working

POPULAR TAGS

 Outside the Beltway 

Majority of Americans Anti-American

John Quiggins gets off a very funny line here:

In the leadup to the Iraq war, we were repeatedly told that anyone who disagreed with the rush to war, or criticised the Bush Administration, was “anti-American”. It now appears that the majority of Americans are anti-American. A string of polls has shown that most Americans now realise that Bush and his Administration lied to get them into the war and that it was a mistake to go to war. The latest, reported in the NYT is this one from the Pew Research Centre.

It’s true that a majority of those surveyed in some polls now thinks the Iraq War was a mistake. Oddly, though, not the poll cited here, which shows 56% of the general public thinking “Efforts to establish a stable democracy will succeed.”

More significantly though, who exactly was “told that anyone who disagreed with the rush to war, or criticised the Bush Administration, was ‘anti-American’?”

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia with his wife and infant daughter.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

This was an interesting poll. I am not surprised to see the overwhelming consistency of the scientist/engineer cohort leaning liberal on all of the questions. I am a little surpised however at the religious leader cohort views on a number of issues, particularly their precipitious drop in approval of Bush.

There are no two groups of people with more divergent world views than religious leaders and practicing scientist/engineers so to see them agreeing on Bush is heartening.

Posted by ken | November 18, 2005 | 12:15 pm | Permalink
 

Don't get happy, ken. My suspicion is that the religious types were supporting Bush because of his openness to their hardest-of-hard right social conservatism. But as it becomes more apparent that the average American doesn't want to see abortion flatly outlawed and homosexuals strung up from trees, Congress will no longer dance to that tune. And if Bush can't deliver laws through Congress, he's no longer of any value to the evangelicals... just MHO.

Posted by legion | November 18, 2005 | 01:07 pm | Permalink
 

More significantly though, who exactly was "told that anyone who disagreed with the rush to war, or criticised the Bush Administration, was 'anti-American'?"

Under what rock have you been hiding for the past three or four years, James?

Posted by Len | November 18, 2005 | 01:56 pm | Permalink
 

More significantly though, who exactly was “told that anyone who disagreed with the rush to war, or criticised the Bush Administration, was ‘anti-American’?”

Just another one of those reactionary-left memes that gets asserted endlessly with nothing to back it up except, "Under what rock have you been hiding?" and the like. I'd tell the originator of this tactic to call his office, but using his name would be a Godwin violation.

Posted by McGehee | November 19, 2005 | 12:34 pm | Permalink
 

Ann Coulter made this claim at length in Treason. Similarly, David Horowitz here. Media Matters gives more examples.

Instapundit preferred the term "objectively pro-Saddam", which would have served equally well as an introductory line.

Posted by John Quiggin | November 22, 2005 | 03:26 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner

For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

FOLLOW US

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

MANzine logo

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2009 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.