<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movies Getting Longer (But Just Barely)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/movies_getting_longer_but_just_barely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/movies_getting_longer_but_just_barely/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:28:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spoker</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/movies_getting_longer_but_just_barely/comment-page-1/#comment-416288</link>
		<dc:creator>Spoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/movies_getting_longer_but_just_barely/#comment-416288</guid>
		<description>Why is this a surprise?  It takes longer for todays movies to lecture than it did for movies in the past to entertain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this a surprise?  It takes longer for todays movies to lecture than it did for movies in the past to entertain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/movies_getting_longer_but_just_barely/comment-page-1/#comment-416108</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/movies_getting_longer_but_just_barely/#comment-416108</guid>
		<description>Self-important and self-indulgent directors.  I won&#039;t dispute that there are occasional stories that support a treatment at length.  More common are a half hour of story expanded to fill a two-hour slot (with commercials during replay on television).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-important and self-indulgent directors.  I won't dispute that there are occasional stories that support a treatment at length.  More common are a half hour of story expanded to fill a two-hour slot (with commercials during replay on television).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/movies_getting_longer_but_just_barely/comment-page-1/#comment-416104</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/movies_getting_longer_but_just_barely/#comment-416104</guid>
		<description>One&#039;s perception of what is &#039;endless&#039; is perhaps tempered by the material on the film itself. I don&#039;t recall many people complaining about the overall length of Lord of the Rings, for example,which in it&#039;s full version ran 250 minutes, give or take. 

The reader&#039;s imagination is invoked here as to why a movie about women and their sexual relationships with men would seem overly long to Sullivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One's perception of what is 'endless' is perhaps tempered by the material on the film itself. I don't recall many people complaining about the overall length of Lord of the Rings, for example,which in it's full version ran 250 minutes, give or take. </p>
<p>The reader's imagination is invoked here as to why a movie about women and their sexual relationships with men would seem overly long to Sullivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
