working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

New York Times Investigates Adoption Records of John Roberts Children

Well it looks like the New York Times is taking its cues from the Daily Kos. Drudge is reporting that the New York Times is investigating the adoption records of John Roberts. I have to pause and wonder…did the New York Times do any investigation into Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg children? Or what about Justice Stephen G. Breyer? If this really is “routine” as the New York Times suggests then the answer must be yes. Does anybody know if this was the case? If the answer is no, I can’t help but think that politics is playing a role here.

Update: Hugh Hewitt has a pretty big roundup on this. So far the general reaction has been: It is a sleazy tactic. It is pretty dirty going after the guys kids.

About the Author: Steve has a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, Los Angeles and attended graduate school at The George Washington University, leaving school shortly before staring work on his dissertation when his first child was born. He works in the energy industry and prior to that worked at the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the Division of Price Index and Number Research.
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack
 
Comments
 

This is contemptible. Whether or not they did it to anyone else (I'm betting they didn't), it's contemptible.

Posted by wavemaker | August 4, 2005 | 02:44 pm | Permalink
 

Politics, huh? Do ya' think?

Posted by dougrc | August 4, 2005 | 03:49 pm | Permalink
 

Ya never know what might turn up. Maybe he bought the kids from an unregulated baby mill or -- or -- or maybe they're really not adopted after all, but he and his wife tell them they're adopted as a form of mental cruelty.

You can never tell unless you investigate!

[/New York Times]

Posted by McGehee | August 4, 2005 | 05:24 pm | Permalink
 

All this time, I thought liberals and the liberal press held the "right to privacy" as sacred. I guess it doesn't apply to conservatives or children. If the NYTimes-Democrat goes ahead with this, I predict the Mother Of All Backlashes, against the Times and against Democrats.

Posted by paladin | August 4, 2005 | 05:33 pm | Permalink
 

Unless he received the kids from Osama bin Laden in return for pledge of undying loyalty, I can't see the point. No one's alleged that yet, have they?

Posted by Anderson | August 4, 2005 | 07:04 pm | Permalink
 

Just when you think the MSM can't sink any lower, they find ways to do exactly that! Shades of checking out what movies Justice Thomas rented. Eeeuuuuwww.

Posted by ozzippit | August 4, 2005 | 09:46 pm | Permalink
 
Posted by dalin | August 4, 2005 | 11:21 pm | Permalink
 
Posted by dalin | August 4, 2005 | 11:23 pm | Permalink
 

Thomas's movies were actually quasi-relevant, given the allegations that he alluded to porn flicks at work.

Posted by Anderson | August 5, 2005 | 12:03 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog

View blog authority



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.