<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Matters Dings Drudge for AP Error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/media_matters_dings_drudge_for_ap_error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/media_matters_dings_drudge_for_ap_error/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:46:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Maguire</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/media_matters_dings_drudge_for_ap_error/comment-page-1/#comment-42726</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10055#comment-42726</guid>
		<description>As a bonus, the Times has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/13/international/13name.html?pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot;&gt;follow-up &lt;/a&gt;with this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Though Mr. Armstrong had been identified in news reports two years ago about his dispute with other officials over intelligence involving Cuba, that was when he was the national intelligence officer for Latin America, and his name was no secret. **When the Bolton nomination resurrected the old accounts, however, the C.I.A. asked news organizations to withhold his name.**

On Monday, Mr. Lugar announced that aides on the Foreign Relations committee had interviewed Mr. Armstrong. Later, Mr. Kerry mentioned him by name while questioning Mr. Bolton. The hearings were televised, and transcripts were widely published. On Tuesday morning, The Associated Press mentioned the disclosure and identified Mr. Armstrong.

...At a time when a special prosecutor is investigating how the identity of another undercover C.I.A. officer, Valerie Plame, was leaked to the press, the disclosure of Mr. Armstrong&#039;s name did not go unnoticed by reporters on Capitol Hill. Asked about it on Tuesday, Mr. Lugar said simply, &quot;No comment.&quot;

Mr. Kerry defended himself. &quot;Senator Lugar had already mentioned it,&quot; he said, &quot;and it had already been in the press.&quot; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

So I guess Lugar screwed up first.  But as the Times notes, it is interesting to see just how seriously the Senators took the CIA request for discretion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a bonus, the Times has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/13/international/13name.html?pagewanted=print&#038;position=">follow-up </a>with this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Though Mr. Armstrong had been identified in news reports two years ago about his dispute with other officials over intelligence involving Cuba, that was when he was the national intelligence officer for Latin America, and his name was no secret. **When the Bolton nomination resurrected the old accounts, however, the C.I.A. asked news organizations to withhold his name.**</p>
<p>On Monday, Mr. Lugar announced that aides on the Foreign Relations committee had interviewed Mr. Armstrong. Later, Mr. Kerry mentioned him by name while questioning Mr. Bolton. The hearings were televised, and transcripts were widely published. On Tuesday morning, The Associated Press mentioned the disclosure and identified Mr. Armstrong.</p>
<p>...At a time when a special prosecutor is investigating how the identity of another undercover C.I.A. officer, Valerie Plame, was leaked to the press, the disclosure of Mr. Armstrong's name did not go unnoticed by reporters on Capitol Hill. Asked about it on Tuesday, Mr. Lugar said simply, "No comment."</p>
<p>Mr. Kerry defended himself. "Senator Lugar had already mentioned it," he said, "and it had already been in the press." </p></blockquote>
<p>So I guess Lugar screwed up first.  But as the Times notes, it is interesting to see just how seriously the Senators took the CIA request for discretion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/media_matters_dings_drudge_for_ap_error/comment-page-1/#comment-42694</link>
		<dc:creator>bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10055#comment-42694</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t gotten the transcripts yet, but a big question in my mind on all of this is which of the two, did it first?  First blood is the most damaging, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't gotten the transcripts yet, but a big question in my mind on all of this is which of the two, did it first?  First blood is the most damaging, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/media_matters_dings_drudge_for_ap_error/comment-page-1/#comment-42693</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=10055#comment-42693</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Frankly, Matt Drudge does something several times of week worthy of scorn. But linking to an AP story and pulling out the juicest &quot;fact&quot; from it is not among them.&lt;/i&gt;

But it&#039;s the one that made John Kerry -- however briefly -- look bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Frankly, Matt Drudge does something several times of week worthy of scorn. But linking to an AP story and pulling out the juicest "fact" from it is not among them.</i></p>
<p>But it's the one that made John Kerry -- however briefly -- look bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
