<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OTB Radio &#8211; Tonight at 7 Eastern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_radio_-_tonight_at_7_eastern-34/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_radio_-_tonight_at_7_eastern-34/</link>
	<description>Online Journal of Politics and Foreign Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:10:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bithead</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_radio_-_tonight_at_7_eastern-34/comment-page-1/#comment-397030</link>
		<dc:creator>Bithead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/otb_radio_-_tonight_at_7_eastern-34/#comment-397030</guid>
		<description>I had actually intended to suggest that Bush was a lightweight ideologically.  from a mechanistic, process oriented view, certainly, Bush ahd the stuff. But not from a School of Reagan viewpoint. Let&#039;s recall, Bush was brought to the Reagan ticket for balance. 

In a lot of ways (Particularly in hiw own view, if you read his book) Quayle was more a Reaganite than Bush was.

The place Bush stood a chance of being out-shone, was in ideology, and that was a glaring lack, that both he and W share, alas. Which is how you ended up with brilliance like a no new taxes pledge being reversed.  Like McCain, he&#039;s far too interested in &#039;getting along&#039; with the Democrats... people who promptly used that taxes consession as a club to beat him up with, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had actually intended to suggest that Bush was a lightweight ideologically.  from a mechanistic, process oriented view, certainly, Bush ahd the stuff. But not from a School of Reagan viewpoint. Let's recall, Bush was brought to the Reagan ticket for balance. </p>
<p>In a lot of ways (Particularly in hiw own view, if you read his book) Quayle was more a Reaganite than Bush was.</p>
<p>The place Bush stood a chance of being out-shone, was in ideology, and that was a glaring lack, that both he and W share, alas. Which is how you ended up with brilliance like a no new taxes pledge being reversed.  Like McCain, he's far too interested in 'getting along' with the Democrats... people who promptly used that taxes consession as a club to beat him up with, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/otb_radio_-_tonight_at_7_eastern-34/comment-page-1/#comment-396197</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Brazell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2008/06/otb_radio_-_tonight_at_7_eastern-34/#comment-396197</guid>
		<description>Listened for 10 mins or so. Schuler sounded way too intellectually off-putting. That and you turned off the chatroom. Sorry. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listened for 10 mins or so. Schuler sounded way too intellectually off-putting. That and you turned off the chatroom. Sorry. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
