<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Joins in on Burdensome Transparency Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:12:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-354246</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-354246</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;The bottom line, though, is that this is a bill that is going to put even more burdens on small companies, barely affect large ones at all, and will do absolutely nothing to solve the problem for which it is ostensibly being introduced to solve. Ugh.&quot;&quot;
&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;

The very purpose for which your legislator was born!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>""The bottom line, though, is that this is a bill that is going to put even more burdens on small companies, barely affect large ones at all, and will do absolutely nothing to solve the problem for which it is ostensibly being introduced to solve. Ugh.""<br />
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""</p>
<p>The very purpose for which your legislator was born!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353639</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353639</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Um... You&#039;ve never programmed automation to a federal form, have you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, if only we could fix the government forms to make this easier, but that would take an act of Congress!  Ha ha...oh wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Um... You've never programmed automation to a federal form, have you?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, if only we could fix the government forms to make this easier, but that would take an act of Congress!  Ha ha...oh wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353603</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353603</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;With a converter?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

BWahahahhahahahhaaaa..

Um... You&#039;ve never programmed automation to a federal form, have you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>With a converter?</p></blockquote>
<p>BWahahahhahahahhaaaa..</p>
<p>Um... You've never programmed automation to a federal form, have you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353480</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353480</guid>
		<description>And now if we could just get a Politician&#039;s Transparency Act through, we might be able to ressurrect the Constitution and get those likability polls for congress about 30%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now if we could just get a Politician's Transparency Act through, we might be able to ressurrect the Constitution and get those likability polls for congress about 30%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davod</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353386</link>
		<dc:creator>davod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353386</guid>
		<description>I have read that Sarbanes Oxley resulted in many corporations moving their headquarters offshore.  The law of unintended consequences.

The Pols seem to have hit the right market this time.  Where will the Mom and Pops go?

As with Sarbanes Oxley and immigration - aren&#039;t there laws on the books already.

Maybe this is just another Federal land grab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read that Sarbanes Oxley resulted in many corporations moving their headquarters offshore.  The law of unintended consequences.</p>
<p>The Pols seem to have hit the right market this time.  Where will the Mom and Pops go?</p>
<p>As with Sarbanes Oxley and immigration - aren't there laws on the books already.</p>
<p>Maybe this is just another Federal land grab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353363</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353363</guid>
		<description>Well, it appears that the reason this legislation exists is that &#039;big&#039; corporations and/or wealthy individuals are creating things that &#039;look&#039; like mom &amp; pop LLCs in order to engage in &quot;money laundering, tax evasion, or other misconduct.&quot; 

If this increase in reporting &amp; record-keeping is too onerous, what _would_ be a good way to detect this kind of fraud?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it appears that the reason this legislation exists is that 'big' corporations and/or wealthy individuals are creating things that 'look' like mom &amp; pop LLCs in order to engage in "money laundering, tax evasion, or other misconduct." </p>
<p>If this increase in reporting &amp; record-keeping is too onerous, what _would_ be a good way to detect this kind of fraud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353281</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353281</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Michael, I generally find some value in your comments but here you&#039;re showing your elitist side.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Correction: I&#039;m showing my engineering side.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Nearly none of them rely on computers for much more than some appointment setting. We&#039;re talking an interconnected group of small businesses that use paper receipts, date books, etc because it&#039;s EASIER than entering this stuff in a computer, and their margins are slim enough that the applications (which mostly suck) for their environment aren&#039;t worth the cost.&lt;/blockquote&gt;How do they calculate their business tax burdens?  Do they have to go through all their receipts from the past year, calculate their income and expenses, find the right tax rate, etc?

