working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Ninth Circuit OKs Laptop Searches at the Border

The Ninth Circuit has ruled that the Federal Government can search through the contents of laptops and other personal data devices, without cause, of people who are coming through the border.

Federal agents at the border do not need any reason to search through travelers’ laptops, cell phones or digital cameras for evidence of crimes, a federal appeals court ruled Monday, extending the government’s power to look through belongings like suitcases at the border to electronics.

[...]

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the government, finding that the so-called border exception to the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches applied not just to suitcases and papers, but also to electronics.

You can read the full ruling of the Court here. I am not surprised by this result, as the courts have held over the past several decades that a border search is “automatically reasonable” by its nature. Indeed, the Fourth Circuit has already previously ruled that laptop searches of this nature are permissible.

Personally, I disagree with this doctrine, noting simply that the Fourth Amendment does not provide any exception for searches at the border, and given that the Founding Fathers were well aware of the concept of Customs Officers, they could have easily included such an exception had they felt it warranted.

About the Author: Alex has a B.S. in Biochemistry from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and a J.D. from the University of Kansas School of Law. He has been published in the Kansas City Star, TCS Daily, and Comic Book Resources. He joined the staff of OTB in June 2006. Additionally, he’s been writing at Heretical Ideas since October, 2001, and also reviews cigars at Cigar Jack's Cigar News and Reviews.
 
 
Related Stories:
 
Recent Stories:
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

What sort of rationale is required to make border searches exclusionary? Particularly of citizens.

Posted by Brian | April 23, 2008 | 12:14 pm | Permalink
 

Of course a government has the right as part of enforcing a border (if such a wild concept was actually done) to search persons coming in for contraband.

It's not a search as it is a condition of entry.

The fact is a person seeking entry doesn't have to consent. They can refuse and walk away. That of course means they walk back into the country where they were at. If a person seeks entry through a port of convienance, say at an airport and is thus already on American soil, they have thus given permission to search as having entered into the country.

As to the argument that the founders didn't mention searches at the border, perhaps it's because it seems so very obvious and is within the tradition of all countries to inspect those and their property as a condition of entry.

Posted by Tim | April 23, 2008 | 01:26 pm | Permalink
 

a camera or a laptop may contain a persons creative work .these are considered intellectual property and the search of and possible theft of could cost the owner a fortune . it has been shown time after time that not all federal agents are trustworthy. many are in fact low down thieving snakes in the grass. when the federal government can control thier own agents they should be allowed to surf other peoples laptops. not before

Posted by c. lelamd | April 23, 2008 | 03:20 pm | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog

View blog authority



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.