<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama &#8216;White House&#8217; Buttons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Texas GOP Show Their True &#8220;Color&#8221; at State Convention - By ¡Para Justicia y Libertad!</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-423578</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Texas GOP Show Their True &#8220;Color&#8221; at State Convention - By ¡Para Justicia y Libertad!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-423578</guid>
		<description>[...] the Texas GOP convention in Houston, Texas. The button that touched off a firestorm throughout the blogosphere and the country had said, &#8220;If Obama is elected President . . . will we still call it The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Texas GOP convention in Houston, Texas. The button that touched off a firestorm throughout the blogosphere and the country had said, &#8220;If Obama is elected President . . . will we still call it The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brainy435</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417714</link>
		<dc:creator>brainy435</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417714</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you hate people of a given race because of - say - a history of slavery, or a history of lynchings against your race, etc, that&#039;s not racism. It&#039;s not something that is OK, either, but it is simply not racism.&quot;

What a load of crap.&quot;If you hate people of a given race&quot; then you are in fact racist. ANY discrimination based on the color of skin instead of an individuals merit is racist, and that includes affirmative action.

This is more of the insane &quot;words mean whatever suits my argument&quot; liberal whitewash. At least I think it is: it depends on what &quot;is&quot; means....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"If you hate people of a given race because of - say - a history of slavery, or a history of lynchings against your race, etc, that's not racism. It's not something that is OK, either, but it is simply not racism."</p>
<p>What a load of crap."If you hate people of a given race" then you are in fact racist. ANY discrimination based on the color of skin instead of an individuals merit is racist, and that includes affirmative action.</p>
<p>This is more of the insane "words mean whatever suits my argument" liberal whitewash. At least I think it is: it depends on what "is" means....</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodney dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417705</link>
		<dc:creator>rodney dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417705</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rodney, Hal said racism is the idea that another race is inferior. You cited definitions which say that racism is the belief that your own race is superior. In other words, the definitions you cited are consistent with what he said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not exactly, The definitions I included are a superset ot Hal&#039;s definition and include 

&lt;i&gt;3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
 2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
and
Racism, by its simplest definition, is discrimination based on race.&lt;/i&gt;

Some of which Hal stated wouldn&#039;t necessarily be racism. Hal&#039;s context seems to be racism is only white biased black based the belief that blacks are inferior.  Hal&#039;s quote below:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
If you hate people of a given race because of - say - a history of slavery, or a history of lynchings against your race, etc, that&#039;s not racism. It&#039;s not something that is OK, either, but it is simply not racism.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rodney, Hal said racism is the idea that another race is inferior. You cited definitions which say that racism is the belief that your own race is superior. In other words, the definitions you cited are consistent with what he said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not exactly, The definitions I included are a superset ot Hal's definition and include </p>
<p><i>3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.<br />
 2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.<br />
and<br />
Racism, by its simplest definition, is discrimination based on race.</i></p>
<p>Some of which Hal stated wouldn't necessarily be racism. Hal's context seems to be racism is only white biased black based the belief that blacks are inferior.  Hal's quote below:</p>
<blockquote><p>
If you hate people of a given race because of - say - a history of slavery, or a history of lynchings against your race, etc, that's not racism. It's not something that is OK, either, but it is simply not racism.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jukeboxgrad</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417602</link>
		<dc:creator>jukeboxgrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417602</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m pleased to report that the Texas GOP has rejected and cut-off the vendor that sold the racist buttons.&quot;

In the article you cited, a GOP spokesman said this: “After what we consider to be a pumped-up, unifying convention, it’s one of those things you hate to see.”

