<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meryl&#8217;s Blogiversary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:06:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: michele</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15687</link>
		<dc:creator>michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15687</guid>
		<description>John&#039;s post stopped being substantive when he referred to his female companions as &quot;easy on the eyes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John's post stopped being substantive when he referred to his female companions as "easy on the eyes."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15688</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15688</guid>
		<description>It &lt;i&gt;stopped&lt;/i&gt; being substantive? When did it start being substantive? I read Hawkins&#039; post as 100% spoof with a little bit of butt-kissing to a few of his blog-favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It <i>stopped</i> being substantive? When did it start being substantive? I read Hawkins' post as 100% spoof with a little bit of butt-kissing to a few of his blog-favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15689</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15689</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Jen on this one--I didn&#039;t think it was a serious post.  Hell, it&#039;s not even a serious topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm with Jen on this one--I didn't think it was a serious post.  Hell, it's not even a serious topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15690</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15690</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of the prominent bloggers, I canât think of a single male that writes more than occasionally about his family life, his feelings, or the like.&quot;

What about Lileks?  While they might not be a blog, his bleats come pretty damn close and get some wide play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Of the prominent bloggers, I canât think of a single male that writes more than occasionally about his family life, his feelings, or the like."</p>
<p>What about Lileks?  While they might not be a blog, his bleats come pretty damn close and get some wide play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15691</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15691</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I didn&#039;t think of Lileks, since he doesn&#039;t post in a normal blog format.  He is an exception; I&#039;m sure there are others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I didn't think of Lileks, since he doesn't post in a normal blog format.  He is an exception; I'm sure there are others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15692</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15692</guid>
		<description>Vinny has been posting about his weight loss fairly often on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insignificantthoughts.com&quot;&gt;insignificant thoughts&lt;/a&gt;.  That&#039;s fairly personal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vinny has been posting about his weight loss fairly often on <a href="http://www.insignificantthoughts.com">insignificant thoughts</a>.  That's fairly personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15693</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15693</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Vinny is in the top 100 and I don&#039;t read him in any event.

Several of the top male bloggers--Dean Esmay, Dodd Harris, Stephen Green--have posted on reasonably personal matters.  It&#039;s just not as central to their blogs as it is for most of the top female bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think Vinny is in the top 100 and I don't read him in any event.</p>
<p>Several of the top male bloggers--Dean Esmay, Dodd Harris, Stephen Green--have posted on reasonably personal matters.  It's just not as central to their blogs as it is for most of the top female bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michele</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15694</link>
		<dc:creator>michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15694</guid>
		<description>Well, I did the math and it looks like I wrote about my boobies three times in the past year - and context is necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I did the math and it looks like I wrote about my boobies three times in the past year - and context is necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maura</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15695</link>
		<dc:creator>maura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15695</guid>
		<description>If men are under no obligation to hide themselves, their gender, or their sexuality, why should women be?  To level some imaginary playing field?  Sounds like a double standard to me, being maintained *not* by - ahem - men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If men are under no obligation to hide themselves, their gender, or their sexuality, why should women be?  To level some imaginary playing field?  Sounds like a double standard to me, being maintained *not* by - ahem - men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15696</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15696</guid>
		<description>maura,

I&#039;m not arguing that women should hide their gender or sexuality, merely that if their sexuality is part of their blog conversation then it&#039;s a part of the conversation within the blogosphere.  

Megan McArdle is stunningly good looking. It almost never comes into the discussion about her blog posts, though, because it&#039;s not a part of her blog. Her posts are almost entirely analytical (indeed, more so than mine, in that I&#039;ve got at least occasional pop culture stuff and other low-substance material) and the reaction to them is almost entirely on the analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maura,</p>
<p>I'm not arguing that women should hide their gender or sexuality, merely that if their sexuality is part of their blog conversation then it's a part of the conversation within the blogosphere.  </p>
<p>Megan McArdle is stunningly good looking. It almost never comes into the discussion about her blog posts, though, because it's not a part of her blog. Her posts are almost entirely analytical (indeed, more so than mine, in that I've got at least occasional pop culture stuff and other low-substance material) and the reaction to them is almost entirely on the analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15697</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15697</guid>
		<description>Read until I got here:

&quot;This isnât a function of womenâs opinions getting less respect than menâs but rather the fact that the list is dominated by political blogs, a category which naturally attracts more male writers.&quot;

What a bunch of BS. 

