<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MASTERING THE SENATE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mastering_the_senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mastering_the_senate/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:09:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mastering_the_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1317#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Indeed, the very idea that any president can &quot;get a grip&quot; on either chamber of congress is a tad silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, the very idea that any president can "get a grip" on either chamber of congress is a tad silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caleb</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mastering_the_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1317#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s funny, because what seems to go under the radar is CONGRESS&#039;s own incursion of separation of powers by undermining presidential power, like oh say, refusing to confirm his judicial nominations by threatening an unconstitutional filibuster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that's funny, because what seems to go under the radar is CONGRESS's own incursion of separation of powers by undermining presidential power, like oh say, refusing to confirm his judicial nominations by threatening an unconstitutional filibuster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mastering_the_senate/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1317#comment-372</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s gone under the radar screen; indeed, I reference it in most post and the post to which I link.

While I think the filibuster is unconstitutional, since it creates a need for a supermajority in cases other than the handful specified in the Constitution, it is a time-honored tradition that has not been overruled by any court that I&#039;m aware of.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think it's gone under the radar screen; indeed, I reference it in most post and the post to which I link.</p>
<p>While I think the filibuster is unconstitutional, since it creates a need for a supermajority in cases other than the handful specified in the Constitution, it is a time-honored tradition that has not been overruled by any court that I'm aware of.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
