<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lower Economic Growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lower_economic_growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lower_economic_growth/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:04:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tom p</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lower_economic_growth/comment-page-1/#comment-996247</link>
		<dc:creator>tom p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33785#comment-996247</guid>
		<description>File this one under &quot;Dog Bites Man&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>File this one under "Dog Bites Man".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odograph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/lower_economic_growth/comment-page-1/#comment-996232</link>
		<dc:creator>odograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=33785#comment-996232</guid>
		<description>Well, economic forecasts are BS.  That&#039;s the starting point.  After that, the administration gets to pick a number to put out there.

Normally they&#039;ll pick an optimistic one, but not totally ridiculous.  That&#039;s just the way it works.

But I can tell you one thing ... when talking 2015 to 2019 no one knows.  You CAN make a safe bet that trends will regress to mean, but being safe doesn&#039;t mean you know the confidence, whether the downturn will drag, or if some tech revolution will drive a new economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, economic forecasts are BS.  That's the starting point.  After that, the administration gets to pick a number to put out there.</p>
<p>Normally they'll pick an optimistic one, but not totally ridiculous.  That's just the way it works.</p>
<p>But I can tell you one thing ... when talking 2015 to 2019 no one knows.  You CAN make a safe bet that trends will regress to mean, but being safe doesn't mean you know the confidence, whether the downturn will drag, or if some tech revolution will drive a new economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
