working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Living for Big Brother

Pubs in Yorkshire are being ordered to require patrons to remove their hats. Why? Because the hats are making it hard to identify people on CCTV.

Pubs in Yorkshire have been ordered to ban people from wearing flat caps or other hats so troublemakers can be more easily recognised.
The Park Hotel in Wadsley, Sheffield, is the latest to be asked to impose the rule by senior police officers.

Mark Kelly, the landlord said: “Police asked us to ensure that everyone removes headgear.

[...]

The measure, designed to prevent people from obscuring their faces from CCTV cameras, has been questioned by Barnsley’s former Test umpire Dickie Bird, 75, well-known for his favoured white flat cap.

He said: “Asking a Yorkshireman to take off his flat cap — whoever heard of anything so silly.

Sure, this might seem like a minor deal, but once you’ve established the precedent of losing just a little bit of freedom to make it easier to ID you on government cameras, it becomes that much easier to take the next step, doesn’t it?

(link via Radley Balko)

About the Author: Alex has a B.S. in Biochemistry from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and a J.D. from the University of Kansas School of Law. He has been published in the Kansas City Star, TCS Daily, and Comic Book Resources. He joined the staff of OTB in June 2006. Additionally, he’s been writing at Heretical Ideas since October, 2001, and also reviews cigars at Cigar Jack's Cigar News and Reviews.
 
 
Related Stories:
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

Their mothers should have taught this a while ago. My Mom gets on my case all the time if I forget to take my hat off. In a way, its proper hat etiquette coming back. Not into the government mandating this, though.

Posted by B. Minich | June 9, 2008 | 04:29 pm | Permalink
 

Cities and towns all over America that are far from being prime terrorist threats are putting in camera systems with homeland security grants. Smile, big brother is watching...

Posted by anjin-san | June 9, 2008 | 05:20 pm | Permalink
 

asked to impose the rule by senior police officers

Rule by fiat from the Police Department in the UK? Not a law, but a bureaucratic administrative rule? I also wonder if the CCTVs in the pubs are now required (and monitored) by the Police. But they are not going to issue a rule of no burquas, nor Sikhs' turbans.

Posted by Richard Gardner | June 9, 2008 | 05:22 pm | Permalink
 

Banks already do this in the US. At least they did in SC.

Posted by Jeff Quinton | June 9, 2008 | 06:32 pm | Permalink
 

Hey, so umbrellas and hats and hoodies obscure images on the outdoor cameras, too. So just soak in the rain for old Britannia, hey?

Plus, more head colds+pneumonia+influenza deaths = less national health expenditure over the lifetime of the citizen.

Win/win!

Posted by Brian J. | June 9, 2008 | 07:14 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

 
Post a Comment

(required)

(required)


Please use the "LINK" button atop the comment box or otherwise insert HTML tags around links to other pages rather than just pasting in a URL. Doing the latter reformats the page if the URL is long, since it will not break.

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.