<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nonpartisan Congressional Redistricting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:21:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William d'Inger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-114063</link>
		<dc:creator>William d'Inger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 03:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/#comment-114063</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It wouldn’t be too hard to come up with fairly simple algorithm for elimanting gerrymandering by insisting an minimizing the ratio of the border of a voting district to the area of a voting dictrict, but it just has no chance of actually being enacted.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The problem with the algorithm approach is that it would violate the Voting Rights Act in the Southern states. Under the act, redistricting must not dilute minority voting power. Those states are so heavily gerrymandered to create black majority voting districts that &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; rational redistricting would be a violation of the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It wouldn&rsquo;t be too hard to come up with fairly simple algorithm for elimanting gerrymandering by insisting an minimizing the ratio of the border of a voting district to the area of a voting dictrict, but it just has no chance of actually being enacted.</p></blockquote>
<p>The problem with the algorithm approach is that it would violate the Voting Rights Act in the Southern states. Under the act, redistricting must not dilute minority voting power. Those states are so heavily gerrymandered to create black majority voting districts that <em>any</em> rational redistricting would be a violation of the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-113885</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/#comment-113885</guid>
		<description>It wouldn&#039;t be too hard to come up with fairly simple algorithm for elimanting gerrymandering by insisting an minimizing the ratio of the border of a voting district to the area of a voting dictrict, but it just has no chance of actually being enacted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn't be too hard to come up with fairly simple algorithm for elimanting gerrymandering by insisting an minimizing the ratio of the border of a voting district to the area of a voting dictrict, but it just has no chance of actually being enacted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-113882</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/#comment-113882</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Podcast #202: The Circle of Reform...&lt;/strong&gt;

I take on Stephen Bainbridge&#039;s idea for creating a national redistricting commission to create competitive districts and explain &quot;The Circle of Reform.&quot;

Click here to download.


	        



Hat Tip: Outside the Beltway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Podcast #202: The Circle of Reform...</strong></p>
<p>I take on Stephen Bainbridge's idea for creating a national redistricting commission to create competitive districts and explain "The Circle of Reform."</p>
<p>Click here to download.</p>
<p>Hat Tip: Outside the Beltway...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yetanotherjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-113862</link>
		<dc:creator>yetanotherjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/#comment-113862</guid>
		<description>I think you go about this &quot;slowly&quot;. You first set an objective standard as the default. For example, start with the most eastern part of a state, then go to the northern corner of the county (or parish in Louisiana). Then starting adding counties until you have 1/x people in the state in the district (where X is the number of representatives the state gets). The added counties would be those contiguous to the initial county spiraling outward. If you need to add parts of a county to com out even (e.g. in heavily urban areas), do the same thing with the country (start in North east corner) and increment in 1 square mile increments.

The resulting districts will be relatively geometrically compact, but are not likely to correspond to any established media or population groupings.

Now make this the default redistricting plan. If the state legislature can&#039;t reach consensus or the plan they adopt is found to be unconstitutional, this becomes the default plan the state falls back on. 

An arbitrary plan that only looks at geography is likely to be the only true &quot;non-partisan&quot; plan possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you go about this "slowly". You first set an objective standard as the default. For example, start with the most eastern part of a state, then go to the northern corner of the county (or parish in Louisiana). Then starting adding counties until you have 1/x people in the state in the district (where X is the number of representatives the state gets). The added counties would be those contiguous to the initial county spiraling outward. If you need to add parts of a county to com out even (e.g. in heavily urban areas), do the same thing with the country (start in North east corner) and increment in 1 square mile increments.</p>
<p>The resulting districts will be relatively geometrically compact, but are not likely to correspond to any established media or population groupings.</p>
<p>Now make this the default redistricting plan. If the state legislature can't reach consensus or the plan they adopt is found to be unconstitutional, this becomes the default plan the state falls back on. </p>
<p>An arbitrary plan that only looks at geography is likely to be the only true "non-partisan" plan possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bandit</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-113832</link>
		<dc:creator>Bandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/#comment-113832</guid>
		<description>You could map redistricting based on population and travel in about a week with off the shelf optimizization software. Funny they haven&#039;t tried that yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could map redistricting based on population and travel in about a week with off the shelf optimizization software. Funny they haven't tried that yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustbury.com</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-113808</link>
		<dc:creator>dustbury.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/#comment-113808</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Because they mind, I draw the line...&lt;/strong&gt;

Professor Bainbridge has an idea: The national disgrace of gerrymandering has created a system in which the vast majority of House seats are safe for one of the two parties. As a result, the real action is in the primaries,......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Because they mind, I draw the line...</strong></p>
<p>Professor Bainbridge has an idea: The national disgrace of gerrymandering has created a system in which the vast majority of House seats are safe for one of the two parties. As a result, the real action is in the primaries,......</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William d'Inger</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-113781</link>
		<dc:creator>William d'Inger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/#comment-113781</guid>
		<description>Somebody&#039;s inhaling premium crack if they believe that would ever fly. Politics &lt;em&gt;IS&lt;/em&gt; partisanship by definition. &quot;Nonpartisan&quot; is one of those fantasy words like &quot;fair&quot; and &quot;equal&quot; that one uses to fool children who still believe in Santa. I can&#039;t imagine why you devoted space to such a boneheaded idea (unless your purpose was to show lunacy in action).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody's inhaling premium crack if they believe that would ever fly. Politics <em>IS</em> partisanship by definition. "Nonpartisan" is one of those fantasy words like "fair" and "equal" that one uses to fool children who still believe in Santa. I can't imagine why you devoted space to such a boneheaded idea (unless your purpose was to show lunacy in action).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/comment-page-1/#comment-113764</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/02/nonpartisan_congressional_redistricting/#comment-113764</guid>
		<description>It seems naive to imagine a nonpartisan committee could be selected or sustained for any length of time when power in Washington is at stake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems naive to imagine a nonpartisan committee could be selected or sustained for any length of time when power in Washington is at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
