<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bureaucrats As Pundits, Part IV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/on_bureaucrats_as_pundits_part_iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/on_bureaucrats_as_pundits_part_iii/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:40:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/on_bureaucrats_as_pundits_part_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-75034</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13740#comment-75034</guid>
		<description>Corrections noted. I left State in 2003 and apparently missed the renaming.

And I certainly did neglect to mention the FSS. These include important groups of people without whom embassies would fall apart. In addition to those you mention, there are also all the Communications people, though their work is becoming ever more intertwined with IT.

Also not mention are the Foreign Service National staffs (FSNs) and locally-hired Americans.

I recall trying to explain to the newly appointed USIA Director, Bruce Gelb, what FSNs did and how we worked with them. He couldn&#039;t get his mind around the facts that a) they were trusted employees and b) we&#039;d be waay up the creek if we didn&#039;t have them. Not sure he ever got it.

Not sure, in fact, that the bean-counters at State realize it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrections noted. I left State in 2003 and apparently missed the renaming.</p>
<p>And I certainly did neglect to mention the FSS. These include important groups of people without whom embassies would fall apart. In addition to those you mention, there are also all the Communications people, though their work is becoming ever more intertwined with IT.</p>
<p>Also not mention are the Foreign Service National staffs (FSNs) and locally-hired Americans.</p>
<p>I recall trying to explain to the newly appointed USIA Director, Bruce Gelb, what FSNs did and how we worked with them. He couldn't get his mind around the facts that a) they were trusted employees and b) we'd be waay up the creek if we didn't have them. Not sure he ever got it.</p>
<p>Not sure, in fact, that the bean-counters at State realize it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consul-At-Arms</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/on_bureaucrats_as_pundits_part_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-75020</link>
		<dc:creator>Consul-At-Arms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13740#comment-75020</guid>
		<description>Two quibbles:

The Admin cone was re-named Management cone sometime in the past couple of years.

There&#039;re also several smaller corps of Foreign Service Specialist (FSS) within the Department, who serve overseas in such career fields as diplomatic security agents, office managers, information management, nurses, physicians &amp;tc.  Their selection process is something in between that of FSO generalists and General Schedule employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two quibbles:</p>
<p>The Admin cone was re-named Management cone sometime in the past couple of years.</p>
<p>There're also several smaller corps of Foreign Service Specialist (FSS) within the Department, who serve overseas in such career fields as diplomatic security agents, office managers, information management, nurses, physicians &amp;tc.  Their selection process is something in between that of FSO generalists and General Schedule employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/on_bureaucrats_as_pundits_part_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-74224</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13740#comment-74224</guid>
		<description>Heh.  Well, it&#039;s either part II of &quot;On Bureaucrats as Pundits&quot; or part IV of the larger series.  I&#039;ve made a command decision that it&#039;s the latter and put in the related links section.

In any case, an excellent addition to the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.  Well, it's either part II of "On Bureaucrats as Pundits" or part IV of the larger series.  I've made a command decision that it's the latter and put in the related links section.</p>
<p>In any case, an excellent addition to the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/on_bureaucrats_as_pundits_part_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-74213</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13740#comment-74213</guid>
		<description>That may be, but as James is the one who started this, I&#039;ll let him relabel it. I&#039;m furthering the discussion on his previous post, but perhaps it deserve promotion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That may be, but as James is the one who started this, I'll let him relabel it. I'm furthering the discussion on his previous post, but perhaps it deserve promotion...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/on_bureaucrats_as_pundits_part_iii/comment-page-1/#comment-74209</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/13740#comment-74209</guid>
		<description>This is actually part IV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually part IV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
