<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain&#8217;s Promise to Cut Medicare Premiums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccains_promise_to_cut_medicare_premiums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccains_promise_to_cut_medicare_premiums/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:10:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccains_promise_to_cut_medicare_premiums/comment-page-1/#comment-266580</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/mccains_promise_to_cut_medicare_premiums/#comment-266580</guid>
		<description>Sigh, so much for straight talk.  And I thought McCain was going to turn Medicare into a profit center so we could afford to pay for those 100 more years in Iraq.  (If McCain gets the nomination, be ready to hear that &quot;100 years&quot; quote mush more than we heard &quot;I was for the $87 billion before I was against it&quot;.  Probably about 100 times more).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh, so much for straight talk.  And I thought McCain was going to turn Medicare into a profit center so we could afford to pay for those 100 more years in Iraq.  (If McCain gets the nomination, be ready to hear that "100 years" quote mush more than we heard "I was for the $87 billion before I was against it".  Probably about 100 times more).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccains_promise_to_cut_medicare_premiums/comment-page-1/#comment-266461</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/01/mccains_promise_to_cut_medicare_premiums/#comment-266461</guid>
		<description>There are lots of asymmetries in healthcare, not just between companies and individuals but between large companies and small companies.  Our current system is a substantial subsidy to large companies that are more capable of and likely to self-insure.  Indeed, the decision to self-insure is one of the things that big companies are complaining about.  The faster costs rise the poorer their decision was.

And there&#039;s more than one way to achieve symmetry.  You&#039;ve outlined one way.  I think the more likely approach will be to limit the deductability of healthcare by employers, just as it is for individuals.  My own preference would be to have benefits, including employer-provided healthcare, declared as income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of asymmetries in healthcare, not just between companies and individuals but between large companies and small companies.  Our current system is a substantial subsidy to large companies that are more capable of and likely to self-insure.  Indeed, the decision to self-insure is one of the things that big companies are complaining about.  The faster costs rise the poorer their decision was.</p>
<p>And there's more than one way to achieve symmetry.  You've outlined one way.  I think the more likely approach will be to limit the deductability of healthcare by employers, just as it is for individuals.  My own preference would be to have benefits, including employer-provided healthcare, declared as income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
