<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navy Approves New Uniforms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:28:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DARRELL</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-76077</link>
		<dc:creator>DARRELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-76077</guid>
		<description>Speaking for all snipes everywhere. Who cares what it looks like. How hot is that sucker when you are in a steaming engine room. Those dorky bluejeans may have looked funny but the chambray shirts weren&#039;t too bad. These bdu&#039;s look like heat stroke suits. However to be fair, I didn&#039;t like poopysuits either. Polyester was never my style. 

Finally for all those knocking crackerjacks They worked really well in liberty ports as poggie bait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking for all snipes everywhere. Who cares what it looks like. How hot is that sucker when you are in a steaming engine room. Those dorky bluejeans may have looked funny but the chambray shirts weren't too bad. These bdu's look like heat stroke suits. However to be fair, I didn't like poopysuits either. Polyester was never my style. </p>
<p>Finally for all those knocking crackerjacks They worked really well in liberty ports as poggie bait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidney Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75928</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidney Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75928</guid>
		<description>This is about the worst decision that I have seen with uniforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is about the worst decision that I have seen with uniforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yhoi</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75647</link>
		<dc:creator>Yhoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75647</guid>
		<description>If they are trying to make the new uniform look less gay, they have failed miserably.  There is a reason the Village People were so into the Navy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are trying to make the new uniform look less gay, they have failed miserably.  There is a reason the Village People were so into the Navy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75628</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75628</guid>
		<description>AAFES - Army and Air Force
NEX - Navy
MCX - Marines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AAFES - Army and Air Force<br />
NEX - Navy<br />
MCX - Marines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgtfluffy</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75623</link>
		<dc:creator>sgtfluffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75623</guid>
		<description>Man, why couldn&#039;t they have that Uniform when I was in.  I got tired of looking like a convict from the 70&#039;s :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, why couldn't they have that Uniform when I was in.  I got tired of looking like a convict from the 70's :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LJD</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75620</link>
		<dc:creator>LJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75620</guid>
		<description>I am laughing so hard right now...

Target?  Wal Mart?  WTF?  I thought lefties hated Wal-Mart?  Of course, I can hand it to you on Target- they don&#039;t like Marines or Toys for Tots on &#039;their&#039; property (how French!).

Ken, there is no Target or WalMart on a military base.  There is AAFES.  This is where uniforms are purchased at reasonable prices, partially with the uniform allowance provided for them. Can you imagine thousands of sailors getting &#039;shore leave&#039; in the middle east, to go buy their uniforms at Target and Wal-Mart? LOL

I would be very interested to hear more about your ideas though.  Like New Kids on the Block T-shirts, acid washed baggy jeans, rhinestones?  

C&#039;mon, it&#039;s Monday, I need a laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am laughing so hard right now...</p>
<p>Target?  Wal Mart?  WTF?  I thought lefties hated Wal-Mart?  Of course, I can hand it to you on Target- they don't like Marines or Toys for Tots on 'their' property (how French!).</p>
<p>Ken, there is no Target or WalMart on a military base.  There is AAFES.  This is where uniforms are purchased at reasonable prices, partially with the uniform allowance provided for them. Can you imagine thousands of sailors getting 'shore leave' in the middle east, to go buy their uniforms at Target and Wal-Mart? LOL</p>
<p>I would be very interested to hear more about your ideas though.  Like New Kids on the Block T-shirts, acid washed baggy jeans, rhinestones?  </p>
<p>C'mon, it's Monday, I need a laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevely</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75591</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75591</guid>
		<description>&quot;I understand the military and military traditions as well as anyone. &quot; - ken

Ever wear a uniform yourself ken?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I understand the military and military traditions as well as anyone. " - ken</p>
<p>Ever wear a uniform yourself ken?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fizzix</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75586</link>
		<dc:creator>fizzix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75586</guid>
		<description>I can appreciate the transition from solid blue to a mottled material.  Sailors spend a lot of time painting onboard ship but they&#039;re expected to wear spot-free uniforms.  So, dungarees often didn&#039;t last long.

