<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newt Gingrich is Running For President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:25:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-38331</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-38331</guid>
		<description>I think a Gingrich Presidency is what this country needs. He has the inside understanding yet keeps his policies real world focused. Our United States deserves to Lead and Protect itself. Newt would bring it home!!

Gingrich 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a Gingrich Presidency is what this country needs. He has the inside understanding yet keeps his policies real world focused. Our United States deserves to Lead and Protect itself. Newt would bring it home!!</p>
<p>Gingrich 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-38210</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-38210</guid>
		<description>I think Newt would make an excellent President, but I think he&#039;d be most electable as a VP (if he&#039;d even accept that role).  I&#039;m having a tough time sorting out who should be VP and President, but here is a list:

1) Bill Owens as Presdent
2) Mitt Romeny as President or VP
3) Condi Rice as VP
4) Newt Gingrish as VP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Newt would make an excellent President, but I think he'd be most electable as a VP (if he'd even accept that role).  I'm having a tough time sorting out who should be VP and President, but here is a list:</p>
<p>1) Bill Owens as Presdent<br />
2) Mitt Romeny as President or VP<br />
3) Condi Rice as VP<br />
4) Newt Gingrish as VP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37177</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37177</guid>
		<description>Having had the pleasure of watching Gingrich wow an audience of 500 military leaders at the National Defense University, I hope Gingrich runs but ultimately doesn&#039;t carry the banner.  My rationale is as follows:  The guy is the torch bearer for &quot;the big picture idea&quot;.  I think the ideas he brings forward would help sharpen the picture for Repubs, but ultimately he now a Beltway insider and lacks the grassroots support (or building one) that a successful candidate would need.  

That being said, I think he&#039;s learned a lot from 1995-6 and would be a great piece to the 2008 puzzle.  I mean, the guy&#039;s an electrifying speaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had the pleasure of watching Gingrich wow an audience of 500 military leaders at the National Defense University, I hope Gingrich runs but ultimately doesn't carry the banner.  My rationale is as follows:  The guy is the torch bearer for "the big picture idea".  I think the ideas he brings forward would help sharpen the picture for Repubs, but ultimately he now a Beltway insider and lacks the grassroots support (or building one) that a successful candidate would need.  </p>
<p>That being said, I think he's learned a lot from 1995-6 and would be a great piece to the 2008 puzzle.  I mean, the guy's an electrifying speaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bachbone</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37165</link>
		<dc:creator>Bachbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37165</guid>
		<description>As is so often the case, everyone but the prospective candidate recognizes his/her flaws.  Gingrich should go back and read an objective analysis of his personal problems during his last year or two in Congress. If he is the best the GOP can do, it is in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is so often the case, everyone but the prospective candidate recognizes his/her flaws.  Gingrich should go back and read an objective analysis of his personal problems during his last year or two in Congress. If he is the best the GOP can do, it is in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37138</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37138</guid>
		<description>Bithead:  Someone was arguing that GWB was an ideas man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bithead:  Someone was arguing that GWB was an ideas man?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myopic Zeal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37128</link>
		<dc:creator>Myopic Zeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37128</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Newt Gingrich for President?&lt;/strong&gt;
Outside The Beltway points to Ace has an &quot;exclusive.&quot;  Highly reliable I&#039;m sure.


...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Newt Gingrich for President?</strong><br />
Outside The Beltway points to Ace has an "exclusive."  Highly reliable I'm sure.</p>
<p>...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37111</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37111</guid>
		<description>I would hate to see Gingrich run for President.  He&#039;s intelligent enough to know better. A Gingrich run would be the triumph of ego over wisdom.

I also boggle at the thought of Gingrich going up against (Hillary) Clinton again.  We all know how well that worked out last time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hate to see Gingrich run for President.  He's intelligent enough to know better. A Gingrich run would be the triumph of ego over wisdom.</p>
<p>I also boggle at the thought of Gingrich going up against (Hillary) Clinton again.  We all know how well that worked out last time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37108</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37108</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall the same arguments being made against GWB.
 
Interesting, how that worked out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall the same arguments being made against GWB.</p>
<p>Interesting, how that worked out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGehee</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37096</link>
		<dc:creator>McGehee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37096</guid>
		<description>George Washington managed to lead both the revolution and the government.

For all his good points, Newt is no George Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Washington managed to lead both the revolution and the government.</p>
<p>For all his good points, Newt is no George Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37094</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37094</guid>
		<description>As much as I like many of Newts ideas I think his time has past.  He should just let it go.  There&#039;s always going to be that doubt with him and that will forever hurt his chances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I like many of Newts ideas I think his time has past.  He should just let it go.  There's always going to be that doubt with him and that will forever hurt his chances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pinto</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37085</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37085</guid>
		<description>Some people are good at revolution, and some are good at governing.  Often, the two are not the same.  There&#039;s a certain point where the revolutionaries should step aside and let the more capable govern.  Newt was great at getting Republicans elected to Congress, but poor at running the Congress.  He should be out there working for the Republicans, not trying to run the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people are good at revolution, and some are good at governing.  Often, the two are not the same.  There's a certain point where the revolutionaries should step aside and let the more capable govern.  Newt was great at getting Republicans elected to Congress, but poor at running the Congress.  He should be out there working for the Republicans, not trying to run the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37079</link>
		<dc:creator>hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37079</guid>
		<description>&quot;O&quot; NO!!!!!!!!
Clinton had his &quot;pizza girl&quot; under the &quot;oval desk&quot;.
Newt will have his &quot;office girl&quot; bent over the &quot;oval desk&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"O" NO!!!!!!!!<br />
Clinton had his "pizza girl" under the "oval desk".<br />
Newt will have his "office girl" bent over the "oval desk"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack O'Toole &#187; Gingrich for president?</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-37137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack O'Toole &#187; Gingrich for president?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-37137</guid>
		<description>[...] looking Republican field, particularly on the hard right. Why not take a shot?  	Links via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/9333&quot;&gt;James Joyner&lt;/a&gt; and Glenn Reynolds. 	POSTSCRIPT: Speaking of Glenn, his wife Helen&#8217;s surgery is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looking Republican field, particularly on the hard right. Why not take a shot?  	Links via <a href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/9333">James Joyner</a> and Glenn Reynolds. 	POSTSCRIPT: Speaking of Glenn, his wife Helen&#8217;s surgery is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.elephantsordonkeys.com</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/newt_gingrich_is_running_for_president/comment-page-1/#comment-124180</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.elephantsordonkeys.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=9333#comment-124180</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Bill Clinton. Neither will ever be president and that’s a very good thing.  ________  Related:  What About Newt? (Greg Tinti)  Gingrich May Run in 2008 If No Front-Runner Emerges  Newt Gingrich: Unorthodox Visionary?  Newt Gingrich to the Rescue?  Newt Gingrich is Running For President  Newt Gingrich Running in 2008?  NEWT THE STRATEGIST  EATING OUR YOUNG   [IMG]  [IMG] &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Bill Clinton. Neither will ever be president and that&rsquo;s a very good thing.  ________  Related:  What About Newt? (Greg Tinti)  Gingrich May Run in 2008 If No Front-Runner Emerges  Newt Gingrich: Unorthodox Visionary?  Newt Gingrich to the Rescue?  Newt Gingrich is Running For President  Newt Gingrich Running in 2008?  NEWT THE STRATEGIST  EATING OUR YOUNG   [IMG]  [IMG] <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
