working

ADVERTISERS

POPULAR TAGS

ADVERTISERS

 Outside the Beltway 

Osama’s Nukes

Over at Command Post , Michele passes along this AP story:

Osama bin Laden’s terror network claims to have bought ready-made nuclear weapons on the black market in central Asia, the biographer of al-Qaida’s No. 2 leader was quoted as telling an Australian television station.

In an interview scheduled to be televised on Monday, Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir said Ayman al-Zawahri claimed that “smart briefcase bombs” were available on the black market. It was not clear when the interview between Mir and al-Zawahri took place.

U.S. intelligence agencies have long believed that al-Qaida attempted to acquire a nuclear device on the black market, but say there is no evidence it was successful.

In the interview with Australian Broadcasting Corp. television, parts of which were released Sunday, Mir recalled telling al-Zawahri it was difficult to believe that al-Qaida had nuclear weapons when the terror network didn’t have the equipment to maintain or use them.

“Dr Ayman al-Zawahri laughed and he said ‘Mr. Mir, if you have $30 million, go to the black market in central Asia, contact any disgruntled Soviet scientist, and a lot of … smart briefcase bombs are available,’” Mir said in the interview.

This is interesting although, as the piece points out several paragraphs down, such claims are not new.

About the Author: James Joyner is the publisher of Outside the Beltway and the managing editor of the Atlantic Council. He's a former Army officer, Desert Storm vet, and college professor with a PhD in political science from The University of Alabama. He lives just outside the Beltway in Alexandria, Virginia.

Follow James on FriendFeed | Twitter | Digg
 
 
Related Stories:
    • None Found
 
Recent Stories:
Tags | Terrorism
| Subscribe to RSS Feed | Permalink | Send TrackBack

 
Comments
 

Generally, if terrorist feel compelled to make such statements its to instill fear, not fact.

If they, in fact, had nucs, they would make their statments in other ways.

That's not to say such statements should be taken lightly...because they do reflect intent to acquire and intent to use ... thus we must endure in the war against terrorism and Never Forget.

Posted by Delta Dave | March 21, 2004 | 09:58 pm | Permalink
 

Briefcase bomb? OK, very heavy briefcase. Rather heavy suitcase, that you can't lift. (or was that an elephant?) Regardless, after over 10 years of no maintenance, you might get a pop, and not much boom. Think of it as an AMC Gremlin that hasn't moved in 15 years. Will it start, or won't it? And if it does, can it get up to 60 MPH?

Posted by R Gardner | March 21, 2004 | 11:27 pm | Permalink
 

They would have used it by now.

Posted by Little Miss Attila | March 22, 2004 | 01:46 am | Permalink
 

r. gardner is right. they are just attempting to frighten us. if you could truly carry one in a suitcase it certainly wouldn't do much damage. the yield would have to be very small.

Posted by Captain Scarlet | March 22, 2004 | 08:27 am | Permalink
 

I always thought the suitcase nukes were a myth but a retired SF buddy of mine said they had 'em. They were incredibly low yield, though. I guess the main threat from a terrorist standpoint would be to make a "dirty bomb" out of it.

Posted by James Joyner | March 22, 2004 | 08:35 am | Permalink
 

Even so, you have to wonder but that they might get some nukes eventually. Scary.

---

Posted by a random passerby | March 22, 2004 | 10:01 am | Permalink
 

RSS feed for these comments.

Comments are Closed

 
Search OTB
Lijit Logo
OTB RSS Subscribers via FeedBurner
For Advertising Info, write
otb@blogads.com

ADVERTISERS

OTB MEDIA

OTB Gone Hollywood

OTB Sports

Allie is Wired

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

New Atlanticist Atlantic Council Blog
Atlantic Update Atlantic Council Blog



Visitors Since Feb. 4, 2003

All original content copyright 2003-2008 by OTB Media. All rights reserved.