<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Loophole Skirts Journalistic Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:20:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-140124</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/#comment-140124</guid>
		<description>Ok, thinking some more, I would ban:

&quot;Paris Hilton&quot;
&quot;Lindsey Lohan&quot;
&quot;Brittany Spears&quot;

and whoever the latest &quot;blond white girl&quot; is in the news these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, thinking some more, I would ban:</p>
<p>"Paris Hilton"<br />
"Lindsey Lohan"<br />
"Brittany Spears"</p>
<p>and whoever the latest "blond white girl" is in the news these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-140123</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/#comment-140123</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In a slightly different vein,Id ban abortion,pro choice, progress ,180 million years,prehistoric,cave man,consensus, and separation of church and state.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Leave it to G.A.Phillips to equate censorship with clarification.

That said, I&#039;d ban the use of the word &quot;internet&quot;, simply because I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever heard a story about it that got anything right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In a slightly different vein,Id ban abortion,pro choice, progress ,180 million years,prehistoric,cave man,consensus, and separation of church and state.</p></blockquote>
<p>Leave it to G.A.Phillips to equate censorship with clarification.</p>
<p>That said, I'd ban the use of the word "internet", simply because I don't think I've ever heard a story about it that got anything right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.A.Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-140062</link>
		<dc:creator>G.A.Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/#comment-140062</guid>
		<description>In a slightly different vein,Id ban  abortion,pro choice, progress ,180 million years,prehistoric,cave man,consensus, and separation of church and state. 

There are other words that reporters and headline writers routinely use that also insinuate  rightdoing without having to actually provide any evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a slightly different vein,Id ban  abortion,pro choice, progress ,180 million years,prehistoric,cave man,consensus, and separation of church and state. </p>
<p>There are other words that reporters and headline writers routinely use that also insinuate  rightdoing without having to actually provide any evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-140024</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/#comment-140024</guid>
		<description>death tax
tax relief

What words would you substitute for &quot;loophole&quot;, &quot;assault weapon&quot;, or &quot;fundamentalist&quot;?

I have to whole heartedly agree with getting rid of &quot;some say.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>death tax<br />
tax relief</p>
<p>What words would you substitute for "loophole", "assault weapon", or "fundamentalist"?</p>
<p>I have to whole heartedly agree with getting rid of "some say."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-139974</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/#comment-139974</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It is reported/understood that...&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;According to an anonymous source...&lt;/em&gt;

Selectively pointing out party affiliation of the subject of a report. Name all party affiliations or none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It is reported/understood that...</em><br />
<em>According to an anonymous source...</em></p>
<p>Selectively pointing out party affiliation of the subject of a report. Name all party affiliations or none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale B</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-139933</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/#comment-139933</guid>
		<description>In a slightly different vein, I&#039;d ban &quot;may&quot; and &quot;could&quot; from all news reprorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a slightly different vein, I'd ban "may" and "could" from all news reprorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-139928</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/#comment-139928</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;admitted
fair (though usually by implication that its opposite is unfair; virtually impossible to use objectively)&lt;/em&gt;

Then there are the code words used to casually reinforce preconceptions:
&lt;em&gt;ultraconservative
fundamentalist
assault weapon&lt;/em&gt;

And my favorite method for subtly focusing the narrative:
&lt;em&gt;some say&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>admitted<br />
fair (though usually by implication that its opposite is unfair; virtually impossible to use objectively)</em></p>
<p>Then there are the code words used to casually reinforce preconceptions:<br />
<em>ultraconservative<br />
fundamentalist<br />
assault weapon</em></p>
<p>And my favorite method for subtly focusing the narrative:<br />
<em>some say</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/comment-page-1/#comment-139917</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/07/news_loophole_skirts_journalistic_ethics/#comment-139917</guid>
		<description>debate
narrative
unbiased (and its analogues as a description of news reporting)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>debate<br />
narrative<br />
unbiased (and its analogues as a description of news reporting)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
