<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEW HAMPSHIRE BLOGGING (ONGOING)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:35:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11465</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11465</guid>
		<description>Re: 2034 - is it just me or does Ed Gillespie look like a ostrich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: 2034 - is it just me or does Ed Gillespie look like a ostrich?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Prather</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11466</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Prather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11466</guid>
		<description>I have to admit bias here.  I can&#039;t stand Clark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit bias here.  I can't stand Clark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Prather</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11467</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Prather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11467</guid>
		<description>That Robert Kaiser is a brave prognosticator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Robert Kaiser is a brave prognosticator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11468</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11468</guid>
		<description>Heh.

And, yeah, I started off neutral on Clark but haven&#039;t seen much to like. Kerry or Edwards are both plausible presidential candidates; Clark and Dean, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.</p>
<p>And, yeah, I started off neutral on Clark but haven't seen much to like. Kerry or Edwards are both plausible presidential candidates; Clark and Dean, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11469</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11469</guid>
		<description>Why is that Clark gets 13% and he&#039;s told to wrap it up and go home yet Edwards gets 13% and he&#039;s considered &quot;viable?&quot; 

(I despise Clark as much as anyone but it still strikes me as odd that he is held to a different standard.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is that Clark gets 13% and he's told to wrap it up and go home yet Edwards gets 13% and he's considered "viable?" </p>
<p>(I despise Clark as much as anyone but it still strikes me as odd that he is held to a different standard.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11470</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11470</guid>
		<description>Joe,

I think the projections are that Edwards will eek out 3rd place.  Plus, Edwards came in second in Iowa whereas Clark skipped it to concentrate all his efforts in New Hampshire--and still didn&#039;t do as well as Edwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>I think the projections are that Edwards will eek out 3rd place.  Plus, Edwards came in second in Iowa whereas Clark skipped it to concentrate all his efforts in New Hampshire--and still didn't do as well as Edwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11471</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11471</guid>
		<description>NH had been the SC vote more of a shot on the dark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NH had been the SC vote more of a shot on the dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11472</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11472</guid>
		<description>It seems I can&#039;t think and type at the same time.

NH has made the SC vote more of a shot in the dark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems I can't think and type at the same time.</p>
<p>NH has made the SC vote more of a shot in the dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11473</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11473</guid>
		<description>RE Your 2039 post with Howard Dean as a Head Wound.  Is there a SNL character in the works called &quot;Massive Headwound Howard?&quot;

Heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE Your 2039 post with Howard Dean as a Head Wound.  Is there a SNL character in the works called "Massive Headwound Howard?"</p>
<p>Heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11474</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11474</guid>
		<description>Mark, 

I don&#039;t know, but there should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>I don't know, but there should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hasty</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11475</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hasty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11475</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bring it on&quot; is the Newsweek cover blurb this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Bring it on" is the Newsweek cover blurb this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11476</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11476</guid>
		<description>Joe

Also Clark has taken a nose dive in the polls. Losing something like 15 points in a week is never good.

Edwards was in Iowa then went almost directly to SC. He did not work near as hard in NH as Clark but finished about the same maybe better.

PLUS never forget the most important thing of all. Edwards is sane, Clark ain&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe</p>
<p>Also Clark has taken a nose dive in the polls. Losing something like 15 points in a week is never good.</p>
<p>Edwards was in Iowa then went almost directly to SC. He did not work near as hard in NH as Clark but finished about the same maybe better.</p>
<p>PLUS never forget the most important thing of all. Edwards is sane, Clark ain't.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priorities & Frivolities</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11477</link>
		<dc:creator>Priorities & Frivolities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11477</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Live New Hampshire Primary Election Analysis&lt;/strong&gt;
I&#039;m watching MSNBC -- partially, I admit, for superficial reasons. Anyhow, I find it strange that David Schuster&#039;s polling booth report appears via videophone instead of standard television feed. Why? Doesn&#039;t the network have the wherewithal to send a ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Live New Hampshire Primary Election Analysis</strong><br />
I'm watching MSNBC -- partially, I admit, for superficial reasons. Anyhow, I find it strange that David Schuster's polling booth report appears via videophone instead of standard television feed. Why? Doesn't the network have the wherewithal to send a ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11478</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11478</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NH Analysis will be Ongoing&lt;/strong&gt;
Rather than the mega-post style employed by James Joyner over at OTB, I will stick to the rapid-fire post version of coverage....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NH Analysis will be Ongoing</strong><br />
Rather than the mega-post style employed by James Joyner over at OTB, I will stick to the rapid-fire post version of coverage....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bejus Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_hampshire_blogging_ongoing/comment-page-1/#comment-11479</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bejus Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4820#comment-11479</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pay attention&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner has spoken: &quot;Fred Barnes made the interesting point on Fox Special Report earlier that this race now reminds him of the 1976 Republican contest between President Gerald Ford and then-California Governor Ronald Reagan. Ford won Iowa, New Ha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pay attention</strong><br />
James Joyner has spoken: "Fred Barnes made the interesting point on Fox Special Report earlier that this race now reminds him of the 1976 Republican contest between President Gerald Ford and then-California Governor Ronald Reagan. Ford won Iowa, New Ha...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
