<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Log Cabin Republicans Withhold Endorsement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:12:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wes010</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/comment-page-1/#comment-23531</link>
		<dc:creator>wes010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 21:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7410#comment-23531</guid>
		<description>Can you expect any more from the homosexuals?

To secure a new true love on the left, they would soon become socialists.

Do the homosexuals ever really vote Republican?

I suspect they vote for anyone they suspect will tear down the nation&#039;s morality to their own level. They pretend to be Republican just to attempt to corrupt the Republican party. When does the left leaning national press ever miss the opportunity to give these &quot;Democrats in Drag&quot; the air time to express their extremely 
micro-minority opinions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you expect any more from the homosexuals?</p>
<p>To secure a new true love on the left, they would soon become socialists.</p>
<p>Do the homosexuals ever really vote Republican?</p>
<p>I suspect they vote for anyone they suspect will tear down the nation's morality to their own level. They pretend to be Republican just to attempt to corrupt the Republican party. When does the left leaning national press ever miss the opportunity to give these "Democrats in Drag" the air time to express their extremely<br />
micro-minority opinions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/comment-page-1/#comment-23498</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 20:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7410#comment-23498</guid>
		<description>It sneaked into my brain and it&#039;s stuck there: drama queens.

I&#039;m sorry. I really am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sneaked into my brain and it's stuck there: drama queens.</p>
<p>I'm sorry. I really am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right On Red</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/comment-page-1/#comment-23479</link>
		<dc:creator>Right On Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7410#comment-23479</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Log Cabins Have Left the Building&lt;/strong&gt;
Sullie leads, they follow: The Log Cabin Republicans have bolted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Log Cabins Have Left the Building</strong><br />
Sullie leads, they follow: The Log Cabin Republicans have bolted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norbizness</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/comment-page-1/#comment-23478</link>
		<dc:creator>norbizness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7410#comment-23478</guid>
		<description>I think the current GOP platform goes a little further than calling for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. I think they&#039;re also down with working to deny civil unions or benefits for any same-sex couples:

http://www.logcabin.org/logcabin/press_082604.html

So, I&#039;d say they&#039;re fighting against a political movement that would be working towards the revocation of existing legal recognitions apart from marriage, as well as benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the current GOP platform goes a little further than calling for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. I think they're also down with working to deny civil unions or benefits for any same-sex couples:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.logcabin.org/logcabin/press_082604.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.logcabin.org/logcabin/press_082604.html</a></p>
<p>So, I'd say they're fighting against a political movement that would be working towards the revocation of existing legal recognitions apart from marriage, as well as benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/comment-page-1/#comment-23476</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7410#comment-23476</guid>
		<description>If this lack of an endorsement helps them achieve their goals, then good on &#039;em. My problem is, I can&#039;t figure out what they&#039;re actually trying to achieve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this lack of an endorsement helps them achieve their goals, then good on 'em. My problem is, I can't figure out what they're actually trying to achieve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/comment-page-1/#comment-23475</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7410#comment-23475</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll forgive me if I fail to mourn over the loss of the demonstrably flakey Andrew Sullivan wing on the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You'll forgive me if I fail to mourn over the loss of the demonstrably flakey Andrew Sullivan wing on the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/log_cabin_republicans_vote_to_withhold_endorsement_from_president_bush/comment-page-1/#comment-23474</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=7410#comment-23474</guid>
		<description>You nailed it.  The only reason it is an issue is because of the courts.  If the Mass. courts did not act, then we would not have even seen this question being discussed anywhere.

But, if the Log Cabin Republicans endorse any candidates who oppose same sex marriage (vast majority of politicians as far as I can tell), are they subject to charges of hypocrisy now that they have set this precedent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nailed it.  The only reason it is an issue is because of the courts.  If the Mass. courts did not act, then we would not have even seen this question being discussed anywhere.</p>
<p>But, if the Log Cabin Republicans endorse any candidates who oppose same sex marriage (vast majority of politicians as far as I can tell), are they subject to charges of hypocrisy now that they have set this precedent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
