<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Tool to Fight Comment Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:07:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: damnum absque injuria</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-32502</link>
		<dc:creator>damnum absque injuria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8879#comment-32502</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Attention Comment Spammers&lt;/strong&gt;
You can still spam this site if you want, but it won&#039;t do you an ounce of good.  Neener.

Thanks: Clint Ecker.  Hat tips to Venomous Kate and James Joyner, neither of whom have seen fit to install it themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Attention Comment Spammers</strong><br />
You can still spam this site if you want, but it won't do you an ounce of good.  Neener.</p>
<p>Thanks: Clint Ecker.  Hat tips to Venomous Kate and James Joyner, neither of whom have seen fit to install it themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-32500</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8879#comment-32500</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve installed it myself.  It doesn&#039;t stop you from inserting links, it doesn&#039;t prevent the links from working, and it doesn&#039;t even make them look any different to the reader.  All it does is prevent Google, Yahoo!, etc. spiders from following them and counting them toward the rankings.

This one&#039;s a no-brainer.  Everyone should install it yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've installed it myself.  It doesn't stop you from inserting links, it doesn't prevent the links from working, and it doesn't even make them look any different to the reader.  All it does is prevent Google, Yahoo!, etc. spiders from following them and counting them toward the rankings.</p>
<p>This one's a no-brainer.  Everyone should install it yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Venom</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-32452</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Venom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8879#comment-32452</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Second Look At rel=nofollow&lt;/strong&gt;
Earlier this week I wrote about Google&#039;s decision to recognize the rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; tag that&#039;s supposed to take away the incentive for spammers who try to boost their page rankings with annoying URL-laden comments.

After some thought, and some wor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Second Look At rel=nofollow</strong><br />
Earlier this week I wrote about Google's decision to recognize the rel="nofollow" tag that's supposed to take away the incentive for spammers who try to boost their page rankings with annoying URL-laden comments.</p>
<p>After some thought, and some wor...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-32343</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8879#comment-32343</guid>
		<description>ExpressionEngine is onboard also -- just posted a &quot;nofollow&quot; plugin with a couple of switches written in: If you&#039;re a registered member of the blog and are logged in, it can be set so that you can post any link without getting the attribute, and there&#039;s a setting to leave it off links that are in the local whitelist.

I think I might use it but I&#039;d still rely more on Captchas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ExpressionEngine is onboard also -- just posted a "nofollow" plugin with a couple of switches written in: If you're a registered member of the blog and are logged in, it can be set so that you can post any link without getting the attribute, and there's a setting to leave it off links that are in the local whitelist.</p>
<p>I think I might use it but I'd still rely more on Captchas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-32306</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8879#comment-32306</guid>
		<description>An additional thought, if the search engines would separately count and rank hyperlinks appearing in comment sections (with the nofollow tag) then the largest number/highest rankeed would be those place by spam robots and would be a way of identifying sites benefitting from spamming for boycotting, legal action, etc.. 

Most bloggers placing links manually would probably not be doing so to the extent that it would trigger an &quot;I&#039;m a spammer&quot; flag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An additional thought, if the search engines would separately count and rank hyperlinks appearing in comment sections (with the nofollow tag) then the largest number/highest rankeed would be those place by spam robots and would be a way of identifying sites benefitting from spamming for boycotting, legal action, etc.. </p>
<p>Most bloggers placing links manually would probably not be doing so to the extent that it would trigger an "I'm a spammer" flag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-32304</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8879#comment-32304</guid>
		<description>The way I read it is that you can still put the hyperlinks in the comments, just the search engines won&#039;t take it into account for ranking. This should disincent spammers from placing hyperlinks in the comments, maybe without actually preventing it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I read it is that you can still put the hyperlinks in the comments, just the search engines won't take it into account for ranking. This should disincent spammers from placing hyperlinks in the comments, maybe without actually preventing it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric Venom :: A Second Look At rel=nofollow</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/new_html_fights_comment_spam/comment-page-1/#comment-32451</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Venom :: A Second Look At rel=nofollow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=8879#comment-32451</guid>
		<description>[...] ings with annoying URL-laden comments. 	After some thought, and some words of caution from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/8879&quot;&gt;James Joyner&lt;/a&gt;, I explained that I wasn&#8217;t going to be incorporating the tag. Because, just as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ings with annoying URL-laden comments. 	After some thought, and some words of caution from <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/8879">James Joyner</a>, I explained that I wasn&#8217;t going to be incorporating the tag. Because, just as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
