<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Divided After All?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:35:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18498</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18498</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;the nature of the discourse, because of the ability to narrowly target oneâs audience on niche programming, is much coarser than it has been in living memory&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;True enough, but we did have this little thing called the Iraq war.  A contentious and still hotly debated subject.  It&#039;s not like flag burning or gay marriage or whether we should have abortions.  It was a very unusual event that was extremely emotional - to both sides.

And when you start throwing patriotism into the mix - i.e. where the stance on the Iraq war becomes a defining issue of such - people are going to get hot under the collar.  Throw in a highly visceral issue of sanctioned torture and it would be stunning if people didn&#039;t start shouting. 

These may be one or two issues out of a million that people mostly agree upon, but they mean a lot to both sides of the isle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>the nature of the discourse, because of the ability to narrowly target oneâs audience on niche programming, is much coarser than it has been in living memory</i></p></blockquote>
<p>True enough, but we did have this little thing called the Iraq war.  A contentious and still hotly debated subject.  It's not like flag burning or gay marriage or whether we should have abortions.  It was a very unusual event that was extremely emotional - to both sides.</p>
<p>And when you start throwing patriotism into the mix - i.e. where the stance on the Iraq war becomes a defining issue of such - people are going to get hot under the collar.  Throw in a highly visceral issue of sanctioned torture and it would be stunning if people didn't start shouting. </p>
<p>These may be one or two issues out of a million that people mostly agree upon, but they mean a lot to both sides of the isle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18499</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18499</guid>
		<description>I could boil this article down to simple economic theory. Special interst groups and the media have a great interest ($$$) to promote the idea of a divided nation. It gets them donations and viewers. So the folks working in these fields get more pay.

BTW, the entire article is very worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could boil this article down to simple economic theory. Special interst groups and the media have a great interest ($$$) to promote the idea of a divided nation. It gets them donations and viewers. So the folks working in these fields get more pay.</p>
<p>BTW, the entire article is very worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18500</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18500</guid>
		<description>Well, on the one hand, my girlfriend and I went over to a barbeque last Saturday hosted by a strongly Democratic blogger, and everybody involved had themselves a fine time.

On the other hand, this simple fact was apparently bemusing as all get-out to certain of Kevin Drum&#039;s comment section.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, on the one hand, my girlfriend and I went over to a barbeque last Saturday hosted by a strongly Democratic blogger, and everybody involved had themselves a fine time.</p>
<p>On the other hand, this simple fact was apparently bemusing as all get-out to certain of Kevin Drum's comment section.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18501</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18501</guid>
		<description>You know I&#039;ve never met anyone (including myself) who thinks anyone&#039;s stance on the Iraq war--at least in terms of for or against--defines anyone&#039;s patriotism. I suppose there might be such folks out there, but I&#039;ve never met any of them.

I do question the patriotism of people who harp on failure, ignore successes, and call our leaders liars or, worse, compare them to Nazis, when they simply disagree with them. Because that&#039;s demoralizing and unnecessary. Ditto people who call America a &quot;terrorist nation&quot; or claim we are merely going to war because we are racists or want oil--and that is stuff I&#039;ve heard constantly, and that too strikes me as unpatriotic. For such things go well beyond, &quot;I don&#039;t believe this was the right war,&quot; or &quot;I believe we should conduct ourselves differently,&quot; that&#039;s just saying hateful things about your country.

But getting people to understand that distinction is a constant challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I've never met anyone (including myself) who thinks anyone's stance on the Iraq war--at least in terms of for or against--defines anyone's patriotism. I suppose there might be such folks out there, but I've never met any of them.</p>
<p>I do question the patriotism of people who harp on failure, ignore successes, and call our leaders liars or, worse, compare them to Nazis, when they simply disagree with them. Because that's demoralizing and unnecessary. Ditto people who call America a "terrorist nation" or claim we are merely going to war because we are racists or want oil--and that is stuff I've heard constantly, and that too strikes me as unpatriotic. For such things go well beyond, "I don't believe this was the right war," or "I believe we should conduct ourselves differently," that's just saying hateful things about your country.</p>
<p>But getting people to understand that distinction is a constant challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18502</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Esmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18502</guid>
		<description>Er, that should be &quot;getting SOME people to understand that distinction is a constant challenge.&quot;

Most people I know get it perfectly. You don&#039;t liken America or its President to Nazi Germany, or an oppressive imperialist hegemonic power only interested in oil, or uncritically accept claims that our troops regularly massacre innocent civilians, and then get to call yourself a patriot.

Mind you, there is no law saying you have to be a patriot. You can hate your country all you want--that&#039;s your right as an American, after all. But I&#039;m trying to imagine saying to my son, &quot;You&#039;re a vile, hateful, murdering rapist, the worst and most horrible person on the planet, but don&#039;t question the fact that I love you.&quot; Uh, riiiiiight....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, that should be "getting SOME people to understand that distinction is a constant challenge."</p>
<p>Most people I know get it perfectly. You don't liken America or its President to Nazi Germany, or an oppressive imperialist hegemonic power only interested in oil, or uncritically accept claims that our troops regularly massacre innocent civilians, and then get to call yourself a patriot.</p>
<p>Mind you, there is no law saying you have to be a patriot. You can hate your country all you want--that's your right as an American, after all. But I'm trying to imagine saying to my son, "You're a vile, hateful, murdering rapist, the worst and most horrible person on the planet, but don't question the fact that I love you." Uh, riiiiiight....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18503</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18503</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Partisanship in America and Some Historical Perspective&lt;/strong&gt;
Robert Tagorda, James Joyner and Kevin Drum all comment on a piece today&#039;s NYT that I noted this morning, but didn&#039;t have time to comment upon. I concur with the basic thesis of the piece: we are not as divided...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Partisanship in America and Some Historical Perspective</strong><br />
Robert Tagorda, James Joyner and Kevin Drum all comment on a piece today's NYT that I noted this morning, but didn't have time to comment upon. I concur with the basic thesis of the piece: we are not as divided...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18504</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18504</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Political Polarization In Mainstream America A Myth?&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner points to this New York Times piece by John Tierney that shows us that the so-called political polarization is more a myth created...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Political Polarization In Mainstream America A Myth?</strong><br />
James Joyner points to this New York Times piece by John Tierney that shows us that the so-called political polarization is more a myth created...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalblog</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18505</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18505</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rhetoric Versus Belief&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner claims that the new divisions in politics are normal as we find new things to fight over, while settling past disputes. To some extent, he&#039;s right. However, I&#039;d argue that we&#039;re fighting over far less than we used...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rhetoric Versus Belief</strong><br />
James Joyner claims that the new divisions in politics are normal as we find new things to fight over, while settling past disputes. To some extent, he's right. However, I'd argue that we're fighting over far less than we used...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean's World</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/not_divided_after_all/comment-page-1/#comment-18506</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean's World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6424#comment-18506</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Country Not So Divided?&lt;/strong&gt;
James Joyner has some interesting commentary on how little-divided the country actually is as compared to how divided we often think it is. It seems...

---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Country Not So Divided?</strong><br />
James Joyner has some interesting commentary on how little-divided the country actually is as compared to how divided we often think it is. It seems...</p>
<p>---</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
