<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdock: Nations Will Be Redefined</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murdock_nations_will_be_redefined/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murdock_nations_will_be_redefined/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:42:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick DeMent</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murdock_nations_will_be_redefined/comment-page-1/#comment-983107</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick DeMent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32075#comment-983107</guid>
		<description>Nations have already been redefined, instead of the USA, the UK and PRC we have Wal-Mart, Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and ING. (if you look at the top ten list 5 of them are energy companies ...).

What is amazing is that you have people like Verdon pissed off to no end because they are all taxed too much. Man they have him snowed but good :)

Interesting times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nations have already been redefined, instead of the USA, the UK and PRC we have Wal-Mart, Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and ING. (if you look at the top ten list 5 of them are energy companies ...).</p>
<p>What is amazing is that you have people like Verdon pissed off to no end because they are all taxed too much. Man they have him snowed but good :)</p>
<p>Interesting times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murdock_nations_will_be_redefined/comment-page-1/#comment-983084</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32075#comment-983084</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The whole idea of the erosion of the nation-state was a central part of the po-mo turn in IR theory during the 90s.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not sure what&#039;s postmodern about it.  It&#039;s irrefutable that multinational corporations, terrorist groups, IGOs, NGOs, and others operate under something other than the complete sovereignty of state actors.  

As I understood the pomo debate in IR, it was the argument that one could never objectively study IR because there was no non-objective view and no lasting measurement that applies across time and space.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=LCouWdxQGkQC&amp;pg=PA279&amp;source=gbs_selected_pages&amp;cad=0_1#PPA294,M1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The whole idea of the erosion of the nation-state was a central part of the po-mo turn in IR theory during the 90s.</p></blockquote>
<p>I'm not sure what's postmodern about it.  It's irrefutable that multinational corporations, terrorist groups, IGOs, NGOs, and others operate under something other than the complete sovereignty of state actors.  </p>
<p>As I understood the pomo debate in IR, it was the argument that one could never objectively study IR because there was no non-objective view and no lasting measurement that applies across time and space.  See <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=LCouWdxQGkQC&#038;pg=PA279&#038;source=gbs_selected_pages&#038;cad=0_1#PPA294,M1" rel="nofollow">here</a>, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murdock_nations_will_be_redefined/comment-page-1/#comment-983077</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32075#comment-983077</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“MURDOCH WARNS NATIONS WILL BE REDEFINED”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is news? Think of the changes in &quot;nations&quot; that have happened in your lifetime</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“MURDOCH WARNS NATIONS WILL BE REDEFINED”</p></blockquote>
<p>This is news? Think of the changes in "nations" that have happened in your lifetime</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/murdock_nations_will_be_redefined/comment-page-1/#comment-983066</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=32075#comment-983066</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But he could be the archetype of a more globalized citizenry, at least at the upper levels.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dude, this is postmodern as well!  The whole idea of the erosion of the nation-state was a central part of the po-mo turn in IR theory during the 90s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But he could be the archetype of a more globalized citizenry, at least at the upper levels.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude, this is postmodern as well!  The whole idea of the erosion of the nation-state was a central part of the po-mo turn in IR theory during the 90s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
