<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCartney Divorce Settlement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:02:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-304435</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-304435</guid>
		<description>Actually, gang, there&#039;s a reason why Post-Beatles Mccartney never came up with another money song. Indded, more than one. First, he wasnt worried about it anymore being bloody well rich himself, and anyway, the one who was far more concerned about money was John... the socialist of the group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, gang, there's a reason why Post-Beatles Mccartney never came up with another money song. Indded, more than one. First, he wasnt worried about it anymore being bloody well rich himself, and anyway, the one who was far more concerned about money was John... the socialist of the group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-304325</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-304325</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;There were quite a few big ones on “Band on the Run” alone.&lt;/em&gt;

I guess I&#039;ve been blocking all of that out. I stand corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There were quite a few big ones on “Band on the Run” alone.</em></p>
<p>I guess I've been blocking all of that out. I stand corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-304257</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-304257</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wings_(band)#Singles&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wingles&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wings_(band)#Singles" rel="nofollow">Wingles</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hln</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-303729</link>
		<dc:creator>hln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-303729</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m embarrassed to share a name with that woman.  She was pouty about her four-year-old child receiving only 70k per year for merely existing.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;
The judgment included £35,000 ($70,000) a year for the couple&#039;s 4-year-old daughter, Beatrice. Mills said she was unhappy with that amount because it isn&#039;t enough for school tuition, private security, or first-class airfare. 

&quot;He likes her to fly five times a year on holiday,&quot; Mills said of McCartney. &quot;It&#039;s £17,000 for two people return (round-trip) first class, so that&#039;s obviously not meant to happen for her anymore. It&#039;s very sad.&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What I read out of that is that Ms. Mills won&#039;t use any of her own money to alleviate said sadness.  I didn&#039;t know whether to laugh or cry - is it really possible to be greedy after receiving 24.3 million pounds? I guess so.

hln</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm embarrassed to share a name with that woman.  She was pouty about her four-year-old child receiving only 70k per year for merely existing.  </p>
<blockquote><p>
The judgment included £35,000 ($70,000) a year for the couple's 4-year-old daughter, Beatrice. Mills said she was unhappy with that amount because it isn't enough for school tuition, private security, or first-class airfare. </p>
<p>"He likes her to fly five times a year on holiday," Mills said of McCartney. "It's £17,000 for two people return (round-trip) first class, so that's obviously not meant to happen for her anymore. It's very sad."
</p></blockquote>
<p>What I read out of that is that Ms. Mills won't use any of her own money to alleviate said sadness.  I didn't know whether to laugh or cry - is it really possible to be greedy after receiving 24.3 million pounds? I guess so.</p>
<p>hln</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tlaloc</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-303722</link>
		<dc:creator>Tlaloc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-303722</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Perhaps I’m taking “All” too literally but I’ve always regarded it as an anti-materialistic message.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree as to the anti-materialistic message, but why, when that matches the earlier stuff, would you then call that a newfound economic consciousness?

Seems like you should lump in &quot;All you need is Love&quot; with the earlier works and single out &quot;Money&quot; as indicating a change in position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Perhaps I&rsquo;m taking “All” too literally but I&rsquo;ve always regarded it as an anti-materialistic message.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree as to the anti-materialistic message, but why, when that matches the earlier stuff, would you then call that a newfound economic consciousness?</p>
<p>Seems like you should lump in "All you need is Love" with the earlier works and single out "Money" as indicating a change in position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lunacy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-303694</link>
		<dc:creator>lunacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-303694</guid>
		<description>Memorable post-Beatles McCartney songs.

Maybe I&#039;m Amazed
Band on the Run
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey
Heart of the Country
Listen to What the Man Said
Silly Love Songs
My Love
Junior&#039;s Farm
With a Little Luck
Jet
Coming Up


This is what I came up with off the top of my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memorable post-Beatles McCartney songs.</p>
<p>Maybe I'm Amazed<br />
Band on the Run<br />
Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey<br />
Heart of the Country<br />
Listen to What the Man Said<br />
Silly Love Songs<br />
My Love<br />
Junior's Farm<br />
With a Little Luck<br />
Jet<br />
Coming Up</p>
<p>This is what I came up with off the top of my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-303667</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-303667</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Other than “Live and Let Die”, can you recall a post-Beatles hit involving Wings regardless of theme? For that matter, can you recall any other genuine hit involving McCartney between The Beatles and “Ebony &amp; Ivory”?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, while John Lennon earned far more critical acclaim, McCartney had a slew of hits.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/bio/index.jsp?pid=5162&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Billboard&lt;/a&gt;:


