<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Finds New Windows Security Flaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/microsoft_finds_new_windows_security_flaws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/microsoft_finds_new_windows_security_flaws/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:13:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/microsoft_finds_new_windows_security_flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-15387</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5792#comment-15387</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that the reason there were a &quot;host&quot; of vulnerabilities (four is a &quot;host?&quot;) addressed yesterday is because Microsoft recently changed how they handle security updates, as mentioned in the Post article. Instead of issuing them as they occur, they&#039;re grouping them together for the release on the second Tuesday of every month.

If they feel a vulnerability is too severe to wait that long, they&#039;ll issue that fix immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't forget that the reason there were a "host" of vulnerabilities (four is a "host?") addressed yesterday is because Microsoft recently changed how they handle security updates, as mentioned in the Post article. Instead of issuing them as they occur, they're grouping them together for the release on the second Tuesday of every month.</p>
<p>If they feel a vulnerability is too severe to wait that long, they'll issue that fix immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigFire</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/microsoft_finds_new_windows_security_flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-15388</link>
		<dc:creator>BigFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5792#comment-15388</guid>
		<description>Yep.  Only took 2 hours to download 3MB of fixes...  People must have really hammered the update web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  Only took 2 hours to download 3MB of fixes...  People must have really hammered the update web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/microsoft_finds_new_windows_security_flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-15389</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5792#comment-15389</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But one would think that, once a piece of software has been on the market for several years, the kinks would have been ironed out.&lt;/i&gt;

Logically, it would seem that since updates designed to fix vulnerabilities are often rolled out more hastily than the original operating system, the problem may be that a lot of the recent vulnerabilities were &lt;i&gt;opened&lt;/i&gt; by past updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But one would think that, once a piece of software has been on the market for several years, the kinks would have been ironed out.</i></p>
<p>Logically, it would seem that since updates designed to fix vulnerabilities are often rolled out more hastily than the original operating system, the problem may be that a lot of the recent vulnerabilities were <i>opened</i> by past updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melvin toast</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/microsoft_finds_new_windows_security_flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-15390</link>
		<dc:creator>melvin toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5792#comment-15390</guid>
		<description>Fixing security flaws isn&#039;t their priority.  XP is the 3rd complete rewrite I think and it seems to have MORE flaws than older versions.

One of the main problems is that Windows was originally a single user system and each new version is designed to be 100% compatible with software that runs on older versions.  Apple bit the bullet to go from OS9 to OSX.  Bill isn&#039;t interested in doing that because when you have a monopoly there&#039;s really no benefit to improving quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixing security flaws isn't their priority.  XP is the 3rd complete rewrite I think and it seems to have MORE flaws than older versions.</p>
<p>One of the main problems is that Windows was originally a single user system and each new version is designed to be 100% compatible with software that runs on older versions.  Apple bit the bullet to go from OS9 to OSX.  Bill isn't interested in doing that because when you have a monopoly there's really no benefit to improving quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TM Lutas</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/microsoft_finds_new_windows_security_flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-15391</link>
		<dc:creator>TM Lutas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5792#comment-15391</guid>
		<description>The lack of stability and security is probably a major reason why about 40% of their customers are looking for a way to exit the Microsoft software ecology. Eventually they will find a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of stability and security is probably a major reason why about 40% of their customers are looking for a way to exit the Microsoft software ecology. Eventually they will find a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capt joe</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/microsoft_finds_new_windows_security_flaws/comment-page-1/#comment-15392</link>
		<dc:creator>capt joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5792#comment-15392</guid>
		<description>yeah, the bimonthly security upgrade.

That is why I run my own site on a set of clustered linux and solaris machines.



---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, the bimonthly security upgrade.</p>
<p>That is why I run my own site on a set of clustered linux and solaris machines.</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
