Comments on: Judith Miller Agrees to Testify in Plame Probe

By: Anderson

Anderson — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:22:10 +0000

The latest take seems to be that Libby's 1st waiver was just fine, and that Miller's asking for a 2d waiver was just her way of saving face --- "hey, I'm tired of prison, can I have a waiver?"

We will see.

--Anderson, the Guilt-Free Liberal

By: DL

DL — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:06:23 +0000

Anderson

I'm with you. There is a fishy smell and no mackerel barrel around, so it's coming from somewhere else. This may be part of a bigger plan and its timing is the key or something being planned has fizzled. I suspect we'll find out shortly.

Since liberals have no guilt - hence never are able to experience shame, it wasn't about saving face, that's for sure!

By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator

Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 03:35:24 +0000

Miller Agrees to Testify in CIA Leak Probe

After nearly three months behind bars, New York Times reporter Judith Miller was released Thursday a

By: Media Lies

Media Lies — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 03:21:01 +0000

James Joyner has me scratching my head....

....by reporting on the news that Judith Miller has been released from prison after getting assurances from Scooter Libby that she was released from any obligation of confide...

By: Anderson

Anderson — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 03:19:51 +0000

Okay, y'all, but why would it take this long?

And having waited this long, why now? why ever?

I'm puzzled why Miller, whose lack of regard for the truth is on record, wouldn't just perjure herself anyway. Maybe she & others are scared that Fitzgerald knows enough to catch them at it.

By: TnTexas

TnTexas — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:48:00 +0000

Libby had already issued a generalized statement allowing any reporters who had spoken with him to reveal that fact as well as the contents of the discussions if they wished. Apparently, Miller wanted a personalized waiver, not a general one. The Meeting (top of story's second page)

By: McGehee

McGehee — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:38:07 +0000

Wait a minute, didn't we hear months ago that she already had been released from her pledge -- but refused to testify because she thought her source had been coerced into the release? So now she decides this time he means it, and it's his fault she was in jail for three months?

By: The Moderate Voice

The Moderate Voice — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:31:13 +0000

Judith Miller Freed And Will Testify

It's now official crunchy time with the news that jailed New York Times reporter Judith Miller has been freed and will testify in the Valery Plame ...

By: Henry Schlatman

Henry Schlatman — Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:21:46 +0000

I'm glad to finally see that Libby has the guts to come forward and release her from her obligation of confidentiality; however, doesn't this just add flames to the fire that the Republican party is having?