<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Slams Obama for Dissing Troops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:18:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Moomaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-486994</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Moomaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-486994</guid>
		<description>Actually, on June 28, he DID visit wounded troops at Walter Reed -- while refusing to bring cameras along.  Which would seem to support Michael&#039;s explanation.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/06/28/obama-quietly-visits-veterans-at-walter-reed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(See the &quot;Fox News&quot; &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/28/obama-visits-walter-reed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CNN&lt;/a&gt; accounts.)

You know, this sort of thing just may explain why so many of those notorious ultra-liberal folks that Bithead hates -- such as Joe Klein, Sen. Hagel, &quot;USA Today&quot; and Business Week magazine -- are saying that they find McCain&#039;s campaign strategy increasingly nauseating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, on June 28, he DID visit wounded troops at Walter Reed -- while refusing to bring cameras along.  Which would seem to support Michael's explanation.  <a href="http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/06/28/obama-quietly-visits-veterans-at-walter-reed/" rel="nofollow">(See the "Fox News" </a> and <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/28/obama-visits-walter-reed/" rel="nofollow">CNN</a> accounts.)</p>
<p>You know, this sort of thing just may explain why so many of those notorious ultra-liberal folks that Bithead hates -- such as Joe Klein, Sen. Hagel, "USA Today" and Business Week magazine -- are saying that they find McCain's campaign strategy increasingly nauseating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-478145</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-478145</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Elections are anything but a process dominated by deep thinkers -we wouldn&#039;t be in the trouble we&#039;re in if that were true.&lt;/blockquote&gt;No, we&#039;d likely be in much worse trouble.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama&#039;s and the Dem&#039;s argument is that they hate the war, love the troops. Oh, really? What about blowing off wounded troops when campaigning abroad?&lt;/blockquote&gt;If that was the narrative McCain wanted, he shouldn&#039;t have admitted the Pentagon&#039;s role in his ad.

&lt;blockquote&gt;He could have visited them with no fanfare whatsoever it wouldn&#039;t have been seen as political because it wouldn&#039;t have been &quot;seen&quot; period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Actually, the Press was welcome to tag along, so he could have been &quot;seen&quot; just fine.  But he could not have brought anybody on his campaign staff, which is all the staff he brought on the trip.  Logistically, it would have been a nightmare for him to try and do this without support staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Elections are anything but a process dominated by deep thinkers -we wouldn't be in the trouble we're in if that were true.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, we'd likely be in much worse trouble.</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama's and the Dem's argument is that they hate the war, love the troops. Oh, really? What about blowing off wounded troops when campaigning abroad?</p></blockquote>
<p>If that was the narrative McCain wanted, he shouldn't have admitted the Pentagon's role in his ad.</p>
<blockquote><p>He could have visited them with no fanfare whatsoever it wouldn't have been seen as political because it wouldn't have been "seen" period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, the Press was welcome to tag along, so he could have been "seen" just fine.  But he could not have brought anybody on his campaign staff, which is all the staff he brought on the trip.  Logistically, it would have been a nightmare for him to try and do this without support staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-477424</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-477424</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I can never remember whether those are the ones coming from the top of the cave or the bottom.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The Obamites come from the floor.  You can remember because they might reach the White House.  The Obatites come from the ceiling and need to hold on tight so they don&#039;t fall on ex friends or associates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I can never remember whether those are the ones coming from the top of the cave or the bottom.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Obamites come from the floor.  You can remember because they might reach the White House.  The Obatites come from the ceiling and need to hold on tight so they don't fall on ex friends or associates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476894</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476894</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obama Slammed for Skipping Out on Troops...&lt;/strong&gt;

John McCain&#039;s campaign is slamming Barack Obama&#039;s decision not to visit the troops in Landstuhl, Germany when he couldn&#039;t take his campaign staff. James Joyner at Outside the Beltway takes issue with this being a weak attack on Obama. I...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obama Slammed for Skipping Out on Troops...</strong></p>
<p>John McCain's campaign is slamming Barack Obama's decision not to visit the troops in Landstuhl, Germany when he couldn't take his campaign staff. James Joyner at Outside the Beltway takes issue with this being a weak attack on Obama. I...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476841</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476841</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;True or just more Obamite misinformation (or lies)&lt;/em&gt;

Well, let&#039;s see.  If &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/28/politics/main4216681.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;he&#039;s been doing a heck of a lot of visits with the wounded&lt;/a&gt; (McCain does, too, btw), then who would be spreading the lies?  Oh, that&#039;s right.  It would be the wives, sons, daughters, relatives and parents of the wounded, or even the wounded themselves!

