Mark Cuban vs. SEC
UCLA corporate lawprof Stephen Bainbridge has gone from thinking that the SEC probably had a case against Mark Cuban to thinking they probably don’t, largely on the strength of Cuban’s presenting his case publicly on his “Blog Maverick” site.
But that raises another question: Should Cuban be conducting his defense in public on his blog?
If Cuban’s point is to clear his name with the public, the answer would seem to be an unequivocal Yes. If, however, his goal is to avoid alienating the goons at the SEC, causing them to spend tax dollars ginning up a case — any case — against him as payback for making them look bad, not so much. We’ve seen time and again that armies of government lawyers with unlimited resources pretty much always find something to charge high profile targets with, even if it’s seldom the thing they started out investigating.
- Mark Cuban vs. SEC
- Quote of the Day – Money Editions
- Ted Stevens Conviction Voided
- Obama Proposes New Cuba Policy Before Exiles
- Fiscal Straightjacket
- A Question of Stimulus
- McCain Raised $22 Million in June
- More of Why the Paulson Plan is Bad
- If We Build Three Really Large Pyramids…
- Biden Dog Breeder: ‘It’s Been Horrific Since December’
- Making Jobs More Expensive
- House Trades Freedom for Health Coverage, Senate’s Move
- Hasan a Muslim First, American Second?
- OTB Caption JamTM
- Taking “No” As Iran’s Answer
- Update on the Fort Hood Massacre
- OTB Latenight – Soft Cell
- Caption Contest Winners
- Breaking: Shootings at Fort Hood (Updated)
- Pentagon Expected To Ask For Supplementary War Funding. As Usual.
In my line of work they even go after the small fry. Regulators are often just hammers looking for nails to pound.












