Bush finds a new general. I thought that CENTCOM had charge of Iraq and Afghanistan. Confusing, if this adds a layer of command.

See previous: 2007.05.15 Dem Perfidy // Islamism Delenda Est Roundup Below the fold, newest items at the top: LTG Doug Lute Appointed War Czar Getting the War Wrong... Again Four Dems running for president vote to cut off Iraq funding...

Petraeus sounded good, too, *before* he was put on the pedestal.

That's what I'm saying, I think they are both smart officers who are now put in an impossible position because their bosses are utterly incompetent.

Unfortunately, just like Petraeus, he's now in the position of taking orders directly from people for whom "superior firepower" is the only way to fight.

So I guess it's got the markings of a Tragedy- the guys smart enough to make an effort to recoup the losses we've suffered are finally in place, and still can do nothing because they are constrained by the idiots who botched it int he first place.

In choosing Lute, Bush picked a key internal voice of dissent during the administration review that led to the troop increase. Reflecting the views of other members of the Joint Chiefs, Lute argued that a short-term "surge" would do little good and that any sustained increase in forces had to be matched by equal emphasis on political and economic steps, according to officials informed about the deliberations.

Um, isn't that what a lot of generals told Bush the _last_ time he said he was going to "listen to the commanders", back around last September? You know, just before Bush completely ignored them & stuck with "stay the course"? Isn't that largely what the ISG suggested? Before Bush ignored them too? Why does a single 3-star saying something give anyone hope, when a fistful of 4-stars have already been steamrolled?

And here's another question - what are all those over-ruled 4-stars going to do if Bush really does this just because "Lute says"? Will we see more senior officers retiring in disgust a la Eaton and Batiste?

This is a sign that Bush wants to distance himself from a pullout.

While this would clearly be the tool to do that with (creating a scapegoat so the Decider/Commander Guy can blame someone else for his own failures yet again), I just don't see it in Bush's character to let go...

The whole "czar" thing is silly. As if the tsars were effective autocrats? Why would we pick the title of the most backward monarchy in Olde Europe for our "getting-things-done" guy?

Because for some reason, people have a negative reaction to having a "War Fuehrer"?

The whole "czar" thing is silly. As if the tsars were effective autocrats? Why would we pick the title of the most backward monarchy in Olde Europe for our "getting-things-done" guy?

As it turns out, this "czar" will have even less authority than the so-called autocrat, who was in practice a slave to his bureaucracy.

Lute would be a deputy NSA and 3-stars, including Colin Powell and John Poindexter, have held the NSA slot.

Yes, but were Powell and Pointexter chosen because they were better than the 4-stars, or because they were the first ones to not turn down the position?

They will be out before the next election.

Look to the Iraqis seeing the writing on the wall and moving away from the Us. After all, they have to live in the region after we leave them to their friendly neighbors.