<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Inauguration Declared &#8216;Emergency&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:02:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Routine Emergencies</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-623550</link>
		<dc:creator>Routine Emergencies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-623550</guid>
		<description>[...] Steyn, in a bit of delayed reaction to the news that the Obama inauguration has been declared an &#8220;emergency,&#8221; (the hazards of writing a regularly scheduled column rather than a blog, I guess),decries [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steyn, in a bit of delayed reaction to the news that the Obama inauguration has been declared an &#8220;emergency,&#8221; (the hazards of writing a regularly scheduled column rather than a blog, I guess),decries [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom p</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-591549</link>
		<dc:creator>tom p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-591549</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Without looking, I&#039;ll ask: Did FDR consider WWII&#039;s four years and it&#039;s funding requirements an emergency, I wonder?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Back then, wars were funded on a &quot;pay as you go&quot; basis, hence all the war bond drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Without looking, I'll ask: Did FDR consider WWII's four years and it's funding requirements an emergency, I wonder?</p></blockquote>
<p>Back then, wars were funded on a "pay as you go" basis, hence all the war bond drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-590315</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-590315</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Without looking, I&#039;ll ask: Did FDR consider WWII&#039;s four years and it&#039;s funding requirements an emergency, I wonder?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Without looking, I&#039;d think he didn&#039;t.  The immediate response after Pearl Harbor might have been.  I would hope he wasn&#039;t requesting &quot;emergency funds&quot; for recurring costs of the war effort throughout it&#039;s duration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Without looking, I'll ask: Did FDR consider WWII's four years and it's funding requirements an emergency, I wonder?</p></blockquote>
<p>Without looking, I'd think he didn't.  The immediate response after Pearl Harbor might have been.  I would hope he wasn't requesting "emergency funds" for recurring costs of the war effort throughout it's duration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-589902</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-589902</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Um, no, because like Dantheman said, it is not longer emergent in the fifth year. In fact, it&#039;s pretty well predictable that, by the fifth year, there is going to be a minimal cost. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Without looking, I&#039;ll ask: Did FDR consider WWII&#039;s four years and it&#039;s funding requirements an emergency, I wonder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Um, no, because like Dantheman said, it is not longer emergent in the fifth year. In fact, it's pretty well predictable that, by the fifth year, there is going to be a minimal cost. </p></blockquote>
<p>Without looking, I'll ask: Did FDR consider WWII's four years and it's funding requirements an emergency, I wonder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-588175</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-588175</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Technically, it was &quot;scheduled&quot; on October 15, 1933, pursuant to Sec. 5 of the just-ratified Twentieth Amendment. Nevertheless, very droll.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks.  And, yes, the technicality had occurred to me as well but I thought it funnier the other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Technically, it was "scheduled" on October 15, 1933, pursuant to Sec. 5 of the just-ratified Twentieth Amendment. Nevertheless, very droll.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thanks.  And, yes, the technicality had occurred to me as well but I thought it funnier the other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-586956</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-586956</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But, um, they originally expected upwards of 4 million people, according to a front page story in the Washington Post two months ago.&lt;/blockquote&gt;But presumably the city&#039;s planning started nearly a year ago, and was already being implemented two months ago.  How many did they expect when they put together the plan?  The implication of this action is that it was significantly less than 1.5 million.  

I&#039;m guessing that there isn&#039;t currently any better mechanism for the city to get this kind of help on such short notice, but wonder why it wasn&#039;t asked for two months ago when it could have been appropriated by the Congress.

&lt;blockquote&gt;IN fairness, at least it can be argued that a war is by definition an emergency action.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Um, no, because like Dantheman said, it is not longer emergent in the fifth year.  In fact, it&#039;s pretty well predictable that, by the fifth year, there is going to be a minimal cost.  

I don&#039;t think James would complain if they used emergency funding requests to fund unforeseen needs, but they have been using them to fund things they knew when the budget was created that they were going to need money for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But, um, they originally expected upwards of 4 million people, according to a front page story in the Washington Post two months ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>But presumably the city's planning started nearly a year ago, and was already being implemented two months ago.  How many did they expect when they put together the plan?  The implication of this action is that it was significantly less than 1.5 million.  </p>
<p>I'm guessing that there isn't currently any better mechanism for the city to get this kind of help on such short notice, but wonder why it wasn't asked for two months ago when it could have been appropriated by the Congress.</p>
<blockquote><p>IN fairness, at least it can be argued that a war is by definition an emergency action.</p></blockquote>
<p>Um, no, because like Dantheman said, it is not longer emergent in the fifth year.  In fact, it's pretty well predictable that, by the fifth year, there is going to be a minimal cost.  </p>
<p>I don't think James would complain if they used emergency funding requests to fund unforeseen needs, but they have been using them to fund things they knew when the budget was created that they were going to need money for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-586954</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-586954</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Next Tuesday’s inauguration, scheduled in 1789, has been declared a federal emergency.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Technically, it was &quot;scheduled&quot; on October 15, 1933, pursuant to Sec. 5 of the just-ratified Twentieth Amendment. Nevertheless, very droll..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Next Tuesday&rsquo;s inauguration, scheduled in 1789, has been declared a federal emergency.</p></blockquote>
<p>Technically, it was "scheduled" on October 15, 1933, pursuant to Sec. 5 of the just-ratified Twentieth Amendment. Nevertheless, very droll..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-579267</link>
		<dc:creator>Triumph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-579267</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, this is the same administration who has, for seven years running, failed to foresee that two ongoing wars would cause an additional strain on the budget and therefore had to rely on emergency appropriations to fund them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They also failed to protect the US from multiple terrorist attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course, this is the same administration who has, for seven years running, failed to foresee that two ongoing wars would cause an additional strain on the budget and therefore had to rely on emergency appropriations to fund them.</p></blockquote>
<p>They also failed to protect the US from multiple terrorist attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dantheman</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-578141</link>
		<dc:creator>Dantheman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-578141</guid>
		<description>&quot;IN fairness, at least it can be argued that a war is by definition an emergency action.&quot;

In fairness, that applies to the first year of a war, not the fifth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"IN fairness, at least it can be argued that a war is by definition an emergency action."</p>
<p>In fairness, that applies to the first year of a war, not the fifth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-577533</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-577533</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, this is the same administration who has, for seven years running, failed to foresee that two ongoing wars would cause an additional strain on the budget and therefore had to rely on emergency appropriations to fund them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

IN fairness, at least it can be argued that a war is by definition an emergency action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course, this is the same administration who has, for seven years running, failed to foresee that two ongoing wars would cause an additional strain on the budget and therefore had to rely on emergency appropriations to fund them.</p></blockquote>
<p>IN fairness, at least it can be argued that a war is by definition an emergency action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ap</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_inauguration_declared_emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-575791</link>
		<dc:creator>ap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/?p=29947#comment-575791</guid>
		<description>easily the most snark-able news story of my lifetime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>easily the most snark-able news story of my lifetime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