&lt;blockquote&gt;their margins are slim enough that the applications (which mostly suck) for their environment aren&#039;t worth the cost. They spend enough on other equipment that the digital side doesn&#039;t offer enough benefit to spend on that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Ok, now I&#039;ll show my elitism: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnucash.org/features.phtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GnuCash&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s not Peachtree, but it&#039;s better than Excel or dead trees.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Further, your comment really indicates a lack of understanding on how many people just are not that computer proficient.&lt;/blockquote&gt;On the contrary, that comment indicates that I am _painfully_ aware of how most people use Excel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Michael, I generally find some value in your comments but here you're showing your elitist side.</p></blockquote>
<p>Correction: I'm showing my engineering side.</p>
<blockquote><p>Nearly none of them rely on computers for much more than some appointment setting. We're talking an interconnected group of small businesses that use paper receipts, date books, etc because it's EASIER than entering this stuff in a computer, and their margins are slim enough that the applications (which mostly suck) for their environment aren't worth the cost.</p></blockquote>
<p>How do they calculate their business tax burdens?  Do they have to go through all their receipts from the past year, calculate their income and expenses, find the right tax rate, etc?</p>
<blockquote><p>their margins are slim enough that the applications (which mostly suck) for their environment aren't worth the cost. They spend enough on other equipment that the digital side doesn't offer enough benefit to spend on that.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok, now I'll show my elitism: <a href="http://www.gnucash.org/features.phtml" rel="nofollow">GnuCash</a>.  It's not Peachtree, but it's better than Excel or dead trees.</p>
<blockquote><p>Further, your comment really indicates a lack of understanding on how many people just are not that computer proficient.</p></blockquote>
<p>On the contrary, that comment indicates that I am _painfully_ aware of how most people use Excel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill W</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353279</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353279</guid>
		<description>Michael, I generally find some value in your comments but here you&#039;re showing your elitist side.

Many, MANY small businesses don&#039;t use or keep much information in electronic form. Anecdotes (not data! ;)): My wife is a groomer, and regularly attends small workshops and such, interacting with nearly every other groomer, dog/cat sitter, etc that serves that business niche between Tampa and Orlando (so not that small a pool). Nearly none of them rely on computers for much more than some appointment setting. We&#039;re talking an interconnected group of small businesses that use paper receipts, date books, etc because it&#039;s EASIER than entering this stuff in a computer, and their margins are slim enough that the applications (which mostly suck) for their environment aren&#039;t worth the cost. They spend enough on other equipment that the digital side doesn&#039;t offer enough benefit to spend on that.

More than just pet related stuff, you&#039;ve also got the people who sell the incidentals that these businesses use, the shampoo vendors, knife/scissor sharpener guys who travel around, independent dog/cat food people (they generally sell homemade treats). Most of these people don&#039;t have much in the way of electronic invoicing either. Add in the time over what they spent just performing the trade that generates income on what they spend keeping track of receipts, travel expenses, and everything else, adding more paperwork or regulations to create the same info in another form and you&#039;re looking at more hours spent NOT generating income. 

Further, your comment&lt;blockquote&gt;Also, people who use Excel for anything but spreadsheets should be hit with large amounts of paperwork, just on principle.&lt;/blockquote&gt; really indicates a lack of understanding on how many people just are not that computer proficient. Basic excel is easy enough and allows people to use the computer successfully. More complicated stuff confuses them enough and benefits them little enough that they don&#039;t want to spend the time to learn it. They already HAVE a job and skills...these aren&#039;t worth their time to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I generally find some value in your comments but here you're showing your elitist side.</p>
<p>Many, MANY small businesses don't use or keep much information in electronic form. Anecdotes (not data! ;)): My wife is a groomer, and regularly attends small workshops and such, interacting with nearly every other groomer, dog/cat sitter, etc that serves that business niche between Tampa and Orlando (so not that small a pool). Nearly none of them rely on computers for much more than some appointment setting. We're talking an interconnected group of small businesses that use paper receipts, date books, etc because it's EASIER than entering this stuff in a computer, and their margins are slim enough that the applications (which mostly suck) for their environment aren't worth the cost. They spend enough on other equipment that the digital side doesn't offer enough benefit to spend on that.</p>
<p>More than just pet related stuff, you've also got the people who sell the incidentals that these businesses use, the shampoo vendors, knife/scissor sharpener guys who travel around, independent dog/cat food people (they generally sell homemade treats). Most of these people don't have much in the way of electronic invoicing either. Add in the time over what they spent just performing the trade that generates income on what they spend keeping track of receipts, travel expenses, and everything else, adding more paperwork or regulations to create the same info in another form and you're looking at more hours spent NOT generating income. </p>
<p>Further, your comment<br />
<blockquote>Also, people who use Excel for anything but spreadsheets should be hit with large amounts of paperwork, just on principle.</p></blockquote>
<p> really indicates a lack of understanding on how many people just are not that computer proficient. Basic excel is easy enough and allows people to use the computer successfully. More complicated stuff confuses them enough and benefits them little enough that they don't want to spend the time to learn it. They already HAVE a job and skills...these aren't worth their time to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugh</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353271</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353271</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You&#039;re assuming that mom-and-pop LLCs &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Presumably Mom &amp; Pop LLCs wouldn&#039;t have any trouble keeping track of their owners, to wit:

1. Mom
2. Pop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You're assuming that mom-and-pop LLCs </p></blockquote>
<p>Presumably Mom &amp; Pop LLCs wouldn't have any trouble keeping track of their owners, to wit:</p>
<p>1. Mom<br />
2. Pop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353269</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353269</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Regardless, how you convert that to the required forms is an outstanding question, Mike&lt;/blockquote&gt;With a converter?  Once the information is in structured electronic data, making copies is free, and conversions are a one time expense.

In the case of Excel, a macro of VBA script could do it.  For actual accounting packages, they would include converters for you, so it&#039;s just a click of a button.

If you really wanted to avoid burden, the government would provide a web service where the software can automatically submit the signed information on a scheduled basis.  Then nobody would have to do anything but keep their accounting data up-to-date, which they should be doing anyway, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Regardless, how you convert that to the required forms is an outstanding question, Mike</p></blockquote>
<p>With a converter?  Once the information is in structured electronic data, making copies is free, and conversions are a one time expense.</p>
<p>In the case of Excel, a macro of VBA script could do it.  For actual accounting packages, they would include converters for you, so it's just a click of a button.</p>
<p>If you really wanted to avoid burden, the government would provide a web service where the software can automatically submit the signed information on a scheduled basis.  Then nobody would have to do anything but keep their accounting data up-to-date, which they should be doing anyway, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353264</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353264</guid>
		<description>Regardless, how you convert that to the required forms is an outstanding question, Mike.

The reason you&#039;re not concerned about increased paperwork, I take to be because you&#039;re not a small business owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless, how you convert that to the required forms is an outstanding question, Mike.</p>
<p>The reason you're not concerned about increased paperwork, I take to be because you're not a small business owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353256</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353256</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A lot of small business owners that I know, especially side businesses, just use Excel or equivalent.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That&#039;s still existing information in electronic form, so again you just have a one-off expense to create a conversion routine and that&#039;s it.

Also, people who use Excel for anything but spreadsheets should be hit with large amounts of paperwork, just on principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A lot of small business owners that I know, especially side businesses, just use Excel or equivalent.</p></blockquote>
<p>That's still existing information in electronic form, so again you just have a one-off expense to create a conversion routine and that's it.</p>
<p>Also, people who use Excel for anything but spreadsheets should be hit with large amounts of paperwork, just on principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353249</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353249</guid>
		<description>Norm Coleman &lt;strike&gt;(R-Neb)&lt;/strike&gt; (R-MN)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norm Coleman <strike>(R-Neb)</strike> (R-MN)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353242</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353242</guid>
		<description>A lot of small business owners that I know, especially side businesses, just use Excel or equivalent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of small business owners that I know, especially side businesses, just use Excel or equivalent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/comment-page-1/#comment-353238</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/05/obama_joins_in_on_burdensome_transparency_act/#comment-353238</guid>
		<description>How can you run any business without some kind of computer system in 2008?  Are there actually still people who determine how much to pay in taxes by referring to their two column ledger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you run any business without some kind of computer system in 2008?  Are there actually still people who determine how much to pay in taxes by referring to their two column ledger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