Exactly two years ago, there was an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/religion/stories/DN-gopreligion_04tex.ART.State.Edition1.903cb29.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; in the same paper, about, ironically, &quot;GOP buttons.&quot; That article pointed out that the official platform of the Texas GOP says this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;America is a Christian nation&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So it&#039;s nice to know what these folks mean by &quot;unifying.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I'm pleased to report that the Texas GOP has rejected and cut-off the vendor that sold the racist buttons."</p>
<p>In the article you cited, a GOP spokesman said this: “After what we consider to be a pumped-up, unifying convention, it&rsquo;s one of those things you hate to see.”</p>
<p>Exactly two years ago, there was an <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/religion/stories/DN-gopreligion_04tex.ART.State.Edition1.903cb29.html" rel="nofollow">article</a> in the same paper, about, ironically, "GOP buttons." That article pointed out that the official platform of the Texas GOP says this:</p>
<blockquote><p>America is a Christian nation</p></blockquote>
<p>So it's nice to know what these folks mean by "unifying."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417568</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417568</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Now we can get back to debating policy differences!&lt;/em&gt;

Excellent for them.  Yes, let&#039;s get back to &quot;cap n&#039; trade&quot; issues, along with how silly it is to use Rudy as your attack dog on Terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Now we can get back to debating policy differences!</em></p>
<p>Excellent for them.  Yes, let's get back to "cap n' trade" issues, along with how silly it is to use Rudy as your attack dog on Terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoodlumman</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417567</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoodlumman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417567</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pleased to report that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/061708dnpolobamapin.11d96bfd.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Texas GOP has rejected and cut-off the vendor&lt;/a&gt; that sold the racist buttons.

Now we can get back to debating policy differences!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm pleased to report that the <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/061708dnpolobamapin.11d96bfd.html" rel="nofollow">Texas GOP has rejected and cut-off the vendor</a> that sold the racist buttons.</p>
<p>Now we can get back to debating policy differences!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jukeboxgrad</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417563</link>
		<dc:creator>jukeboxgrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417563</guid>
		<description>&quot;one of the seemingly omnipresent characteristics of racists is that they simply don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with it and are quite proud of it&quot;

Yes. And there&#039;s a word for that: shamelessness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"one of the seemingly omnipresent characteristics of racists is that they simply don't think there's anything wrong with it and are quite proud of it"</p>
<p>Yes. And there's a word for that: shamelessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jukeboxgrad</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417561</link>
		<dc:creator>jukeboxgrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417561</guid>
		<description>Rodney, Hal said racism is the idea that another race is inferior. You cited definitions which say that racism is the belief that your own race is superior. In other words, the definitions you cited are consistent with what he said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodney, Hal said racism is the idea that another race is inferior. You cited definitions which say that racism is the belief that your own race is superior. In other words, the definitions you cited are consistent with what he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417531</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417531</guid>
		<description>Or you could visit the southern poverty law center.

It&#039;s bizarre to try to create an *intentional* definition of racism, which is largely irrelevant in any reasonable discussion (e.g. &quot;man is a featherless biped&quot;).  It&#039;s true that, largely due to those who want to create a moral equivalence between racial superior-ists and those who have suffered under their tender care, that &quot;racism&quot; has degenerated in common usage to merely mean discrimination (i.e. mere recognition) of race.

I really like the standard lines from the right that Feminism is actually discrimination against males, affirmative action is really discrimination against the poor oppressed white man, and racism is simply more of the same.

Black is white, war is peace and &quot;waterboarding&quot; isn&#039;t torture.

Y&#039;all have a real track record in this whole degeneration of definitions to the point where they are completely irrelevant or completely unusable.  One might begin to suspect it&#039;s an actual strategy or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could visit the southern poverty law center.</p>
<p>It's bizarre to try to create an *intentional* definition of racism, which is largely irrelevant in any reasonable discussion (e.g. "man is a featherless biped").  It's true that, largely due to those who want to create a moral equivalence between racial superior-ists and those who have suffered under their tender care, that "racism" has degenerated in common usage to merely mean discrimination (i.e. mere recognition) of race.</p>
<p>I really like the standard lines from the right that Feminism is actually discrimination against males, affirmative action is really discrimination against the poor oppressed white man, and racism is simply more of the same.</p>
<p>Black is white, war is peace and "waterboarding" isn't torture.</p>
<p>Y'all have a real track record in this whole degeneration of definitions to the point where they are completely irrelevant or completely unusable.  One might begin to suspect it's an actual strategy or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417530</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417530</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean to imply that you did Rodney, I&#039;m sorry if it came across that way.  