&lt;blockquote&gt;Out of all the former Beatles, Paul McCartney by far had the most successful solo career, maintaining a constant presence in the British and American charts during the &#039;70s and &#039;80s. In America alone, he had nine number one singles and seven number one albums during the first 12 years of his solo career.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There were quite a few big ones on &quot;Band on the Run&quot; alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Other than “Live and Let Die”, can you recall a post-Beatles hit involving Wings regardless of theme? For that matter, can you recall any other genuine hit involving McCartney between The Beatles and “Ebony &#038; Ivory”?</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, while John Lennon earned far more critical acclaim, McCartney had a slew of hits.  <a href="http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/bio/index.jsp?pid=5162" rel="nofollow">Billboard</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Out of all the former Beatles, Paul McCartney by far had the most successful solo career, maintaining a constant presence in the British and American charts during the '70s and '80s. In America alone, he had nine number one singles and seven number one albums during the first 12 years of his solo career.</p></blockquote>
<p>There were quite a few big ones on "Band on the Run" alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-303606</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-303606</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m missing the “economic consciousness” in that lyric…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps I&#039;m taking &quot;All&quot; too literally but I&#039;ve always regarded it as an anti-materialistic message.

In &quot;Money,&quot; we&#039;re told that money&#039;s value trumps that of love, which is merely thrilling but doesn&#039;t pay the bills.  In &quot;Love is All You Need,&quot; though, that consideration no longer applies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&rsquo;m missing the “economic consciousness” in that lyric…</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps I'm taking "All" too literally but I've always regarded it as an anti-materialistic message.</p>
<p>In "Money," we're told that money's value trumps that of love, which is merely thrilling but doesn't pay the bills.  In "Love is All You Need," though, that consideration no longer applies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tlaloc</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-303585</link>
		<dc:creator>Tlaloc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-303585</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In “All You Need Is Love,” written when McCartney and his songwriting partner John Lennon were wealthy and newly married, they inform us that, 


There’s nothing you can make that can’t be made.
No one you can save that can’t be saved.
Nothing you can do but you can learn how to be in time
It’s easy.
All you need is love, all you need is love.

Presumably, hallucinogenics drugs also contributed to this newfound economic consciousness. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m missing the &quot;economic consciousness&quot; in that lyric...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In “All You Need Is Love,” written when McCartney and his songwriting partner John Lennon were wealthy and newly married, they inform us that, </p>
<p>There&rsquo;s nothing you can make that can&rsquo;t be made.<br />
No one you can save that can&rsquo;t be saved.<br />
Nothing you can do but you can learn how to be in time<br />
It&rsquo;s easy.<br />
All you need is love, all you need is love.</p>
<p>Presumably, hallucinogenics drugs also contributed to this newfound economic consciousness.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I'm missing the "economic consciousness" in that lyric...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-303532</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-303532</guid>
		<description>The changed attitudes towards filthy lucre were already evident on 1965&#039;s &quot;Taxman.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The changed attitudes towards filthy lucre were already evident on 1965's "Taxman."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/mccartney_divorce_settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-303523</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/03/mccartney_divorce_settlement/#comment-303523</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I can’t recall any post-Beatles hits with that theme&lt;/em&gt;

Other than &quot;Live and Let Die&quot;, can you recall a post-Beatles hit involving Wings regardless of theme? For that matter, can you recall any other genuine hit involving McCartney between The Beatles and &quot;Ebony &amp; Ivory&quot;? 

He broke the charts here and there but, really, Wings is mostly a bad dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I can&rsquo;t recall any post-Beatles hits with that theme</em></p>
<p>Other than "Live and Let Die", can you recall a post-Beatles hit involving Wings regardless of theme? For that matter, can you recall any other genuine hit involving McCartney between The Beatles and "Ebony &#038; Ivory"? </p>
<p>He broke the charts here and there but, really, Wings is mostly a bad dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
