run AGAINST the republicans. </p>
<p>Can't wait until they blame Joe for stealing the primary. Never look inside, always blame external sources when the results don't = unscientific polls and lib fantasy. Can't wait for reality to slap the clueless among us in the face, AGAIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pug</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-89027</link>
		<dc:creator>Pug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-89027</guid>
		<description>The difference between Joe Lieberman last night and the Joe Lieberman who played footsies with Dick Cheney in the 2000 &quot;debate&quot; was striking.  Not saying he should have been rude to Cheney, but he laid down, took a beating and didn&#039;t even challenge Cheney on basic facts.

Joe only seems to play tough against Democrats like Ned Lamont or Bill Clinton.  He&#039;s real nice to Republicans, though.  That&#039;s why they love him so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between Joe Lieberman last night and the Joe Lieberman who played footsies with Dick Cheney in the 2000 "debate" was striking.  Not saying he should have been rude to Cheney, but he laid down, took a beating and didn't even challenge Cheney on basic facts.</p>
<p>Joe only seems to play tough against Democrats like Ned Lamont or Bill Clinton.  He's real nice to Republicans, though.  That's why they love him so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yehudit</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-89014</link>
		<dc:creator>Yehudit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-89014</guid>
		<description>I was just perusing the pro-lamont blogs and they are all convinced Lamont won, and Leiberman looked arrogant and rude. Apparently Lamont is polling much better than Lieberman right after the debate.

Just FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just perusing the pro-lamont blogs and they are all convinced Lamont won, and Leiberman looked arrogant and rude. Apparently Lamont is polling much better than Lieberman right after the debate.</p>
<p>Just FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-89009</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 05:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-89009</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lieberman Vs. Lamont: Debate Time!...&lt;/strong&gt;

Kos and his friends have GOT to be mashing their heads against a wall after this fiasco.

Outside the Beltway liveblogged it, and Hot Air has a rather lengthy video clip.  

From what I saw, Lieberman took it to Lamont pretty hard.  Especially when...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lieberman Vs. Lamont: Debate Time!...</strong></p>
<p>Kos and his friends have GOT to be mashing their heads against a wall after this fiasco.</p>
<p>Outside the Beltway liveblogged it, and Hot Air has a rather lengthy video clip.  </p>
<p>From what I saw, Lieberman took it to Lamont pretty hard.  Especially when...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-89003</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-89003</guid>
		<description>One wonders if this Lieberman showed up against Cheney would who won Florida have even mattered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One wonders if this Lieberman showed up against Cheney would who won Florida have even mattered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Lieberman vs. Lamont</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-88993</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Video: Lieberman vs. Lamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-88993</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Greg Tinti liveblogged the hell out of it. He calls it an easy win for Joementum. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Greg Tinti liveblogged the hell out of it. He calls it an easy win for Joementum. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Liveblogging Lieberman - Lamont Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-88991</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Liveblogging Lieberman - Lamont Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 01:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-88991</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Greg Tinti, blogging at Outside The Beltway, also live blogged and calls it decisively for Lieberman. Without much reflection, it&#8217;s easy to call this debate for Lieberman. Despite his sometimes overzealous aggressiveness, I think anyone listening carefully would agree that Lieberman defeated Lamont handily with those silly little things called facts with which Lamont was curiously light. As far as I could tell, Lamont promised to be the progressive Santa to liberals but didn&#8217;t bother mentioning how he planned to accomplish any of his goals. And this played particularly well into Lieberman&#8217;s strategy of painting Lamont as a one-issue candidate which, of course, is arguably true. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Greg Tinti, blogging at Outside The Beltway, also live blogged and calls it decisively for Lieberman. Without much reflection, it&rsquo;s easy to call this debate for Lieberman. Despite his sometimes overzealous aggressiveness, I think anyone listening carefully would agree that Lieberman defeated Lamont handily with those silly little things called facts with which Lamont was curiously light. As far as I could tell, Lamont promised to be the progressive Santa to liberals but didn&rsquo;t bother mentioning how he planned to accomplish any of his goals. And this played particularly well into Lieberman&rsquo;s strategy of painting Lamont as a one-issue candidate which, of course, is arguably true. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark the Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-88989</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark the Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-88989</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Where was Lamont Then?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I watched the debate between Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman, and something struck me. Ned Lamont is only in this race because he is against the war in Iraq, and of course Joe Lieberman supports the war. Now, the war......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Where was Lamont Then?...</strong></p>
<p>I watched the debate between Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman, and something struck me. Ned Lamont is only in this race because he is against the war in Iraq, and of course Joe Lieberman supports the war. Now, the war......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donkey Cons</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-88986</link>
		<dc:creator>Donkey Cons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-88986</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Joe-Mentum: Live!...&lt;/strong&gt;

AllahPundit&#039;s liveblogging the Lieberman-Lamont debate. Like any loyal Republican, Mark Kilmer wants Looney Loser Lamont to win ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joe-Mentum: Live!...</strong></p>
<p>AllahPundit's liveblogging the Lieberman-Lamont debate. Like any loyal Republican, Mark Kilmer wants Looney Loser Lamont to win ......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spam filterning 101</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-129931</link>
		<dc:creator>Spam filterning 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-129931</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Links: Email Software Home -cheap bulk email software Looking for the latest assistance concerning cheap bulk email software. When you are after high-class information on cheap bulk email software, you’ll -   Lieberman vs. Lamont: Liveblogging The Debate (Video Added) Outside Beltway - NOTE: My spam filter automatically deletes any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post. Those doing it manually should ensure they have linked the post before sending the TrackBack ping.&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Links: Email Software Home -cheap bulk email software Looking for the latest assistance concerning cheap bulk email software. When you are after high-class information on cheap bulk email software, you&rsquo;ll -   Lieberman vs. Lamont: Liveblogging The Debate (Video Added) Outside Beltway - NOTE: My spam filter automatically deletes any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post. Those doing it manually should ensure they have linked the post before sending the TrackBack ping.<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hotline's Blogometer</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/comment-page-1/#comment-129932</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hotline's Blogometer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/07/lieberman_vs_lamont_liveblogging_the_debate/#comment-129932</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;as a Lieberman supporter (one of his many conservative supporters). But in my first prolonged exposure to Lamont I found him deeply unimpressive.&quot; Righty Blue Crab Boulevard: &quot;At the end of it all, my reading is that Lieberman beat heck out of Lamont.&quot; Outside The Beltway, which live-blogged the debate: &quot;Without much reflection, it&#039;s easy to call this debate for Lieberman. Despite his sometimes overzealous aggressiveness, I think anyone listening carefully would agree that Lieberman defeated Lamont handily with those&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->as a Lieberman supporter (one of his many conservative supporters). But in my first prolonged exposure to Lamont I found him deeply unimpressive." Righty Blue Crab Boulevard: "At the end of it all, my reading is that Lieberman beat heck out of Lamont." Outside The Beltway, which live-blogged the debate: "Without much reflection, it's easy to call this debate for Lieberman. Despite his sometimes overzealous aggressiveness, I think anyone listening carefully would agree that Lieberman defeated Lamont handily with those<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
