Right. Forget about that pile of shit we've been sitting in for the past 7 years. No, it's the pile of shit that G.A. *thinks* might happen that's much worse.

like what? liberals traitors undermining the war effort and getting our troops killed, or liberals ruining the housing market with their fanny pack and mack some loot bank, or the way they took over two years ago and the greatest economy in the history of the world collapsed lol gas went up 2 dolor a gallon just by their mer presence, or the way they bought and stoled a presidential election right at the and the same pooping time. Dude Why? your saying it's going to get better now that the agnostic fools are in full control LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!

Oh and your dear leader's post election grace period is over and he has had 1/2 day to fix everything, but he partied all night instead, so I officialy have taken off my anti typing gloves and it's on.

time to once again call out the American's in name only crowd.

lol who cares, what does it even matter anymore, game over man, were in some real pretty shit now............

Right. Forget about that pile of shit we've been sitting in for the past 7 years. No, it's the pile of shit that G.A. *thinks* might happen that's much worse.

Boy, nothing like conservative collective amnesia.

If 100 million Americans were watching me live, and an historic president was staring at me from a distance of 3 feet, I'd probably be sweating and shaking so hard they'd hospitalize me :-)

Thanks for your comment, Senator Kennedy.

FWIW I don't think Roberts should beat himself up about flubbing the line twice. Stress makes us botch things sometimes. No harm.

Completely agree. It was a light moment of humanity intervening in a solemn occasion. Noteworthy, I thought, but not otherwise a big deal.

Which means he isn't President, right?

I am not a lawyer but I've had several friends who were, and we've talked about these kinds of situations before. They tell me that in the event of a pointless technicality, like the word 'faithfully' being in the wrong place here, judges almost never take the stupidly literalist position and invalidate the action. They typically rule according to what all parties generally understood had happened.

The last conversation I had about this was with a lawyer named Jeff. I'd just heard that some state's entrance into the union had some niggling technical error. I asked him what the outcome of that could be. Would a judge rule that the state (sorry I forget which)was no longer part of the US? Jeff explained that if they thought they joined the union 100 years ago or whenever, and for 100 years everyone's behaved as if they were in the union, then no judge would radically change that just because of some silly paperwork error.

"I ___________ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

lol who cares, what does it even matter anymore, game over man, were in some real pretty shit now............