It&#039;s best of the parties simply announce that they don&#039;t want those votes at all.  Maybe we could get the electorate to educate themselves a bit.

Instead, we get implicit(at best) endorsement from both parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn't mean to imply that you did Rodney, I'm sorry if it came across that way.  </p>
<p>It's best of the parties simply announce that they don't want those votes at all.  Maybe we could get the electorate to educate themselves a bit.</p>
<p>Instead, we get implicit(at best) endorsement from both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodney dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417520</link>
		<dc:creator>rodney dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417520</guid>
		<description>(Continued from where a less than sign cut off my last comment)

racisme. See race2, -ism]

—Related forms
racist, noun, adjective
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
racist

To learn more about racist visit Britannica.com

© 2008 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This
rac·ism    Audio Help   (rā&#039;sĭz&#039;əm)  Pronunciation Key 
n.  

   1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
   2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

...and Wikipedia&#039;s entry into the fray.
Racism, by its simplest definition, is discrimination based on race. People with racist beliefs might hate certain groups of people according to their race, or in the case of institutional racism, certain racial groups may be denied rights or benefits. Racism typically starts with the assumption that there are taxonomic differences between different groups of people. According to the United Nations conventions, there is no distinction between the term racial discrimination and ethnic discrimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Continued from where a less than sign cut off my last comment)</p>
<p>racisme. See race2, -ism]</p>
<p>—Related forms<br />
racist, noun, adjective<br />
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)<br />
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.<br />
Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.<br />
racist</p>
<p>To learn more about racist visit Britannica.com</p>
<p>© 2008 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.<br />
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This<br />
rac·ism    Audio Help   (rā'sĭz'əm)  Pronunciation Key<br />
n.  </p>
<p>   1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.<br />
   2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.</p>
<p>...and Wikipedia's entry into the fray.<br />
Racism, by its simplest definition, is discrimination based on race. People with racist beliefs might hate certain groups of people according to their race, or in the case of institutional racism, certain racial groups may be denied rights or benefits. Racism typically starts with the assumption that there are taxonomic differences between different groups of people. According to the United Nations conventions, there is no distinction between the term racial discrimination and ethnic discrimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodney dill</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417519</link>
		<dc:creator>rodney dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417519</guid>
		<description>Um... I didn&#039;t accuse all blacks of voting based on race, just ones that are themselves racist ... There&#039;s a big difference there. 

As for the definition of Racism, Hal. Your narrow definition wins the bizarro world claim.

----

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
rac·ism    Audio Help   /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[rey-siz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1.	a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one&#039;s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.	a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.	hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
[Origin: 1865–70; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um... I didn't accuse all blacks of voting based on race, just ones that are themselves racist ... There's a big difference there. </p>
<p>As for the definition of Racism, Hal. Your narrow definition wins the bizarro world claim.</p>
<p>----</p>
<p>Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This<br />
rac·ism    Audio Help   /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[rey-siz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation<br />
–noun<br />
1.	a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.<br />
2.	a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.<br />
3.	hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.<br />
[Origin: 1865–70;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417478</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417478</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Though Mr. Sharpton was quick to boast that he had bested Howard Dean, Gen. Wesley K. Clark and Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, his anemic showing leaves him hard pressed to present himself as the candidate best able to speak for minority voters within the Democratic Party. It also undermines his strategy of using delegates to leverage influence at the Democratic National Convention this summer.

