<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nude Photos of Jennifer Aniston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nude_photos_of_jennifer_aniston/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nude_photos_of_jennifer_aniston/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:01:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nude_photos_of_jennifer_aniston/comment-page-1/#comment-67237</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12910#comment-67237</guid>
		<description>As to the supposedly nude shots, I will say it&#039;s interesting what some people will photoshop.

Move along folks, nothing to see here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to the supposedly nude shots, I will say it's interesting what some people will photoshop.</p>
<p>Move along folks, nothing to see here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nude_photos_of_jennifer_aniston/comment-page-1/#comment-67218</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12910#comment-67218</guid>
		<description>Well, poor Jen has been through a lot.

What gets me is the item I clicked through about the U-Penn student who photographed the couple &quot;making love&quot; at their window.  How on earth does anyone have sex in the window and not expect to be seen and photographed?  I imagine those kids were all into being seen at the time, and only when their rational selves prevailed did they think &quot;hey, maybe that wasn&#039;t so clever.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, poor Jen has been through a lot.</p>
<p>What gets me is the item I clicked through about the U-Penn student who photographed the couple "making love" at their window.  How on earth does anyone have sex in the window and not expect to be seen and photographed?  I imagine those kids were all into being seen at the time, and only when their rational selves prevailed did they think "hey, maybe that wasn't so clever."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical Cubed</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nude_photos_of_jennifer_aniston/comment-page-1/#comment-67214</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical Cubed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12910#comment-67214</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t about privacy.  It&#039;s about exactly the opposite.  Tie this legal action in with another legal threat she just made where she stated she might sue any publication that printed stories about her hanging out with Vince Vaughn claiming they were false and then, voila, presto change-o we hear that they were both in a car stopped by police a few days ago in Arizona because of suspected DUI. This is nothing more than a publicity gimmick for more attention.  She must love this game with the press! Now, if she really doesn&#039;t want people to look at her then she shouldn&#039;t pose topless for GQ. If we all quit telling her she is America&#039;s sweetheart and recognize that she is nothing more than a spotlight-seeking-glory-hound who should really be replaced by a breed of the Bassett variety, the world would be a better place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn't about privacy.  It's about exactly the opposite.  Tie this legal action in with another legal threat she just made where she stated she might sue any publication that printed stories about her hanging out with Vince Vaughn claiming they were false and then, voila, presto change-o we hear that they were both in a car stopped by police a few days ago in Arizona because of suspected DUI. This is nothing more than a publicity gimmick for more attention.  She must love this game with the press! Now, if she really doesn't want people to look at her then she shouldn't pose topless for GQ. If we all quit telling her she is America's sweetheart and recognize that she is nothing more than a spotlight-seeking-glory-hound who should really be replaced by a breed of the Bassett variety, the world would be a better place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/nude_photos_of_jennifer_aniston/comment-page-1/#comment-67213</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12910#comment-67213</guid>
		<description>Clicked the link ... &quot;yup, those are breasts,&quot; I thought ... then I wondered why we are so crazy to see a given celebrity&#039;s breasts, as opposed to the terrifying number of bare breasts to be seen elsewhere on the Internet.

Men are strange creatures, aren&#039;t we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clicked the link ... "yup, those are breasts," I thought ... then I wondered why we are so crazy to see a given celebrity's breasts, as opposed to the terrifying number of bare breasts to be seen elsewhere on the Internet.</p>
<p>Men are strange creatures, aren't we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