I still miss the robin egg blue cotton uniforms the women wore during the 70&#039;s.  The uniforms were very high maintenance but the women always looked good in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can appreciate the transition from solid blue to a mottled material.  Sailors spend a lot of time painting onboard ship but they're expected to wear spot-free uniforms.  So, dungarees often didn't last long.</p>
<p>I still miss the robin egg blue cotton uniforms the women wore during the 70's.  The uniforms were very high maintenance but the women always looked good in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC Loser</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75578</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75578</guid>
		<description>The USAF bus drive uniform has its advantages.  I have been given employee discounts at airport restaurants by wearing that uniform on TDY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USAF bus drive uniform has its advantages.  I have been given employee discounts at airport restaurants by wearing that uniform on TDY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75565</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75565</guid>
		<description>As a Navy Veteran/Retiree, I am a bit familiar with the Navy uniforms, and how the current MCPON (senior enlisted) is changing much These changes are on the everyday working uniforms, not the dress uniforms. 

James was right to pick up on the discussion of &quot;khaki&quot; in the Navy. It is part of the culture. And speaking of culture, I seriously think Ken has zero idea what that means. Being in the military is not just another job. The uniform is more than the uniform of the Greyhound bus driver (sorry, had to get in a jab at the USAF). I imagine you would also get rid of close-order drill, and the theatrics at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. And for Ken - tell your comments to the sailors on the USS Stark. In particular, look at the report&#039;s comments on on those wearing gym shorts as underwear, which melted during the firefighting response. Little things can end up making a big difference. Not just Walmart. And I imagine you have never been in a uniform shop, where the working uniforms are at a comparable price to what you find at Walmart. {Dress Uniform prices are a different matter].

Navy Dungarees have been horrible since 1950. Blue jeans gone bad, with useless pockets. Recently they went to something similar to the Submarine Force &quot;poopy-suit&quot; coverall. But while this uniform may be OK underway, it really is just a coverall, not appropriate for wearing out in town. So now the Navy is following the other services in adopting a dungarees-style uniform - not reinventing the wheel here. The Navy needs a replacement. 

But there is a more significant military-civilian relationship story here, the hiding of the military in the 70s and 80s. Going back in time a decade, the Navy&#039;s working uniforms were not permitted off-base. So the industrially working members of the military had to commute to work in their civilian clothes, and then change once they got onto the base, because all hell would break out if sailors were seen in their regular apparel. God forbid we should see a sailor at work. 

Back to today on the dress uniforms, the crackerjacks (service dress white and blue will continue). It is part of the Navy tradition, and not only the US Navy. While I would like to see the Choker-White disappear, the Top Gun Uniform, disappear, it is traditional, and will remain. No one really cares about the working uniforms, but there is pride in the dress uniforms. 

