Just for a bit of perspective:

June 3-6 Gallup poll in 2004:

Kerry 50%
Bush 44%

ANY lead that Obama has shows just what idiots the voters are.

Obama may go down in history as the biggest empty suit EVER

As to how things go from here to the end is anybody's guess...

But I feel the need to point out that yes, Obama will make the inevitable gaffes (and maybe even a few unpleasant "facts" will come out)but so will McCain...

Like his speech last Tuesday???? (Gawd... even I was embarressed) and when it comes to unpleasant facts.... McCain has a long record (can any one say "Keating 5")... Is any one surprised by why the right is so uncomfortable with him (despite his agreeing with Bush 95% of the time in the past year???) which will alienate the 70+% of those who think Bush is wrong on this that or the other.

Minus a meteor hitting the Obama express dead on, McCain is toast.

His base hates him because 5% of the time he votes against Bush, 70% of the rest of the country hates Bush, and because McCain votes with Bush 95% of the time, him too. So what does that leave him with???

I will only say that it will be a lot closer because of the "Bradley" effect than it would otherwise be.

June 3-6 Gallup poll in 2004:

Kerry 50%
Bush 44%

Meaningless. Bush was running as an incumbent. McCain is running amidst the wreckage of Bush's policies.

Obama may go down in history as the biggest empty suit EVER

The stupidity of the "empty suit" line is self-evident. The Clinton political machine beat on the GOP with great regularity. Obama took it apart in a contest that began with Hillary holding every advantage.

A very unpopular incumbent at that point in the election, AS. And more unpopular now, if the polls mean anything.

With all of that, and with a far more charismatic and exciting candidate than the lamented JFKERRY, who has just vanquished a woman of some skill as a politician for the nomination, I would have expected a bit more of a bump than the sainted one has received.

Your argument eludes me, but it might be a bit subtle for a man of my advanced age.

John Kerry had a much larger lead four years ago than Obama does now

Not to pick nits, but it wasn't a much larger lead. In fact, it was exactly the same: six points.

the sainted one

What on Earth are you talking about?

Sorry AjinSan. I thought from reading all of the press paeans last week and this past weekend that the Democratic candidate for President had just been beatified.

Am I mistaken?

"Anjin-san" sorry.

I thought from reading all of the press paeans last week and this past weekend that the Democratic candidate for President had just been beatified.

It's cool vn... when I see how utterly weak the attacks on Obama in here are... well, it gives me a nice warm feeling about November.

Except for Christopher's brief comment, who was attacking anyone? We were analyzing data, weren't we?

beatified

the sainted one

Funny, I can't remember these from statistics...

We were analyzing data, weren't we?

Come now, don't run from your own remarks...

beatified
the sainted one

Funny, I can't remember these from statistics...

We were analyzing data, weren't we?

Come now, don't run from your own remarks...

How can you construe my implied criticism of hagiographic press coverage as an "attack" on Senator Obama?

Are you suggesting the coverage of his nomination victory in the LAT, the NYT, CNN or MSNBC has not been overwhelmingly positive?

Far from running away from my remarks, I reiterate. I am surprised that Obama is not trouncing his far older and less charismatic rival -- one who clings to many of the policies of a hated administration -- in a more convincing fashion.

That is not an "attack". It is a statement of my honest opinion.

I wasn't attacking anyone. Just stating a fact. Obama is an empty suit. Someone tell me one intelligent policy he has come up with that has been proven to work ever in the past anywhere.

See? Empty suit.

Someone tell me one intelligent policy he has come up with that has been proven to work ever in the past anywhere.

Well, concentrating on small states and caucus states worked out pretty well for him. Oh, and he was the only candidate who was against a gas tax holiday, which every expert said was a bad idea to begin with. Oh, and he's for open discussions with foreign leaders, which also has a lot of support both historically and from current experts. I'm particularly fond of his policies involving technology too.

Campaign strategies are NOT policies for running the country! OMG what a nerd you are!

You remind me of the Kennedy biographer who said presidential candidates should have experience, and that he supported Obama. When asked what he thought was Obama's experience, he said that it takes a lot to run a national presidential campaign. Soooo.....Obama's experience to be president was his actual running for president! LOL!!!! I would be funny if it wasn't so downright scary.

Christopher--what about Obama's bill in Illinois to videotape confessions? The police supported it, people on both sides of the spectrum eventually supported it. Since the bill passed, it's led to fewer coerced confessions, false confessions & imprisonments and fewer overturned confessions (because criminals who claimed they were abused could be disproven by the videotape).

You also might want to read this link: for more info about actual policies Obama's pursued while in the Senate.(among them: "Working for nuclear non-proliferation and securing loose stockpiles of conventional weapons, like shoulder-fired missiles. There he was again, passing what the Washington Post called "the strongest ethics legislation to emerge from Congress yet" -- though not as strong as Obama would have liked. Look -- he's over there, passing a bill that created a searchable database of recipients of federal contracts and grants, proposing legislation on avian flu back when most people hadn't even heard of it, working to make sure that soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan were screened for traumatic brain injury and to prevent homelessness among veterans, successfully fighting a proposal by the VA to reexamine all PTSD cases in which full benefits had been awarded, working to ban no-bid contracts in Katrina reconstruction...")
Just because *you* don't know about them, doesn't mean they don't exist.

Hmm, lets see..."intelligent", "he has come up with", "proven to work"....Nope, you didn't mention "governing" anywhere in there.

Michael,
It should be noted that neither McCain or Obama have executive experience along the lines of a governor. So your point is nonsensical.

Micheline, my point is that Christopher asked for nonspecific "policy", then complained that my examples were not "governing policy". To that point, my post was satirical but quite sensible.

Watch for the stand-alone polls to come out. Those tend to show more dramatic moves than the tracking polls. I have no idea why this is, but the Rasmussen and Gallup trackers have been extremely steady throughout this season. They seem to have low betas.

I don't buy the argument that Obama is more likely to make on-the-trail gaffes. McCain is at least as likely to make mistakes or, worse, deny that he has made a mistake that he has in fact made. Witness his denial of commenting on HRC's treatment by the media.

Also, I haven't seen it discussed much but don't you think that a 46 year old man in good health is simply going to be able to outwork a 71/72 year old (even if he is active for his age)? If I am managing Obama, I would look to schedule more events in more states than McCain is able to keep up with. Either you get more coverage or, if McCain tries to match your schedule, McCain becomes even more likely to commit gaffes.