<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Freedom of Speech Act and Drawing Lines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:20:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charles austin</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/comment-page-1/#comment-76737</link>
		<dc:creator>charles austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 05:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/#comment-76737</guid>
		<description>And here I thought that the Daily Kos shouldn&#039;t be taken seriously because he and his friends are little more than foul-mouthed, hyper-partisan hacks with no respect for their opponents, election results, or the democratic process unless, of course, they win.  Then again, they are still 0-for-whatever last time I checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I thought that the Daily Kos shouldn't be taken seriously because he and his friends are little more than foul-mouthed, hyper-partisan hacks with no respect for their opponents, election results, or the democratic process unless, of course, they win.  Then again, they are still 0-for-whatever last time I checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/comment-page-1/#comment-76733</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 03:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/#comment-76733</guid>
		<description>james; rights existed before jefferson, just as gravity existed before newton. jefferson knew he was stating the obvious. men must be confident that rights come from a source higher than men or they won&#039;t have the courage to stand against superior force to protect them.otherwise they are not rights, but only priviledges to be doled out at the whim of stronger men or governments.we fight and die to resist the violation of God given rights,or to restore them, not to establish them . rights are eternal, priviledge fleeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>james; rights existed before jefferson, just as gravity existed before newton. jefferson knew he was stating the obvious. men must be confident that rights come from a source higher than men or they won't have the courage to stand against superior force to protect them.otherwise they are not rights, but only priviledges to be doled out at the whim of stronger men or governments.we fight and die to resist the violation of God given rights,or to restore them, not to establish them . rights are eternal, priviledge fleeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joyner</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/comment-page-1/#comment-76731</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/#comment-76731</guid>
		<description>Floyd: While Jefferson asserted these Creator-endowed rights in 1776, they were largely theoretical until men fought and died for them. They didn&#039;t exist because of supernatural edict.

Madison is credited with writing the 1st Amendment, which is the legal basis for that right in the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floyd: While Jefferson asserted these Creator-endowed rights in 1776, they were largely theoretical until men fought and died for them. They didn't exist because of supernatural edict.</p>
<p>Madison is credited with writing the 1st Amendment, which is the legal basis for that right in the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/comment-page-1/#comment-76729</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/#comment-76729</guid>
		<description>BTW; even atheists have God given rights.it doesn&#039;t matter whether you think they are from principal or principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW; even atheists have God given rights.it doesn't matter whether you think they are from principal or principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/comment-page-1/#comment-76728</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 23:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/#comment-76728</guid>
		<description>james madison is dead. rights cannot be given by men or government; only violated or respected. don&#039;t confuse rights and priviledges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>james madison is dead. rights cannot be given by men or government; only violated or respected. don't confuse rights and priviledges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/comment-page-1/#comment-76724</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 22:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/#comment-76724</guid>
		<description>Had DailyKos been an opponent of the BCFRA and other &#039;campaign finance&#039; laws, I might agree with his complaints that his rights are being infringed.

However, he&#039;s been a big supporter of such laws.  He apparently only upset when the laws he wants to impose on others are applied to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had DailyKos been an opponent of the BCFRA and other 'campaign finance' laws, I might agree with his complaints that his rights are being infringed.</p>
<p>However, he's been a big supporter of such laws.  He apparently only upset when the laws he wants to impose on others are applied to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/comment-page-1/#comment-76715</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2006/03/online_freedom_of_speech_act_and_drawing_lines/#comment-76715</guid>
		<description>james; you have great clarity. that&#039;s rare in a man with so much education. keep your voice of sanity, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>james; you have great clarity. that's rare in a man with so much education. keep your voice of sanity, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
