<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Making Kerry Mistake on Vietnam?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:43:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410729</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410729</guid>
		<description>Yes there is a difference between strategic and tactical level. The two do overlap somewhat. When we made our tactical plans we often took into account the strategic implications of them. Someone with tactical level experience that understands the difference will most likely be better than someone with no tactical experience.

Mike 
The reason I said that was the time John ranted and rave about some A-team not shaving and he knew from his experience that there was no excuse for it. Maybe this particular A-team was wrong then again maybe not. There are times when it would be wise for a SF member not to shave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes there is a difference between strategic and tactical level. The two do overlap somewhat. When we made our tactical plans we often took into account the strategic implications of them. Someone with tactical level experience that understands the difference will most likely be better than someone with no tactical experience.</p>
<p>Mike<br />
The reason I said that was the time John ranted and rave about some A-team not shaving and he knew from his experience that there was no excuse for it. Maybe this particular A-team was wrong then again maybe not. There are times when it would be wise for a SF member not to shave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410520</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410520</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain was a Lieutenant Commander when he was flying in Viet Nam, which is hardly a &quot;junior naval aviator.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s not junior for a naval aviator but it&#039;s junior compared to commander-in-chief. He was still operating at the tactical level at that point rather than making strategic decisions.  

He got promoted twice while in captivity and then took on a training squadron and a congressional liaison assignment, excelling at both.  And, yes, he got selected for flag rank, so it was all-in-all quite an illustrious career.  

Still,  his strategic expertise comes from his years in the Senate, not his time in the Navy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>McCain was a Lieutenant Commander when he was flying in Viet Nam, which is hardly a "junior naval aviator." </p></blockquote>
<p>It's not junior for a naval aviator but it's junior compared to commander-in-chief. He was still operating at the tactical level at that point rather than making strategic decisions.  </p>
<p>He got promoted twice while in captivity and then took on a training squadron and a congressional liaison assignment, excelling at both.  And, yes, he got selected for flag rank, so it was all-in-all quite an illustrious career.  </p>
<p>Still,  his strategic expertise comes from his years in the Senate, not his time in the Navy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410514</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410514</guid>
		<description>Hal - I didn&#039;t think about that, but yes, throw them in as well - I suspect McCain will listen to them as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hal - I didn't think about that, but yes, throw them in as well - I suspect McCain will listen to them as well...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410512</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410512</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;rather than listening to political hacks and appointees&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;m assuming you&#039;re not counting high powered lobbyists in that set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>rather than listening to political hacks and appointees</em></p>
<p>I'm assuming you're not counting high powered lobbyists in that set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410509</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410509</guid>
		<description>Wayne - your right his experience as an aviator doesn&#039;t equal knowing what it is to be SF, however, he likely learned that he needs to listen to the experts in each branch unlike the current yahoo or the previous one, rather than listening to political hacks and appointees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne - your right his experience as an aviator doesn't equal knowing what it is to be SF, however, he likely learned that he needs to listen to the experts in each branch unlike the current yahoo or the previous one, rather than listening to political hacks and appointees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410481</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410481</guid>
		<description>McCain’s military experience is relevant but I agree that it could be counterproductive if he concentrates on it too much like Kerry did. By the way Kerry’s experience wasn’t as great as many pretended it was.  If McCain just uses it as one of many factures without making it the primary reason then it will help. 

I watch McCain in Senate hearings and one thing that perturbs me about McCain when it comes to his military experience, is that he seems to think that his experience translate across all branches and all MOS’s. There are common experiences throughout the military but there are differences also.  To think as a Naval Aviator to know what it is like to do the job of a Marine Infantryman or  Army SF soldier is just plain wrong. Yes he knows what it is like to be a P.O.W. but that is not the same as doing the job of a SF soldier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain&rsquo;s military experience is relevant but I agree that it could be counterproductive if he concentrates on it too much like Kerry did. By the way Kerry&rsquo;s experience wasn&rsquo;t as great as many pretended it was.  If McCain just uses it as one of many factures without making it the primary reason then it will help. </p>
<p>I watch McCain in Senate hearings and one thing that perturbs me about McCain when it comes to his military experience, is that he seems to think that his experience translate across all branches and all MOS&rsquo;s. There are common experiences throughout the military but there are differences also.  To think as a Naval Aviator to know what it is like to do the job of a Marine Infantryman or  Army SF soldier is just plain wrong. Yes he knows what it is like to be a P.O.W. but that is not the same as doing the job of a SF soldier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410462</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410462</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I know Kerry was a goner when he came out with the salute at the &#039;04 convention. Lame, lame, lame.&lt;/em&gt;

At least Kerry didn&#039;t look like a Disney animatronic with pathetically bad makeup.  Small consolation, I agree...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I know Kerry was a goner when he came out with the salute at the '04 convention. Lame, lame, lame.</em></p>
<p>At least Kerry didn't look like a Disney animatronic with pathetically bad makeup.  Small consolation, I agree...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410453</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410453</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The election is about 2009 and beyond, not 1967.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

2009 and beyond... I wonder.

