with what the Dmeocrats have been doing?

Guess the number of republicans who are mixed up in the Murtha business eluded you. Now there is a shocker...

Steele, meanwhile had arranged for his 2006 Senate campaign to pay a defunct company run by his sister for services that were never performed, his finance chairman from that campaign has told federal prosecutors. The payment was a payment in advance for catering(the business involved was a catering firm) and the business went belly before the party occurred. I don't even see any evidence taht the check was ever cashed/deposited.

Stuff happens, Anjin. You're really putting this on par with what the Dmeocrats have been doing? You're more desperate than I figured.

given the number of democrats under the ethics and criminal clouds currently

Noteworthy that Palin's cheating on taxes or the Michael Steele scandal outrage you not at all.

Party before country, eh bitsy?

Really Bit, you make it too easy. I am forced to ask you, Did the Republicans ignore said pressure for the previous 12 yrs? Or did they just not get any pressure from their (presumably conservative) constituents?

and specifically, what pressure is that? What pressure was there, prior to 2006's midterms for that to occur?

given the number of democrats under the ethics and criminal clouds currently, I'd advise sparing us the mantra of how the democrats are acting in the best interests of anyone but themselves in this.

This obviously would be illegal for PMA Group to do, but what isn't know yet, is whether any of the targets of PMA Group knew this was going on.

Neo, I suspect they didn't care enuf to look.

That said, you don't really think the Democrats would have done this without serios pressure, now do you?

Really Bit, you make it too easy. I am forced to ask you, Did the Republicans ignore said pressure for the previous 12 yrs? Or did they just not get any pressure from their (presumably conservative) constituents?

Either way you go, Republicans are either so corrupt they won't bend to pressure, or their constituents are so corrupt (or ignorant) they don't care. Which is it?

Tell you what, I'll give you an out, Credit where credit is due:

And earmark accountability rules imposed by the Democrats in 2007 make it possible to see how extensively PMA worked the Hill for its clients.

You can say it Bit... the Dems did a good thing (under pressure if you like), but they did it, you can say it,... but you won't.

Marvin Hoffman is listed in campaign finance records as one of the many lobbyists with the powerful PMA Group donating money to lawmakers. But Hoffman is a soon-to-retire information technology manager in Marina del Rey, Calif., who has never heard of the Arlington lobbying firm or the Indiana congressman to whom he supposedly gave $2,000.

"It's alarming that someone is stealing my identity somewhere," Hoffman, 75, said in an interview. "I've never heard of this company."

This obviously would be illegal for PMA Group to do, but what isn't know yet, is whether any of the targets of PMA Group knew this was going on.

No you'll excuse me I have to fall down laughing.

Did you miss this change bit Bit?

Nope.
That said, you don't really think the Democrats would have done this without serios pressure, now do you?

Damn bit, you have us dead to rights. Obama's inability to go back in time and change things that happened before he was President proves him to be a fraud.

Oh, come. Look, anjin....We were told that the Dmeocrats would be the agents of positive change. Given the number of Democrats now under investigation for misdeeds in execution of power and the illegal efforts to obtain it (campaign funding scandals), it appears we've elected the foxes to bring serious change to the chicken coup.

Change we can believe in.

Damn bit, you have us dead to rights. Obama's inability to go back in time and change things that happened before he was President proves him to be a fraud.

While we are on this sort ofthing, will we ever be discussion Palin's tax problems or the Michael Steele scandal?