<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Musharraf vs. Chavez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-219747</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/musharraf_vs_chavez/#comment-219747</guid>
		<description>&quot;Part of the reason for this emergency declaration is to rid the country of Al Qaeda and Taliban &quot;

That is just not true Steve. That is the line he gives out to mollify critics in the West. The reason for the emergency was simple - he was in danger of losing power. He is a dictator, remember?

The situation in Pakistan is NOT one where it is Musharraf or the Islamists. Support for Bhutto and for Sharif is huge relative to the support for any kind of extremist. If Musharraf had lost power, it would have passed most likely to Bhutto - a western-friendly regime - with secular militarists (not unlike Musharraf) holding substantial power in the background.

This has nothing to do with the terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Part of the reason for this emergency declaration is to rid the country of Al Qaeda and Taliban "</p>
<p>That is just not true Steve. That is the line he gives out to mollify critics in the West. The reason for the emergency was simple - he was in danger of losing power. He is a dictator, remember?</p>
<p>The situation in Pakistan is NOT one where it is Musharraf or the Islamists. Support for Bhutto and for Sharif is huge relative to the support for any kind of extremist. If Musharraf had lost power, it would have passed most likely to Bhutto - a western-friendly regime - with secular militarists (not unlike Musharraf) holding substantial power in the background.</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with the terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Plunk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-218996</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Plunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/musharraf_vs_chavez/#comment-218996</guid>
		<description>Jeesh, can&#039;t anyone ask a question?  Reynolds has something of a point.  JJ was the only person to actual make a reasonable response.  Just calling someone&#039;s question dumb is not a response.

The nuclear argument is well taken but wouldn&#039;t we rather see Musharref maintain control over those weapons even if it means a reduction of civil liberties?  The country is a mess by anyone&#039;s standards and stability should be first and foremost.  The question I haven&#039;t heard asked or answered is where is Bhutto and what is her reaction?

Part of the reason for this emergency declaration is to rid the country of Al Qaeda and Taliban so I don&#039;t agree with Maguire&#039;s point of view.

Musharref said earlier he would not let his country commit suicide.  That suicide would be the installation of an Islamic regime bent on giving those weapons to terrorists.

Before anyone calls my post &quot;dumb&quot; take some time to make a real argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeesh, can't anyone ask a question?  Reynolds has something of a point.  JJ was the only person to actual make a reasonable response.  Just calling someone's question dumb is not a response.</p>
<p>The nuclear argument is well taken but wouldn't we rather see Musharref maintain control over those weapons even if it means a reduction of civil liberties?  The country is a mess by anyone's standards and stability should be first and foremost.  The question I haven't heard asked or answered is where is Bhutto and what is her reaction?</p>
<p>Part of the reason for this emergency declaration is to rid the country of Al Qaeda and Taliban so I don't agree with Maguire's point of view.</p>
<p>Musharref said earlier he would not let his country commit suicide.  That suicide would be the installation of an Islamic regime bent on giving those weapons to terrorists.</p>
<p>Before anyone calls my post "dumb" take some time to make a real argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bandit</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-218950</link>
		<dc:creator>Bandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/musharraf_vs_chavez/#comment-218950</guid>
		<description>One place lefty tyrants can always count on support, no matter how many die in their totalitarian gulags, is with the US left because they just go for that kinda stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One place lefty tyrants can always count on support, no matter how many die in their totalitarian gulags, is with the US left because they just go for that kinda stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-218736</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/musharraf_vs_chavez/#comment-218736</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;More evidence that Glenn Reynolds lives in an imaginary world of his own creation. Really, that could be the dumbest thing I&#039;ve ever read by him, by far.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More evidence that Glenn Reynolds lives in an imaginary world of his own creation. Really, that could be the dumbest thing I've ever read by him, by far.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-218709</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/musharraf_vs_chavez/#comment-218709</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why does the Liberal Media pay attention to [apples] while ignoring [oranges]?&quot; is one of the five or so standard Instapundit templates, IIRC from back when I bothered to read him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Why does the Liberal Media pay attention to [apples] while ignoring [oranges]?" is one of the five or so standard Instapundit templates, IIRC from back when I bothered to read him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugh</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-218678</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/musharraf_vs_chavez/#comment-218678</guid>
		<description>More evidence that Glenn Reynolds lives in an imaginary world of his own creation.  Really, that could be the dumbest thing I&#039;ve ever read by him, by far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More evidence that Glenn Reynolds lives in an imaginary world of his own creation.  Really, that could be the dumbest thing I've ever read by him, by far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-218634</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/musharraf_vs_chavez/#comment-218634</guid>
		<description>Wow, dumb question from Reynolds.  On the topic of Venezuela, though, there was a great article in the NYTimes Magazine yesterday re: state oil enterprises &amp; efficiency.  Strongly recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, dumb question from Reynolds.  On the topic of Venezuela, though, there was a great article in the NYTimes Magazine yesterday re: state oil enterprises &amp; efficiency.  Strongly recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1EK</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/musharraf_vs_chavez/comment-page-1/#comment-218629</link>
		<dc:creator>M1EK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/11/musharraf_vs_chavez/#comment-218629</guid>
		<description>A more important question is why Glenn Reynolds thinks his question is one worth asking. That&#039;s dumb even for a partisan hack like him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A more important question is why Glenn Reynolds thinks his question is one worth asking. That's dumb even for a partisan hack like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