Much like Bush, McCain&#039;s vision of American seems to be a return to the 19th century and earlier, when we were a nation compose of rich folks, who mattered, and everyone one else, who mattered a whole lot less.

As for the Vietnam card, he has already badly overplayed it. I know Kerry was a goner when he came out with the salute at the &#039;04 convention. Lame, lame, lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The election is about 2009 and beyond, not 1967.</p></blockquote>
<p>2009 and beyond... I wonder.</p>
<p>Much like Bush, McCain's vision of American seems to be a return to the 19th century and earlier, when we were a nation compose of rich folks, who mattered, and everyone one else, who mattered a whole lot less.</p>
<p>As for the Vietnam card, he has already badly overplayed it. I know Kerry was a goner when he came out with the salute at the '04 convention. Lame, lame, lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410449</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410449</guid>
		<description>Not that I disagree with your overall point, but you and Lang make similar mention to McCain&#039;s &quot;juniorness&quot; which I believe hits wide of the mark.

McCain was a Lieutenant Commander when he was flying in Viet Nam, which is hardly a &quot;junior naval aviator.&quot; Undoubtedly, the Commanding Officer of his squadron was a Commander, merely one rank senior.

And further, McCain&#039;s Navy experience was much more than a junior officer; he had commanded his own squadron and had been selected for Rear Admiral (Lower Half) by the time he retired.

Granted, I&#039;m just being anal at this point, because I don&#039;t disagree at all that going on about his time as a POW will ultimately be counter-productive for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I disagree with your overall point, but you and Lang make similar mention to McCain's "juniorness" which I believe hits wide of the mark.</p>
<p>McCain was a Lieutenant Commander when he was flying in Viet Nam, which is hardly a "junior naval aviator." Undoubtedly, the Commanding Officer of his squadron was a Commander, merely one rank senior.</p>
<p>And further, McCain's Navy experience was much more than a junior officer; he had commanded his own squadron and had been selected for Rear Admiral (Lower Half) by the time he retired.</p>
<p>Granted, I'm just being anal at this point, because I don't disagree at all that going on about his time as a POW will ultimately be counter-productive for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410441</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410441</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But banging us over the head constantly with the fact that he went to Vietnam won’t get him elected president.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Exactly what I said back back in January of this year:

&lt;blockquote&gt;And by the way, John… You been talking to Kerry about the political value of having ’served in Vietnam’? Don’t go changing your name, like he did, OK?&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But banging us over the head constantly with the fact that he went to Vietnam won&rsquo;t get him elected president.</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly what I said back back in January of this year:</p>
<blockquote><p>And by the way, John… You been talking to Kerry about the political value of having &rsquo;served in Vietnam&rsquo;? Don&rsquo;t go changing your name, like he did, OK?</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410434</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410434</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s more complicated than that... By constantly emphasizing things that happened 30+ years ago, no matter how &quot;good&quot; for his electoral base, he opens the door to examining _everything_ from that era - especially his divorce &amp; marital conduct. _McCain&#039;s_ the one who&#039;s made that fair game. Also, it reminds people of the age thing. That&#039;s two big negatives Kerry didn&#039;t have to worry about when talking up his own Vietnam experience...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's more complicated than that... By constantly emphasizing things that happened 30+ years ago, no matter how "good" for his electoral base, he opens the door to examining _everything_ from that era - especially his divorce &amp; marital conduct. _McCain's_ the one who's made that fair game. Also, it reminds people of the age thing. That's two big negatives Kerry didn't have to worry about when talking up his own Vietnam experience...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/comment-page-1/#comment-410433</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/mccain_making_kerry_mistake_on_vietnam/#comment-410433</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The election is about 2009 and beyond, not 1967&lt;/em&gt;

You run with the record you have, not with the vision you&#039;d like to have.  He&#039;s chosen the &quot;experience&quot; card (and, I might add, so have you, James).  Maybe he&#039;ll get wise and deal another hand, but that seems unlikely with this team, still thinking that divine providence got them the nomination and divine providence will get them the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The election is about 2009 and beyond, not 1967</em></p>
<p>You run with the record you have, not with the vision you'd like to have.  He's chosen the "experience" card (and, I might add, so have you, James).  Maybe he'll get wise and deal another hand, but that seems unlikely with this team, still thinking that divine providence got them the nomination and divine providence will get them the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