&#039;&#039;He is not catching fire with the black vote,&#039;&#039; said David Bositis, an analyst with the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies in Washington. &#039;&#039;The black vote is looking for a winner and they are not looking to make a statement about race. John Kerry is one of the whitest guys, you know what I mean. The fact that he is getting almost twice as much as Sharpton is getting, that sends a message.&#039;&#039; &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Though Mr. Sharpton was quick to boast that he had bested Howard Dean, Gen. Wesley K. Clark and Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, his anemic showing leaves him hard pressed to present himself as the candidate best able to speak for minority voters within the Democratic Party. It also undermines his strategy of using delegates to leverage influence at the Democratic National Convention this summer.</p>
<p>''He is not catching fire with the black vote,'' said David Bositis, an analyst with the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies in Washington. ''The black vote is looking for a winner and they are not looking to make a statement about race. John Kerry is one of the whitest guys, you know what I mean. The fact that he is getting almost twice as much as Sharpton is getting, that sends a message.'' </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417475</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417475</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;They are apparently better at recognizing and admitting their faults, however.&lt;/em&gt;

You say that like it&#039;s a virtue.  While admittedly a biased sample, all the racists I know (and I have them in my family in North Carolina in spades) are quite open about their racism and have no issues with it - they simply don&#039;t see it as a problem.  Indeed, one of the seemingly omnipresent characteristics of racists is that they simply don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with it and are quite proud of it.

So, your attempt at spinning this as a virtue is pretty darn weird.

&lt;em&gt;Presumably blacks that are racist against whites would be voting more Democrat.&lt;/em&gt;

You are, of course, promulgating the bizarro world definition of &quot;racist&quot; which is quite typical of the right.  Just for the record, racism&#039;s defining characteristic is the belief that people of a given race are &lt;em&gt;inferior&lt;/em&gt;.  If you hate people of a given race because of - say - a history of slavery, or a history of lynchings against your race, etc, that&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; racism.  It&#039;s not something that is OK, either, but it is simply &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; racism.

To define it as such is to &lt;em&gt;purposefully&lt;/em&gt; obscure the issue such that the ability to talk about the issue becomes impossible. 

Which is the intent, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>They are apparently better at recognizing and admitting their faults, however.</em></p>
<p>You say that like it's a virtue.  While admittedly a biased sample, all the racists I know (and I have them in my family in North Carolina in spades) are quite open about their racism and have no issues with it - they simply don't see it as a problem.  Indeed, one of the seemingly omnipresent characteristics of racists is that they simply don't think there's anything wrong with it and are quite proud of it.</p>
<p>So, your attempt at spinning this as a virtue is pretty darn weird.</p>
<p><em>Presumably blacks that are racist against whites would be voting more Democrat.</em></p>
<p>You are, of course, promulgating the bizarro world definition of "racist" which is quite typical of the right.  Just for the record, racism's defining characteristic is the belief that people of a given race are <em>inferior</em>.  If you hate people of a given race because of - say - a history of slavery, or a history of lynchings against your race, etc, that's <strong>not</strong> racism.  It's not something that is OK, either, but it is simply <strong>not</strong> racism.</p>
<p>To define it as such is to <em>purposefully</em> obscure the issue such that the ability to talk about the issue becomes impossible. </p>
<p>Which is the intent, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/obama_white_house_buttons/comment-page-1/#comment-417474</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/obama_white_house_buttons/#comment-417474</guid>
		<description>- The parties need to stand up and denounce this sort of thing.  The Republicans need to explicitly state that votes based on skin color are not welcome.  The Democrats need to do the same thing, after what we witnessed (and still see from some of her supporters).   A lot of Democrats (including me) got a surprise about the party makeup when some of Hillary&#039;s supporters were thrust into the spotlight.

And to accuse blacks of voting because of race?  Suuure.  Look at how many black voted for Sharpton?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- The parties need to stand up and denounce this sort of thing.  The Republicans need to explicitly state that votes based on skin color are not welcome.  The Democrats need to do the same thing, after what we witnessed (and still see from some of her supporters).   A lot of Democrats (including me) got a surprise about the party makeup when some of Hillary's supporters were thrust into the spotlight.</p>
<p>And to accuse blacks of voting because of race?  Suuure.  Look at how many black voted for Sharpton?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