(Minor point - James is editor of the Navy PG School&#039;s publication - figured it would be good to point that out in disclosure, given the BS about disclosure lately.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Navy Veteran/Retiree, I am a bit familiar with the Navy uniforms, and how the current MCPON (senior enlisted) is changing much These changes are on the everyday working uniforms, not the dress uniforms. </p>
<p>James was right to pick up on the discussion of "khaki" in the Navy. It is part of the culture. And speaking of culture, I seriously think Ken has zero idea what that means. Being in the military is not just another job. The uniform is more than the uniform of the Greyhound bus driver (sorry, had to get in a jab at the USAF). I imagine you would also get rid of close-order drill, and the theatrics at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. And for Ken - tell your comments to the sailors on the USS Stark. In particular, look at the report's comments on on those wearing gym shorts as underwear, which melted during the firefighting response. Little things can end up making a big difference. Not just Walmart. And I imagine you have never been in a uniform shop, where the working uniforms are at a comparable price to what you find at Walmart. {Dress Uniform prices are a different matter].</p>
<p>Navy Dungarees have been horrible since 1950. Blue jeans gone bad, with useless pockets. Recently they went to something similar to the Submarine Force "poopy-suit" coverall. But while this uniform may be OK underway, it really is just a coverall, not appropriate for wearing out in town. So now the Navy is following the other services in adopting a dungarees-style uniform - not reinventing the wheel here. The Navy needs a replacement. </p>
<p>But there is a more significant military-civilian relationship story here, the hiding of the military in the 70s and 80s. Going back in time a decade, the Navy's working uniforms were not permitted off-base. So the industrially working members of the military had to commute to work in their civilian clothes, and then change once they got onto the base, because all hell would break out if sailors were seen in their regular apparel. God forbid we should see a sailor at work. </p>
<p>Back to today on the dress uniforms, the crackerjacks (service dress white and blue will continue). It is part of the Navy tradition, and not only the US Navy. While I would like to see the Choker-White disappear, the Top Gun Uniform, disappear, it is traditional, and will remain. No one really cares about the working uniforms, but there is pride in the dress uniforms. </p>
<p>(Minor point - James is editor of the Navy PG School's publication - figured it would be good to point that out in disclosure, given the BS about disclosure lately.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G A Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75563</link>
		<dc:creator>G A Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 04:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75563</guid>
		<description>Ken I was just messing&#039;,and the navy could make the uni&#039;s look a loot tougher if there going to change them seeing we are in a global holy war and all. you no like the other dimension next generation star trek uni&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken I was just messing',and the navy could make the uni's look a loot tougher if there going to change them seeing we are in a global holy war and all. you no like the other dimension next generation star trek uni's.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75558</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 01:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75558</guid>
		<description>G.A. Philips, what Michael Jackson has done shows just how the traditional Navy uniform is so dorky. If you had any respect for the people who had to actually wear this stuff you would have more appreciation for the navy&#039;s decision to change it. 

I don&#039;t think the people in the service however are going to appreciate just going from one silly  look to another silly look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G.A. Philips, what Michael Jackson has done shows just how the traditional Navy uniform is so dorky. If you had any respect for the people who had to actually wear this stuff you would have more appreciation for the navy's decision to change it. </p>
<p>I don't think the people in the service however are going to appreciate just going from one silly  look to another silly look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G A Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75556</link>
		<dc:creator>G A Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75556</guid>
		<description>Herb, Dude, he wants ever body to dress like Michael Jackson, Ken must be even farther left than I thought he was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herb, Dude, he wants ever body to dress like Michael Jackson, Ken must be even farther left than I thought he was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75554</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75554</guid>
		<description>djnylon, I would bet that, if given a chance to wear either the traditional uniform or something more contemporary, but equally formal, that many if not most sailors would choose the new and improved model. Over time the traditional uniform would be as rarely seen as the Beefeaters hat in London. 

I don&#039;t see this happening but since the navy is changing the uniforms anyway why not consider the possibility of either eliminating them altogether or replacing them with something more in line with contemporary American standards and values?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>djnylon, I would bet that, if given a chance to wear either the traditional uniform or something more contemporary, but equally formal, that many if not most sailors would choose the new and improved model. Over time the traditional uniform would be as rarely seen as the Beefeaters hat in London. </p>
<p>I don't see this happening but since the navy is changing the uniforms anyway why not consider the possibility of either eliminating them altogether or replacing them with something more in line with contemporary American standards and values?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/navy_approves_new_uniforms_/comment-page-1/#comment-75552</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 23:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13900#comment-75552</guid>
		<description>If Ken &quot;knows all about the military and military rtaditions&quot;, he must have read about it in his favorite liberal anti American training handbook. 

Thats about the closest he ever came to anything military. He NEVER severved a minute in the service of his country choosing only to be a leach and take, take, take at every Americans expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ken "knows all about the military and military rtaditions", he must have read about it in his favorite liberal anti American training handbook. </p>
<p>Thats about the closest he ever came to anything military. He NEVER severved a minute in the service of his country choosing only to be a leach and take, take, take at every Americans expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
