ABC and CBS in No Hurry to Name Permanent Anchors
 |
James Joyner | Tuesday, August 16, 2005 |
Even though Dan Rather retired months ago and Peter Jennings is now dead, their networks are in no rush to name their replacements.
Little urgency at ABC, CBS, to name successors (USA Today)
ABC announced Monday that it has dropped Peter Jennings’ name from World News Tonight, one week after the veteran anchor died of lung cancer at 67. “Of all people,” ABC News president David Westin said in a staff memo, “Peter insisted on accuracy. As much as we would have it otherwise, from now on World News Tonight with Peter Jennings will be known as World News Tonight.”
That announcement underlines key questions facing ABC and CBS: With Jennings’ death and Dan Rather’s premature departure in March, who will lead their broadcasts, and in what format? Neither network appears to be in any rush to make a decision.
ABC, still reeling from Jennings’ death, “is not close” to discussing a successor on World News, ABC News spokesman Jeff Schneider says. Good Morning America’s Charles Gibson and 20/20’s Elizabeth Vargas will continue to alternate as anchors. And CBS News president Andrew Heyward says CEO Leslie Moonves has set no “firm timetable” on unveiling a new CBS Evening News, which is now anchored by Bob Schieffer.
[...]
[N]either CBS’ nor ABC’s ratings have suffered much since Rather stepped down and during Jennings’ illness. That not only takes the pressure off the networks but it also is a sign that viewers are drawn to newscasts for stories, not star anchors, network news analyst Andrew Tyndall says. “You have to stop thinking in terms of big anchors and salaries and start thinking about formats and where the most interesting stories on these broadcasts can be repurposed,” he says. “The days when news divisions threw gobs of money at celebrity journalists and an all-star lineup under one banner are over.”
Bingo.
Fox News figured that out years ago. Certainly, Brit Hume was a well-established reporter, having been ABC’s White House correspondent, but he is not the focus of the Fox Special Report broadcast. Similarly, there’s no reason for CBS to be in a hurry to replace Bob Schieffer, who is affable, competent, and trustworthy.
About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.
Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
- None Found
- Swine flu is more popular than Dodd
- Paradox of Choice Paradoxically Untrue
- Private Forecasters Support Claim That Stimulus Worked
- Entertaining Kids During the Holidays
- How Much Will Escalation Cost?
- No Party of No
- Thought of the Day
- Queer International Studies
- OTB Latenight – r.e.m.
- Krugman on the Debt and Deficits
I feel a little sorry for Charles Gibson when he does the news, 'cause he's gotta be in the studio at 5am or earlier for GMA, and then he's gotta come back that night (or sleep in his office on the sofa) for WNT. Plus, Gibson is kind of wooden, kind of a Jennings-clone without any of Jennings's warmth or personality. If it has to be one of those two, I'd suggest Vargas.
One of my friends says we should just hire actors to do the news.
Personally, I think Seth McFarlane would do a GREAT job as a news anchor -- he has the look and the voice.
As for CBS... (shrug) I don't think anyone cares. I don't think anyone's watching.
Comments are Closed
