Very surreal. I'm glad you mentioned it to rule out the possibility of fakery. Did you know Obama doesn't actually look like the Joker or Hitler?

How touching he gets the comfort of his family as he dies. Of course those killed in the bombing had no such comfort and many likely died terrified.

This is stupid and deserves to be called stupid.

It seems to me that this entire matter tends to undermine the case against capital punishment. When a sentence of 27 years becomes 7 and compassionate release, doesn't it become harder to argue for lengthy incarceration in the next case?

Right on, Steve.

He'll probably spend the last days of his life planning to kill others [but he just won't be able to carry that out...since he will be DEAD]

Hell is waiting for you, sir. Come right on down!

Thanks a Obama. This is exactly what happened when Hitler started. The first thing he did was release his friends from prison. The second thing he did was try and reform health care. The third thing Hitler did was impose a cap and tax scheme on Germany.

This is not a good sign.

I actually agree with Steve P - there may be cases for a sympathy release, but this surely ain't it. And the vilest part is that - from what I've read - sympathy actually has nothing to do with the UK's decision here. They're doing it as part of an oil rights deal with Libya. If true, this is disgusting, and the Brits will reap what they sow...

In the United States we do early release for people facing severely fading health. I don't believe it's sympathy though, it's avoidance of medical care costs. (and murderers aren't eligible)

Too bad they couldn't put him in a small plane with remote control and then just as he is going to land in Libya blow it up as his family watches. Would be justice well served, but civilized people don't do that, just think it. mpw

My own rather utilitarian response is that Scotland is saving some money not having to pay for his care as he approaches his demise.

(I see PD Shaw made a similar comment).

AFAIK the decision wasn't with the UK but with Scotland. He was jailed by a Scottish court under Scottish law (I remember that we had to declare a piece of the Netherlands temporarily Scottish for the trial, not British) and is being released under Scottish law by a Scottish minister in a Scottish government.

The quality of mercy is not strain'd,
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath: it is twice bless’d;
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.
’Tis mightiest in the mightiest; it becomes
The throned monarch better than his crown;
His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,
The attribute to awe and majesty,
Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings;
But mercy is above this sceptred sway,
It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself;
And earthly power doth then show likest God’s,
When mercy seasons justice.

AFAIK the decision wasn't with the UK but with Scotland.

Scotland is part of the UK, albeit with some limited autonomy over local matters.

Scotland is part of the UK, albeit with some limited autonomy over local matters

Local matters such as their laws, which happened to be the area you were commenting on. Wikipedia says it better than I do:

Scotland has partial self-government within the United Kingdom as well as representation in the UK Parliament. Executive and legislative powers have been devolved to, respectively, the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood in Edinburgh. The United Kingdom Parliament retains power over a set list of areas explicitly specified in the Scotland Act 1998 as reserved matters, including, for example, levels of UK taxes, social security, defence, international relations and broadcasting.

The Scottish Parliament has legislative authority for all other areas relating to Scotland, as well as limited power to vary income tax, a power it has yet to exercise. The Prime Minister, in a BBC Scotland interview, has indicated that the Scottish Parliament could be given more tax-raising powers.

I like Tammy Bruce's take on the situation:

This murderer of 270 people, mostly Americans, has been released on ‘compassionate’ grounds because he has cancer. In a world with no moral leadership, and certainly none from American so-called leadership, the death of right and wrong marches on.

Maybe Obama could go to Libya, meet with Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi, apologize for the United States, give him two billion dollars to drill for oil, and al-Gaddafi could give him a book. Then we would be on the road to "Hope and Change." in international affairs.

The icing on the cake would be for this guy to live a long and healthy life with the cancer in remission due to the change in climate.

re: Eneils Bailey August 20, 2009 17:35

That really was pathetic, especially since the president opposes letting this person go free...but I guess I understand how some people are so desperate to slam this president that they will use any piece of news, even something that has nothing to do with him or something he actually opposes, to try to smear him with...do carry on...

James, this was definitely the decision of the Scottish Executive. Nothing to do with the national UK government which is run by an altogether different political party(and the two are mutually hostile).

That said, I agree with the decision. Perhaps its a difference in opinion about what prison is menat to be about - rehabilitation or punishment. Since there's no chance of either now that the guy is on his last legs however, to keep him jailed is simply vindictiveness with no good reason. Steve Plunk misses something with his "eye for an eye" biblical zeal: no-one ever claimed the moral high ground with "but they're just as bad".

Regards, Steve

PS Is no-one going to call triumph on his ridiculous assertion that ObamaHitler somehow ordered the Scottish government to release a "friend" of his?

Almost as repulsive as only getting a 27 year sentence(one year for ten people) for murdering 270 people is getting released after 8 years.
And then the trip to Tripoli, on his arrival, he was hailed as a national hero. Could he become more of an inspiration to a new batch of terrorists by living out his last few years in Libya? Would his dying in a jail in Scotland inspire the terrorist? They certainly seem to have this belief that dying for their cause sends them to a better place with lots of young virgins.
I think something not to be ignored here is that Scotland may have just got cold feet and looked at repercussions to his dying in a jail in Scotland. Hate to think they caved due to the lack of a spine.

Apart from the fact wether one agrees with the decision or not (which indeed has to do with different opinions about what prison is about) it is totally a matter of the Scots. The UK doesn't really have anything to do with it and the Scots seem to mostly agree with their minister.

Frankly, the American 'outrage' seems less sincere in view of how William Calley was treated, or in view of the effort taken to punish the guys who shot flight 655 from Iran by giving them a medal. Justice for relatives of the victims seems less important when they are not American.

What a sad ******* joke this world has become.

desperate to slam this president

lol.....

Maybe Obama could go to Libya, meet with Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi, apologize for the United States, give him two billion dollars to drill for oil, and al-Gaddafi could give him a book. Then we would be on the road to "Hope and Change." in international affairs.

Or maybe you could say something intelligent. Doubtful, but anything is possible.

is it rather surreal that he’s flying home on a commercial airliner

Actually, I believe that is a private plane belonging to Gaddafi.

Suppose he's innocent and the PFLP-GC, working at Iranian orders, were really responsible...

Regards, Steve