Now, davod, is that the kind of rumor you want to start?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>True or just more Obamite misinformation (or lies)</em></p>
<p>Well, let's see.  If <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/28/politics/main4216681.shtml" rel="nofollow">he's been doing a heck of a lot of visits with the wounded</a> (McCain does, too, btw), then who would be spreading the lies?  Oh, that's right.  It would be the wives, sons, daughters, relatives and parents of the wounded, or even the wounded themselves!</p>
<p>Now, davod, is that the kind of rumor you want to start?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476834</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476834</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I can never remember whether those are the ones coming from the top of the cave or the bottom.&lt;/em&gt;

roflmao!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I can never remember whether those are the ones coming from the top of the cave or the bottom.</em></p>
<p>roflmao!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Stunningly Dishonest Campaign Ad &#124; Comments from Left Field</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476783</link>
		<dc:creator>A Stunningly Dishonest Campaign Ad &#124; Comments from Left Field</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476783</guid>
		<description>[...] Outside the Beltway: This strikes me as a weak attack and a poor campaign strategy. First, Obama can rightly blame the Pentagon for the canceled trip even though it’s technically true that he was free to go in his capacity as a United States Senator if he left his campaign staff and camera crew behind. Second, my guess is that those who are going to vote on the basis of such things are already in McCain’s camp. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outside the Beltway: This strikes me as a weak attack and a poor campaign strategy. First, Obama can rightly blame the Pentagon for the canceled trip even though it&rsquo;s technically true that he was free to go in his capacity as a United States Senator if he left his campaign staff and camera crew behind. Second, my guess is that those who are going to vote on the basis of such things are already in McCain&rsquo;s camp. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Stunningly Dishonest Campaign Ad &#171; Liberty Street</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476778</link>
		<dc:creator>A Stunningly Dishonest Campaign Ad &#171; Liberty Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476778</guid>
		<description>[...] Outside the Beltway: This strikes me as a weak attack and a poor campaign strategy. First, Obama can rightly blame the Pentagon for the canceled trip even though it’s technically true that he was free to go in his capacity as a United States Senator if he left his campaign staff and camera crew behind. Second, my guess is that those who are going to vote on the basis of such things are already in McCain’s camp. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outside the Beltway: This strikes me as a weak attack and a poor campaign strategy. First, Obama can rightly blame the Pentagon for the canceled trip even though it&rsquo;s technically true that he was free to go in his capacity as a United States Senator if he left his campaign staff and camera crew behind. Second, my guess is that those who are going to vote on the basis of such things are already in McCain&rsquo;s camp. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davod</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476759</link>
		<dc:creator>davod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476759</guid>
		<description>&quot;Perhaps. But then he&#039;s been doing a heck of a lot of visits to the wounded behind the scenes and that doesn&#039;t go unnoticed in the grass roots gossip networks.&quot; 

True or just more Obamite misinformation (or lies).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Perhaps. But then he's been doing a heck of a lot of visits to the wounded behind the scenes and that doesn't go unnoticed in the grass roots gossip networks." </p>
<p>True or just more Obamite misinformation (or lies).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davod</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476758</link>
		<dc:creator>davod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476758</guid>
		<description>What is wrong with Obamites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is wrong with Obamites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476709</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476709</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think anyone who uses the term &quot;Obamites&quot; has pretty much already conceded the argument.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I can never remember whether those are the ones coming from the top of the cave or the bottom.  I know one holds on tight and the other with all their might, but that&#039;s never really helped me resolve the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think anyone who uses the term "Obamites" has pretty much already conceded the argument.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can never remember whether those are the ones coming from the top of the cave or the bottom.  I know one holds on tight and the other with all their might, but that's never really helped me resolve the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anjin-san</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476633</link>
		<dc:creator>anjin-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476633</guid>
		<description>I think if we are going to discuss &quot;supporting the troops&quot; let&#039;s remember that McCain is working to deny educational benefits for the troops that the democrats want to implement. 

Also let us remember that McCain&#039;s good friend President Bush has fought hard to deny mental health benefits to the troops, despite soaring suicide rates among combat vets.

I think most vets would prefer to have the health and educational benefits that the GOP is denying them to a handshake from a politican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if we are going to discuss "supporting the troops" let's remember that McCain is working to deny educational benefits for the troops that the democrats want to implement. </p>
<p>Also let us remember that McCain's good friend President Bush has fought hard to deny mental health benefits to the troops, despite soaring suicide rates among combat vets.</p>
<p>I think most vets would prefer to have the health and educational benefits that the GOP is denying them to a handshake from a politican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fence</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476548</link>
		<dc:creator>Fence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476548</guid>
		<description>I wonder what sort of support most troops appreciate more, a paid college education or a having some pol disturb their morning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what sort of support most troops appreciate more, a paid college education or a having some pol disturb their morning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476519</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476519</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;[U]sing “the troops” as part of a political message risks coming across as unseemly. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Look, McCain and Co. got augered down pretty good on their &quot;We dare Obama to go to Iraq&quot; petard. And boy does it smart. So, in a feeble attempt at repoiste, we get this. Folks who think the shuck and jive in this ad is brilliant politics are in for a surprise. Think GI Bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>[U]sing “the troops” as part of a political message risks coming across as unseemly. </p></blockquote>
<p>Look, McCain and Co. got augered down pretty good on their "We dare Obama to go to Iraq" petard. And boy does it smart. So, in a feeble attempt at repoiste, we get this. Folks who think the shuck and jive in this ad is brilliant politics are in for a surprise. Think GI Bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccain_slams_obama_for_dissing_troops/comment-page-1/#comment-476487</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=24603#comment-476487</guid>
		<description>Hey, how&#039;s that withdraw timetable coming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, how's that withdraw timetable coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
