<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MURDER AND ABORTION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murder_and_abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murder_and_abortion/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:19:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Professor Kaos</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murder_and_abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Kaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1264#comment-273</guid>
		<description>This is a classic example of the left proving what hypocrites they are.  NOW is allegedly an organization promoting the rights of women and children, yet they have basically given Scott Peterson a free pass on murdering his son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a classic example of the left proving what hypocrites they are.  NOW is allegedly an organization promoting the rights of women and children, yet they have basically given Scott Peterson a free pass on murdering his son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murder_and_abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1264#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Yep.  But if they admit that it&#039;s murder, than how can they be for &quot;choice&quot; when it&#039;s the mother doing it.  So, they have to pretend that he just murdered his wife--again, assuming he did (I really haven&#039;t followed the case)--and that he &lt;i&gt;had&lt;/i&gt; no son, just an prospective one that didn&#039;t make it to term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep.  But if they admit that it's murder, than how can they be for "choice" when it's the mother doing it.  So, they have to pretend that he just murdered his wife--again, assuming he did (I really haven't followed the case)--and that he <i>had</i> no son, just an prospective one that didn't make it to term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murder_and_abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1264#comment-275</guid>
		<description>Clearly you have been avoiding Fox News, as it has seemingly become the Peterson Channel.  

It does appear rather likely, I must say, that the man is guilty.  I initially (back in December) thought that the speculation about him was unfair given the situation.  However,there does appear to be a great deal of circumstantial evidence that makes we think that the probability is quite high the police have the right guy.

And in regards to NOW, they are being intellectually consistent, although I find their position rather repugnant (to say the least).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly you have been avoiding Fox News, as it has seemingly become the Peterson Channel.  </p>
<p>It does appear rather likely, I must say, that the man is guilty.  I initially (back in December) thought that the speculation about him was unfair given the situation.  However,there does appear to be a great deal of circumstantial evidence that makes we think that the probability is quite high the police have the right guy.</p>
<p>And in regards to NOW, they are being intellectually consistent, although I find their position rather repugnant (to say the least).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murder_and_abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1264#comment-276</guid>
		<description>By and large, I avoid these &quot;human interest&quot; stories on murdered children and the like.  I didn&#039;t even follow the Ramsey case.  And, fortunately, the &quot;All-Stars&quot; haven&#039;t talked about this one very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By and large, I avoid these "human interest" stories on murdered children and the like.  I didn't even follow the Ramsey case.  And, fortunately, the "All-Stars" haven't talked about this one very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confessions of a G33k</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murder_and_abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Confessions of a G33k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1264#comment-277</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NOW and how fetuses should be treated legally&lt;/strong&gt;
I saw this story on Drudge too, but I wasn&#039;t sure if I was going to blog about it until...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NOW and how fetuses should be treated legally</strong><br />
I saw this story on Drudge too, but I wasn't sure if I was going to blog about it until...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arguing with signposts...</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murder_and_abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Arguing with signposts...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1264#comment-278</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Peterson and Roe v. Wade&lt;/strong&gt;
I suppose someone was bound to bring this up: Laci Peterson case tied to Roe debate The head of the National Organization for Women&#039;s Morris County chapter is opposing a double-murder charge in the Laci Peterson case, saying it could...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Peterson and Roe v. Wade</strong><br />
I suppose someone was bound to bring this up: Laci Peterson case tied to Roe debate The head of the National Organization for Women's Morris County chapter is opposing a double-murder charge in the Laci Peterson case, saying it could...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
