Comments on: National Enquirer More Believable than New York Times http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/ Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: McGehee http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/comment-page-1/#comment-18484 McGehee Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=6422#comment-18484 The <i>National Enquirer</i>? You mean <a href="http://www.mcgeheezone.com/blogoSFERICS/index.php/weblog/comments/143/">this</a> <i>National Enquirer</i>? Of course it's more trustworthy than the <i>New York Times</i> -- so is <i>Weekly World News</i>, because <i>WWN</i> makes no bones about making it all up. The National Enquirer? You mean this National Enquirer?

Of course it's more trustworthy than the New York Times -- so is Weekly World News, because WWN makes no bones about making it all up.

]]> By: bryan http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/comment-page-1/#comment-18485 bryan Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=6422#comment-18485 I doubt you could get that many people to <i>admit</i> they read the National Enquirer, much less say how much of it they believed. If you were to do an actual content survey, where people read an issue of the NE and then rated the believability of the items in the paper, I think the numbers would be very different. I doubt you could get that many people to admit they read the National Enquirer, much less say how much of it they believed.

If you were to do an actual content survey, where people read an issue of the NE and then rated the believability of the items in the paper, I think the numbers would be very different.

]]> By: Christopher Cross http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/comment-page-1/#comment-18486 Christopher Cross Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=6422#comment-18486 No link? No link?

]]> By: inside the buttway http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/comment-page-1/#comment-18487 inside the buttway Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=6422#comment-18487 your web site takes ten min. to upload, no wonder you still have less than 1 million hits. why invest so much time and still be so cheap as not to get a pro to set you up right. your web site takes ten min. to upload, no wonder you still have less than 1 million hits.

why invest so much time and still be so cheap as not to get a pro to set you up right.

]]> By: Boyd http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/comment-page-1/#comment-18488 Boyd Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=6422#comment-18488 At the risk of feeding a troll, I have to state that James's site takes about five seconds to load on my computer (not optimal, to be sure, but not totally unreasonable, either). If it takes ITB 10 minutes to load the page, methinks he should spend more time investigating his own problems instead of besmirching other sites. At the risk of feeding a troll, I have to state that James's site takes about five seconds to load on my computer (not optimal, to be sure, but not totally unreasonable, either).

If it takes ITB 10 minutes to load the page, methinks he should spend more time investigating his own problems instead of besmirching other sites.

]]> By: McGehee http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/comment-page-1/#comment-18489 McGehee Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=6422#comment-18489 I didn't know there were still Internet-by-carrier-pigeon connections available. Maybe at the Unabomber's old cabin... I didn't know there were still Internet-by-carrier-pigeon connections available. Maybe at the Unabomber's old cabin...

]]> By: bryan http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/comment-page-1/#comment-18490 bryan Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=6422#comment-18490 Actually, I still have dial-up at home, and James' site takes an incredibly long time to load. I think it has to do with the blogrolls, and blog ads, but I could be wrong. The two sites that load quickest for me on dialup - dean's world and a small victory - hang up on the blogrolls and blogads. Perhaps, James, you could move some of the code around to where it loads the center column first, it might make a differene. Actually, I still have dial-up at home, and James' site takes an incredibly long time to load. I think it has to do with the blogrolls, and blog ads, but I could be wrong.

The two sites that load quickest for me on dialup - dean's world and a small victory - hang up on the blogrolls and blogads. Perhaps, James, you could move some of the code around to where it loads the center column first, it might make a differene.

]]> By: Read My Lips http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/national_enquirer_more_believable_than_new_york_times/comment-page-1/#comment-18491 Read My Lips Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 /?p=6422#comment-18491 <strong>Who is bloggin' on Saturday?</strong> Susie said somethin' 'bout her pipes bein' rusty, but no need for us to worry.Gennie said she has some work to do locatin' one hit wonders.Annika reviewed yesterday's memorial service for the late and great President, Ronald Reagan.Stevie pondered the... --- Who is bloggin' on Saturday?
Susie said somethin' 'bout her pipes bein' rusty, but no need for us to worry.Gennie said she has some work to do locatin' one hit wonders.Annika reviewed yesterday's memorial service for the late and great President, Ronald Reagan.Stevie pondered the...

---

]]>