<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Majority of Americans Anti-American</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/majority_of_americans_anti-american/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/majority_of_americans_anti-american/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:21:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/majority_of_americans_anti-american/comment-page-1/#comment-65780</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12709#comment-65780</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;dog sex&lt;/strong&gt;

sex with animals animalsex horse cock farm girls beast bestiality horse sex endangered animals horse sex bestiality horse suck horse sex zoophilia beastiality stories animal porn horse fuck dog breeds animal porn zoophilia dog dick in pussy zoophilia a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>dog sex</strong></p>
<p>sex with animals animalsex horse cock farm girls beast bestiality horse sex endangered animals horse sex bestiality horse suck horse sex zoophilia beastiality stories animal porn horse fuck dog breeds animal porn zoophilia dog dick in pussy zoophilia a...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Quiggin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/majority_of_americans_anti-american/comment-page-1/#comment-65509</link>
		<dc:creator>John Quiggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12709#comment-65509</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter made this claim at length in &lt;i&gt;Treason&lt;/i&gt;. Similarly, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=4811&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;David Horowitz&lt;/a&gt; here. &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200409200009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Media Matters&lt;/a&gt; gives more examples.

Instapundit preferred the term &quot;objectively pro-Saddam&quot;, which would have served equally well as an introductory line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter made this claim at length in <i>Treason</i>. Similarly, <a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=4811" rel="nofollow">David Horowitz</a> here. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200409200009" rel="nofollow">Media Matters</a> gives more examples.</p>
<p>Instapundit preferred the term "objectively pro-Saddam", which would have served equally well as an introductory line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/majority_of_americans_anti-american/comment-page-1/#comment-65171</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12709#comment-65171</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;More significantly though, who exactly was âtold that anyone who disagreed with the rush to war, or criticised the Bush Administration, was âanti-Americanâ?â&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just another one of those reactionary-left memes that gets asserted endlessly with nothing to back it up except, &quot;Under what rock have you been hiding?&quot; and the like. I&#039;d tell the originator of this tactic to call his office, but using his name would be a Godwin violation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More significantly though, who exactly was âtold that anyone who disagreed with the rush to war, or criticised the Bush Administration, was âanti-Americanâ?â</p></blockquote>
<p>Just another one of those reactionary-left memes that gets asserted endlessly with nothing to back it up except, "Under what rock have you been hiding?" and the like. I'd tell the originator of this tactic to call his office, but using his name would be a Godwin violation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/majority_of_americans_anti-american/comment-page-1/#comment-65049</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12709#comment-65049</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;More significantly though, who exactly was &quot;told that anyone who disagreed with the rush to war, or criticised the Bush Administration, was &#039;anti-American&#039;?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Under what rock have you been hiding for the past three or four years, James?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More significantly though, who exactly was "told that anyone who disagreed with the rush to war, or criticised the Bush Administration, was 'anti-American'?"</p></blockquote>
<p>Under what rock have you been hiding for the past three or four years, James?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/majority_of_americans_anti-american/comment-page-1/#comment-65036</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12709#comment-65036</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get happy, ken. My suspicion is that the religious types were supporting Bush because of his openness to their hardest-of-hard right social conservatism. But as it becomes more apparent that the average American doesn&#039;t want to see abortion flatly outlawed and homosexuals strung up from trees, Congress will no longer dance to that tune. And if Bush can&#039;t deliver laws through Congress, he&#039;s no longer of any value to the evangelicals... just MHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't get happy, ken. My suspicion is that the religious types were supporting Bush because of his openness to their hardest-of-hard right social conservatism. But as it becomes more apparent that the average American doesn't want to see abortion flatly outlawed and homosexuals strung up from trees, Congress will no longer dance to that tune. And if Bush can't deliver laws through Congress, he's no longer of any value to the evangelicals... just MHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/majority_of_americans_anti-american/comment-page-1/#comment-65025</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=12709#comment-65025</guid>
		<description>This was an interesting poll. I am not surprised to see the overwhelming consistency of the scientist/engineer cohort leaning liberal on all of the questions. I am a little surpised however at the religious leader cohort views on a number of issues, particularly their precipitious drop in approval of Bush. 

There are no two groups of people with more divergent world views than religious leaders and practicing scientist/engineers so to see them agreeing on Bush is heartening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an interesting poll. I am not surprised to see the overwhelming consistency of the scientist/engineer cohort leaning liberal on all of the questions. I am a little surpised however at the religious leader cohort views on a number of issues, particularly their precipitious drop in approval of Bush. </p>
<p>There are no two groups of people with more divergent world views than religious leaders and practicing scientist/engineers so to see them agreeing on Bush is heartening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