Women write about politics as much, but they do so more quietly, and usually with less interest in celebrating death and destruction...and with less pontificating. Probably because women weren&#039;t encouraged to play with toy soldiers when they were younger, so they don&#039;t carry this fixation into their adulthood. Unlike so many of the guys. 

Most of the guys who write about politics do so because this is their last chance to be the jock at the school prom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read until I got here:</p>
<p>"This isnât a function of womenâs opinions getting less respect than menâs but rather the fact that the list is dominated by political blogs, a category which naturally attracts more male writers."</p>
<p>What a bunch of BS. </p>
<p>Women write about politics as much, but they do so more quietly, and usually with less interest in celebrating death and destruction...and with less pontificating. Probably because women weren't encouraged to play with toy soldiers when they were younger, so they don't carry this fixation into their adulthood. Unlike so many of the guys. </p>
<p>Most of the guys who write about politics do so because this is their last chance to be the jock at the school prom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Venom</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15698</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Venom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15698</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I&#039;m No Feminist. I&#039;m Just Female.&lt;/strong&gt;
I&#039;m getting mighty tired of the ol&#039; &quot;sexism in the blogosphere&quot; debate. Isn&#039;t there news to focus on?

Look, if &quot;feminism&quot; was all about women being viewed as the equals of men, then it ultimately boils down to gender being irrel...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I'm No Feminist. I'm Just Female.</strong><br />
I'm getting mighty tired of the ol' "sexism in the blogosphere" debate. Isn't there news to focus on?</p>
<p>Look, if "feminism" was all about women being viewed as the equals of men, then it ultimately boils down to gender being irrel...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I love Jet Noise</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15699</link>
		<dc:creator>I love Jet Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15699</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;It&#039;s All About Boobs, Stupid...&lt;/strong&gt;
Damn! Now they tell me... Here I&#039;ve been cranking out articles about Kerry, the War on Terror, racial profiling, and outsourcing and it turns out that what you people really want to hear about is my breasts. Plus it wouldn&#039;t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It's All About Boobs, Stupid...</strong><br />
Damn! Now they tell me... Here I've been cranking out articles about Kerry, the War on Terror, racial profiling, and outsourcing and it turns out that what you people really want to hear about is my breasts. Plus it wouldn't</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Signifying Nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15700</link>
		<dc:creator>Signifying Nothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15700</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social construction zone&lt;/strong&gt;
Today&#8217;s Beltway Traffic Jam has a decidedly topical theme, given the gender role discussion that has swept this little corner of the &#039;sphere lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social construction zone</strong><br />
Today&#8217;s Beltway Traffic Jam has a decidedly topical theme, given the gender role discussion that has swept this little corner of the 'sphere lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Venom</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/meryls_blogiversary/comment-page-1/#comment-15701</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Venom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5885#comment-15701</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Well, I AM Stranded On An Island&lt;/strong&gt;
I&#039;ve been stewing over John Hawkins&#039;s entry If I Were Stuck On A Desert Island With Just 10 Bloggers..., but not for the reasons you think.

First, has no one caught that John&#039;s talking about a &quot;desert island&quot;? Not a deserted island. N...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Well, I AM Stranded On An Island</strong><br />
I've been stewing over John Hawkins's entry If I Were Stuck On A Desert Island With Just 10 Bloggers..., but not for the reasons you think.</p>
<p>First, has no one caught that John's talking about a "desert island"? Not a deserted island. N...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
