<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NSA Accidentally Listened to Domestic Calls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:46:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yeff</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/comment-page-1/#comment-68885</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=13059#comment-68885</guid>
		<description>Boyd wrote, 
&lt;blockquote&gt;And that was exactly the case when I worked for NSA and we inadvertently collected communications we shouldnât have.

Precisely right, Jonk.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wss a SIGINT analyst with the USAF and I can confirm what Boyd says.  We took inadvertant intercept of US citizens rather seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boyd wrote, </p>
<blockquote><p>And that was exactly the case when I worked for NSA and we inadvertently collected communications we shouldnât have.</p>
<p>Precisely right, Jonk.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I wss a SIGINT analyst with the USAF and I can confirm what Boyd says.  We took inadvertant intercept of US citizens rather seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/comment-page-1/#comment-68834</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=13059#comment-68834</guid>
		<description>In any event, people;

These are logistical issues, not legalistic.
Once again, the question becomes, how much do we invest in keeping the Demorats and their newfound &#039;civil libertarian&#039; mask, happy? 

Seems to me in wartime, which we are deciedly living in,  the information gathered is utimately of greater import than the opposition party&#039;s being able to get a &#039;dig&#039; in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any event, people;</p>
<p>These are logistical issues, not legalistic.<br />
Once again, the question becomes, how much do we invest in keeping the Demorats and their newfound 'civil libertarian' mask, happy? </p>
<p>Seems to me in wartime, which we are deciedly living in,  the information gathered is utimately of greater import than the opposition party's being able to get a 'dig' in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/comment-page-1/#comment-68828</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=13059#comment-68828</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As long as the errors are made in good faith and the data destroyed upon discovery of the error, no harm, no foul.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And that was exactly the case when I worked for NSA and we inadvertently collected communications we shouldn&#039;t have.

Precisely right, Jonk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As long as the errors are made in good faith and the data destroyed upon discovery of the error, no harm, no foul.</p></blockquote>
<p>And that was exactly the case when I worked for NSA and we inadvertently collected communications we shouldn't have.</p>
<p>Precisely right, Jonk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonk</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/comment-page-1/#comment-68822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=13059#comment-68822</guid>
		<description>As long as the errors are made in good faith and the data destroyed upon discovery of the error, no harm, no foul.  

It happens in everyday life.  How many faxes have you gotten at your home or office with personal info that you should not have access to?  What do you do?  Shred and throw away.  There is nothing nefarious in this story.  

I just hope the more deliberate obfuscation of these intelligence story issues will stop...but I am not counting on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the errors are made in good faith and the data destroyed upon discovery of the error, no harm, no foul.  </p>
<p>It happens in everyday life.  How many faxes have you gotten at your home or office with personal info that you should not have access to?  What do you do?  Shred and throw away.  There is nothing nefarious in this story.  </p>
<p>I just hope the more deliberate obfuscation of these intelligence story issues will stop...but I am not counting on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/comment-page-1/#comment-68819</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=13059#comment-68819</guid>
		<description>The GPS angle at best only applies to the &quot;known&quot; side of the call. Also if the GPS is working in the US, why wiretap at all, just go pick the target up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GPS angle at best only applies to the "known" side of the call. Also if the GPS is working in the US, why wiretap at all, just go pick the target up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/comment-page-1/#comment-68813</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=13059#comment-68813</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no telco guy, but I was under the impression that there has been enormous pressure on cell phone companies to put geolocation functions into their systems for 911 usage. Was that capability used to try &amp; cut the &#039;risk level&#039; in these taps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm no telco guy, but I was under the impression that there has been enormous pressure on cell phone companies to put geolocation functions into their systems for 911 usage. Was that capability used to try &amp; cut the 'risk level' in these taps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Murcek</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/comment-page-1/#comment-68811</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Murcek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=13059#comment-68811</guid>
		<description>Of course, when it suits the left&#039;s purposes, there&#039;s no such thing as an &quot;honest&quot; mistake.  Perfection is the only standard they&#039;ll accept.  Unless it&#039;s someone like, say, Bill Clinton making the mistake.

Then it&#039;s OK.

Because &quot;that&#039;s different...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, when it suits the left's purposes, there's no such thing as an "honest" mistake.  Perfection is the only standard they'll accept.  Unless it's someone like, say, Bill Clinton making the mistake.</p>
<p>Then it's OK.</p>
<p>Because "that's different..."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nsa_accidentally_listened_to_domestic_calls_/comment-page-1/#comment-68810</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=13059#comment-68810</guid>
		<description>Inadvertantly making international calls is problematic for me working here in Dearborn, MI.
I&#039;m close enough to Canada that If I leave my cell phone on &quot;Roam&quot; I might connect via a Canadian cell tower and then be calling back to the US and incurring huge, (as opposed to already included) charges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inadvertantly making international calls is problematic for me working here in Dearborn, MI.<br />
I'm close enough to Canada that If I leave my cell phone on "Roam" I might connect via a Canadian cell tower and then be calling back to the US and incurring huge, (as opposed to already included) charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
